All Forums | College Football

2018 Bowl Under system... 37 - 3 in 2017... Lets Do it Again!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 118937
Posts: 917
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2017
Posts: 329
Posted: #226
Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 735
Posted: #227
Quote Originally Posted by HarryKnutsak:

Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page?

same man. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #228

Quote Originally Posted by HomeDresser:

QUOTE Originally Posted by HarryKnutsak: Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page? same man.

Hey guys no clue whats going on with the thread... it like cut off? 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #229
One thing I just noticed is it looks like sometime this weekend covers changed its formats of the forums... It might have cut off a bunch of posts... Anyways slow start we in this for long haul...

3 - 2 this year to start system... -3.3 units... long way to go
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 687
Posted: #230
This system that you use is practical and will work more often than not I did follow this last few games and yes lost a few. I never bet or follow blindly and if I lose money I dont talk crap about the people I follow its on me. I have always kinda of done a system similarly to this except in the first half if under more than half the total I sometimes bet the second over with pretty good results usually a feeling about the game. Never thought of the way you are doing it but always willing to try new betting methods if it makes me money. Thanks for taking the time to post and please dont let the babies and whiners on here get to you. I dont post very often because I usually just read a few posters on here that are really good and dont want to fill their post with crap. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1010
Posted: #231
I got under 34- tue nite/36- wed nite  I like it so much I may parlay them
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 692
Posted: #232
With the early lines I got at 5D I went 4-1 WON a 1st half U by .5 I'll check which game tomorrow. Bedtime.wait,wait.wait.
my notes show 5-1
Did I add a game by mistake?
nc at u/26
troy   u/31.5 loss/
wky   u27
org    u/30.5
csu    u/29.5
mts    u/32
I will check my 5D account later to see where I got the hook or pt.
You guys will have already found it by then. not sure what the hell I did , but came up with 6 BOWL games. Do NOT care. 5-1 going into tonight and LOVE this system!
Hope the turnovers settle down a bit.

-Trapper
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 692
Posted: #233
Right now at 5D

34.5 Tue..........................36.5 Wed


-Trapper
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 1953
Posted: #234

Quote Originally Posted by HarryKnutsak:

Is it just me that cant see from post #220 to the end of the last page?

I think mine was the last post, and I can't see anything either. Amazingly I just found my post in drafts (I was having all sorts of problems with the website), so I'll post it again.

Quote: 

Hey guys. I don't have a dog in this hunt, except that I lost a unit on my own in the BSU-Ore first half. The worst bad beat among what looks to have been many today.

 

Anyway, I'm here having read the ridiculous crap that Roggs has to put up with for just sharing his picks, and I have a few observations. One is that the 37-3 is misleading because of how many units are won and lost on these plays. But only a little, because it made good money last year and has a longer history than one year.

 

I'd like to go back and see how many of these are won in the first half and how many are pulled back in the second. If most years are like last year, where the second half was a better bet than the first (I think somebody said there were 11 first-half winners, meaning there were 26 second-half winners, or am I wrong about that?), the obvious question is why play the first half at all? Just wait for the second-half line (generally half of the first-half total) and hammer the under in a game that has produced way more points than expected to that point.

 

I remember there was a similar NBA play that played on 1Q dog, double-bet 2Q or game on the fave? The idea was that the fave took things a little easy until they realized they had to actually compete, then whupped the dog thereafter. 

 

Personally, the reason I don’t get involved in these double-or-nothing systems is I can’t take having 3 units up to win 1, which is the way it works a lot of the time. I think I’d just focus on second-half lines for that reason.

 

Just my two cents. I hope you guys make some serious cash this season. Ignore the haters.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #235
Quote Originally Posted by garbagetime:

I think mine was the last post, and I can't see anything either. Amazingly I just found my post in drafts (I was having all sorts of problems with the website), so I'll post it again.

Quote: 

Hey guys. I don't have a dog in this hunt, except that I lost a unit on my own in the BSU-Ore first half. The worst bad beat among what looks to have been many today.

 

Anyway, I'm here having read the ridiculous crap that Roggs has to put up with for just sharing his picks, and I have a few observations. One is that the 37-3 is misleading because of how many units are won and lost on these plays. But only a little, because it made good money last year and has a longer history than one year.

