All Forums | College Football

2019 Bowl Under Systerm :)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 52797
Posts: 269
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 445
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by chazutx:

Rough start for the system...0-3 so far.


2-1 so far 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #52
Lol that fg

2xs under 21.5 ga southern

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2018
Posts: 617
Posted: #53
You bet 1.1 units to win 1 first half and if it loses you bet 2.2 on the second half. So you end up betting 3.3 units to win .9 units, which would be roughly equal to betting a -400 ml favorite. Gl with that.
It's nice to have a president with balls and a first lady without them.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 503
Posted: #54

Quote Originally Posted by HashToker:

You bet 1.1 units to win 1 first half and if it loses you bet 2.2 on the second half. So you end up betting 3.3 units to win .9 units, which would be roughly equal to betting a -400 ml favorite. Gl with that.
this system could be a shortcut to bankruptcy court.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #55
Moderator please. ... 6 years straight clowns come hating
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #56
Under 24 mtsu

Lol we get thru this day it will be legendary
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 310
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:

Under 24 mtsuLol we get thru this day it will be legendary

Damn. I really thought we were going to breathe easy at least for this last game. However, still the system is 3-1 on the day with one pending. Currently, if bet correctly, one would be up about +1.52u (depending on your lines of course but I went with the best line available of my four books (BetOnline, BookMaker, 5Dimes, BetDSI).

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 5849
Posted: #58
All 5 games 1h went over 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 292
Posted: #59
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney777:

Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money

 

1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units)

2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4)

Total loss so far -3.9 units


Ha...

Dm me and side bet?  Easy to run ur mouth... Lets go?  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2018
Posts: 53
Posted: #61

I have to agree. Although I want everyone to kick the mans ass, this system is too risky.   Suicide and one will go broke real quick. Maybe, just a rough start but. Man. I play first half for 55 and second half for 110.  I’m quite certain I can add as I’m down -$80.  The system didn’t even look promising.  Man 3 or 4 more days like this and your broke before the playoffs start.  I do wish all luck as this is one opportunity that I will pass...  way more value elsewhere...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 242
Posted: #62

The issue with this trend is it looks cool going 30-8 or whatever but if you lose 8 games you end up losing money on the season even with winning 30

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 216
Posted: #63

definitely a tough start. Seems like it always is this way then it starts smoothing out. My heart couldn't handle all the stress on how close every one of these bets was. In this for the long run. Let's keep at it.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 310
Posted: #64

2018 CFB 1H Under Chase System Results

1H: 0-5 (-5.47u)

2H: 3-2 (+1.35u)

Combined 1H + 2H Results: 3-7 (-4.12u)

System Only Results: 3-2 (-4.12u

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 310
Posted: #65

12/15/18 Sat

1:30pm Louisiana Lafayette vs Tulane (Cure Bowl)

1H U31 (-105 BookMaker): 34 pts scored / Lost -1.05u

2H U28 (-115 5Dimes; -110 BetDSI): 31 pts scored / Lost -2.47u

Total: -3.52u

 

2:00pm North Texas vs Utah St. (New Mexico Bowl)

1H U35 (-110 5Dimes/BetOnline): 45 pts scored / Lost -1.1u

2H U28.5 (-125 BetOnline/BookMaker): 20 pts scored / Won +2.1u

Total: +1

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 310
Posted: #66

3:30pm Arizona St. vs Fresno St. (Las Vegas Bowl)

1H U27.5 (-118 BookMaker): 34 pts scored / Lost -1.18u

2H U27 (+100 5Dimes): 17 pts scored / Won +2.18u

Total: +1u

 

5:30pm Georgia Southern vs Eastern Michigan (Camellia Bowl)

1H U23 (-105 5Dimes): 24 pts scored / Lost -1.05u

2H U21.5 (-107 5Dimes): 20 pts scored / Won +2.05u

Total: +1u

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 310
Posted: #67

9:00pm Middle Tenn. vs Appalachian St. (New Orleans Bowl)

