winners inside

Ok here you go mr intensity today rutgers ml-127. i didn't think anyone was so obsessed about me having to keep track of the vig on every play cheech makes. and i'm still up big following cheech's plays . what's your agenda here  anyway ?

@chicubs09

 If you got that line you are lucky, it was higher at two books I follow. You wont be able to buy 2.5 pts in hoops for -127 vig. The reality is if he chooses not to list true costs of his wagers and since he buys points often, dont be shocked when people come and call it out. It is misleading and causes drama as we see in this thread and others where he loses and does not clarify the true cost.

DK lists a 2.5 to ML line anywhere from a 145 to a 155 vig depending on the vig on the original line.

@wallstreetcappers

 At betonline it was -127 right before tipoff the regular line was rutgers-2 . i barely got the play in on time as you can see cheech posted very close to starting time.

100 percent true.

Books arent letting bettors buy 2-3 points and only charging -1.20 vig.  To this day, i dont know why people just cant post a record.

Let the thread die and let Cheech get back to his winning ways. Everyone’s argument is sad to watch. Sorry you lost your silly amount you couldn’t afford to lose. Don’t take the bet or the juice if you can’t handle the loss.. smh

this entire conversation is way above your head

starting with it was a MONEY LINE play

has NOTHING to do with your spread play

my head hurts just reading your posts

find another hobby

btw….the earth is not flat

Keep posting plays Cheech, I am up a good amount thanks to you and Totter, don't get discouraged by some negativity 

Just want everyone know one thing….

i like turtles 

carry on Cheech! 

Keep em coming cheech, you’ve been on a tear. Always appreciate your picks! 

Just wondering why you are only in this thread pushing your new Covers rules that don't exist.  No where are these rules where you need to post juice or a record.   

Cheech stopped  posting his record so how is it misleading anyone now?

@RoughEmUp

The reason I get involved is the drama he creates with all this. It turns into a fight regularly because of the lack of clarity on his bets. Nobody is being boxed or banned but several threads there are members fighting with each other and pile on when someone asks for clarity and details. Read my messages here and in the other thread, I stated that it is not shocking that people question his information when he is NOT CLEAR on his wagers, we are not going to allow other members to bash each other because someone asked for clarity. I will box members who bash others asking simple questions and the whole thing would be gone if the poster was clear on what he was doing and then there would be no drama.

I like no drama...

@wallstreetcappers

 He Makes picks, they win or lose. That is clarity. If you or anyone else doesn’t like the way he does it don’t open his threads. Truly not difficult. He doesn’t post record anymore so now no one can complain. He posts a side, take it or leave it, Jesus Christ you and others are the reason this website is dying. 

@wallstreetcappers

 Cheech made one post.  no drama.  I would say there are 2 posters here trying to cause drama and you are justifying it.

You should be asking them to avoid the thread if they don't like the way he posts,  that would help avoid drama

@Mik999999

Again...read what I post and stop making drama yourself. We do not allow other members to bash and fight in the main forums, THAT is why we get involved. If he wants to post outrageous ML wagers that is his choice, but if someone asks for clarity when he is NOT providing it, that member should not be attacked or hounded as the reason for the question is due to the lack of clarity from the poster.

So yes he can post plays, not keep a record, not post the true lines he gets that is pretty dumb but we allow it to an extent, but you followers need to back off attacking someone who asks for clarity, there is NOTHING wrong with asking cheech to post what vig he paid on a wager or what his unit total is, that is not breaking the rules and it is not unreasonable at all. The whole thing is drama cheech creates by not disclosing the full details of his wagers.

Simple stuff here...

@wallstreetcappers

Can you please get rotation numbers back up

@RoughEmUp

 This is untrue, he posted a ML wager without clarity, THAT is the drama. What follows after is members fighting about him needing to be clear or not. You do not think he needs to be clear, others do. I do actually as it would eliminate the drama. If he posted Rutgers ML -140 then drama gone. The drama comes from the origin of the thread, not someone asking how much it cost him to play the game. 

What is a fact is you or anyone else is not allowed to attack someone asking for clarity, he does not provide it and that detail IS important to people making decisions, nothing wrong asking about what his wager cost. Someone asking for clarity is not attacking your pal and we will not allow attacks..

The lines @wallstreetcappers

Can you help with those

63     +1.5 o128.5 +112 46     -1.5 u128.5 -134

Here is the closing line at scoresandodds.com Rutgers regular spread was -1.5-120 yet the ml was -134 there . i got the ml-127 at betonline a minute before tip off  so how is that so far fetched? had cheech won this nobody would have said anything but since he lost it got out of hand. and i'm not going to keep track of the vig anymore on cheech's plays.

How is a Rutgers ML as his pick creating drama? What is Cheech supposed to give you a rundown of the cheapest money lines across 10 books? Seriously the only people creating drama are the people who come into someone's thread and ask irrelevant questions. He is not for charging picks, making promises or slamming anyone else. If you don't want to know what HE is betting don't open the thread. He has no obligation to you or anyone else on the forum to justify whether buying points is a good long term strategy, what he paid for the Rutgers moneyline or what is or isn't up for the year. Do your own research and quit whining. The transparency police posts get so old.

you got fools posting without clarity everyday

look at asian gamblez 10 games of the century. decade. millineum every day

that's not a problem but to Covers?

@Bettorific

 lol  

Playing okc -5 in the nba good luck everyone let’s get it 

You guys are a bunch of babies. Did you think you were gonna get Rutgers + moneyline pregame? LOL.

accept your loss and move on to the next one. 

@cheech1972

 Nice rebound from the earlier loss

@cheech1972

 nice call!