 

I'd like to go back and see how many of these are won in the first half and how many are pulled back in the second. If most years are like last year, where the second half was a better bet than the first (I think somebody said there were 11 first-half winners, meaning there were 26 second-half winners, or am I wrong about that?), the obvious question is why play the first half at all? Just wait for the second-half line (generally half of the first-half total) and hammer the under in a game that has produced way more points than expected to that point.

 

I remember there was a similar NBA play that played on 1Q dog, double-bet 2Q or game on the fave? The idea was that the fave took things a little easy until they realized they had to actually compete, then whupped the dog thereafter. 

 

Personally, the reason I don’t get involved in these double-or-nothing systems is I can’t take having 3 units up to win 1, which is the way it works a lot of the time. I think I’d just focus on second-half lines for that reason.

 

Just my two cents. I hope you guys make some serious cash this season. Ignore the haters.


Garbage thanks for the response appreciate it... i do understand your point on the 37 - 3... its also why I posted the toltal units one around 27... which obviously is not a 34 unit difference... but lets get it
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #236
Quote Originally Posted by Trapperdan33:

With the early lines I got at 5D I went 4-1 WON a 1st half U by .5 I'll check which game tomorrow. Bedtime.wait,wait.wait.
my notes show 5-1
Did I add a game by mistake?
nc at u/26
troy   u/31.5 loss/
wky   u27
org    u/30.5
csu    u/29.5
mts    u/32
I will check my 5D account later to see where I got the hook or pt.
You guys will have already found it by then. not sure what the hell I did , but came up with 6 BOWL games. Do NOT care. 5-1 going into tonight and LOVE this system!
Hope the turnovers settle down a bit.

-Trapper

Trapper I had a bunch of people DM saying that MTSU was a winner... I posted it as a loser because its the line I got... I konw a ton of people who actually had 31.5 or 32 with their first half mtsu spread and this system was actually profitable for them in a small way in the first day...  also I a stated a couple pages back before the crickets chimed in that the nc at game I did not consider a real bowl... for those that played that game it did win... 

there are a lot of people that did play that game and got a better line then I did with MTSU based on when they put that halftime play in...

But since I am a man of integrity I will post my system record at 3 - 2 down a couple units because that is what happened to me... lets get it tonight
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #237
As far as tonights game - I see no point of locking this in before after dinner east coast time... let the points keep rising... In saying that its a pure guessing game... I did not guess right in mtsu :0
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #238
Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:

As far as tonights game - I see no point of locking this in before after dinner east coast time... let the points keep rising... In saying that its a pure guessing game... I did not guess right in mtsu :0

Under 34.5 fau... Locked

Crazy these totals been falling of late... Maybe its the crickets lol 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2015
Posts: 92
Posted: #239
Roggs, Not sure if this happened last year but if somehow 1st half is a push , is there a 2nd half play for 1 or 2 units ? Or are we just moving onto the next game 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 19113
Posted: #240
Let's get this win..........
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #241
Quote Originally Posted by ThinkingCappers:

Roggs, Not sure if this happened last year but if somehow 1st half is a push , is there a 2nd half play for 1 or 2 units ? Or are we just moving onto the next game 

Great question... Addressed earlier in,thread but will repeat cuz important... Push you stop... Not 1 first half pushed last year
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4793
Posted: #242

So far so good.........2 missed FG's

That up tempo offense FAU has worries me though - they can score quick.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4793
Posted: #243

So far so good.........2 missed FG's

That up tempo offense FAU has worries me though - they can score quick.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 19113
Posted: #244
So far so good bud
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2017
Posts: 329
Posted: #245
Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:

One thing I just noticed is it looks like sometime this weekend covers changed its formats of the forums... It might have cut off a bunch of posts... Anyways slow start we in this for long haul...

3 - 2 this year to start system... -3.3 units... long way to go
I got -3.8 units, but its just the beginning, like you said, long way to go
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 286
Posted: #246
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #247
Little less stressful tonight then day 1... Catch yall tomorrow... Cheers to the marathon
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 554
Posted: #248
Boom! Let’s go
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 692
Posted: #249

SWEET!!!!!!!!!moneybag Thanks for clearing that up Roggs. This is both FUN and Profitable.moneyeyes The Hobbits most likely blew half their BR tring to get rich the first day.an_roll_laughThis upset them.new_angry_teethNow they have retreated to the Shire, or to a Trolls cave, or wherever they go to whine.an_baby  We can now enjoy this thread and system. an_2drinks It's what BOWL season is all about.an_happydude

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 687
Posted: #250
The silence is crazy
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.