1H U24 (-109 BookMaker): 30 pts scored / Lost -1.09u

2H U24 (-120 BetDSI; BookMaker; BetOnline; 5Dimes); 28 pts scored / Lost -2.51u

Total: -3.6u

 

Next Bowls

12/18/18 Tue - Boca Raton Bowl

12/19/18 Wed - Frisco Bowl

12/20/18 Thu - Gasparilla Bowl

12/21/18 Fri - Bahamas Bowl; Idaho Potato Bowl

12/22/18 Sat - Birmingham Bowl; Armed Forces Bowl; Dollar General Bowl; Hawaii Bowl

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 310
Posted: #68

Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability. 

Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago.

Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it. 

However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB.

I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies.

Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2017
Posts: 1867
Posted: #69

Thanks for taking the L's these past games boys, I mean no disrespect by that I do appreciate it, will now jump on this system starting tomorrow. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10216
Posted: #70

Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:

Moderator please. ... 6 years straight clowns come hating
Rough start,,, IGGY those ass clowns that bash this system buddy. What we, are like 4 bowl. games in.. Clowns are already bashing it,, LOL.. Like 30 more games to go,, so that makes 60 wagers,, to go,, vs 8 wagers .. So they are declaring the system no good? Idiots.. All good Roggs,,, iggy them

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 842
Posted: #71
Northern Illinois Under 21.5 first half 1xs

Koreanmang - Awesome work!  Thanks for tracking...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10216
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney777:

Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money   1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units) 2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4) Total loss so far -3.9 units
The system kicked ass for 2 yrs.. flat last year I think,, To come in here and bash it is not cool,, There are many of games to go... like 60 more wagers o this system and you are claiming no good? There has only been  what 4 bowl games played? so that is 8 wagers vs 60 to go,, You can not claim the system has failed,,  you are smarter than that my friend,,

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10216
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by thekoreanmang:

Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability.  Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago. Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it.  However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB. I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies. Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
makes sense I was thinking the same way as yourself,,

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 503
Posted: #74

Quote Originally Posted by GoldjaBoy:

Quote Originally Posted by thekoreanmang:

Apologies for any errors. Just wanted to share what I've been keeping for myself to assess profitability.  Probably won't be able to keep it up but will try to share what and when I can. Thanks to Roggs05 for getting us clued into the system some years ago. Also, I've been wondering if it would be smart to consider the teams' offensive styles because the premise of this system relies on one angle which is that elongated periods of time between games creates "rust" in team's offenses. However, this would seem true typically of offenses who rely more on the pass than the run. Offenses relying on the pass involve timing, chemistry, QB to receiver connection, whatever you want to call it.  However, I would imagine that offenses that rely on the run need much less timing. Any such timing is within the ability of one player, the RB. This is juxtaposed to offenses relying on the pass whose timing relies on two players: the QB and the WR/TE/RB. I thought this as I watched Gerogia Southern who is definitely a strong running team and has almost no passing game to speak of. They killed both halves offensively. However, my issue is that I don't know most of these teams playing so I'd have to dig a little more on each matchup but I guess it's not that much more work given it won't take long to assess a given team's general offensive strategies. Anyway, just some thoughts. Would love to hear others'.
makes sense I was thinking the same way as yourself,,
 why not watch first half and bet second half accordingly?

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33046
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by BigMoney777:

Time to shut it down buddy...stop pimping this garage and losing everyones money   1st halves 0-5 (-5.5 units) 2nd halves 3-2 (6.0 - 4.4) Total loss so far -3.9 units
HE isn't losing anyone's money. That is beyond stupid tp say. People are responsible for their own bets. So many are looking for an easy way to win. No one is being forced to follow this. They can make the choice themselves. Pretty phucking simple

Here is a thought. Worry about YOUR money. Let others worry about THEIR money. IF they follow and they lose, that's the decision they made

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.