Alabama

@usikbasterd

 -110 and -115 is no big deal to you. Enough said stupid statement

@vanzack

These guys keep books open. Let them throw their money at em. In addition, you are a professional gambler and they are not.  I think that is the biggest difference here. You do it for a living, they do it for the thrill. 

Although, one common theme between you and them today is Alabama. I also like the tide today. I have +2.5 at -104. Like you, I appreciate a good line. 

Cheers and BOL to everyone. 

@vanzack

 I’ve been betting for over 20yrs. You can’t tell me nothing. if it works for some people, it works. Me and okman r similar in a way that if we like our picks, we will jam it and capitalize. Just cuz this is different style than yours, doesn’t mean it’s wrong. And stop acting like you smarter than everybody, doesn’t add inches to ur wee wee. 

@Huss

 If that is Good thinking to you, then it’s Good thinking for you!!!!!

I’ll show all you broke boys and penny pinchers my tickets any day of the week. Tell me who the loser is then. My lowest wager is 1k, you think I care about the difference between -110 and -115?

Post of the year (it is only 14 hours old).

@Kaufee

@usikbasterd

 Thank you for this. There’s more than one way to skin a cat. These guys don’t realize that. They hate just to hate 

Your smallest bet is 1K  and you don't care about the difference between -110 n -115 ?

You may want to show them the difference in break even  between odds of

- 110 , -115 and - 120 . Then ask them what their record is for the past

10 years. They may understand that.  

@vanzack

 Just out of curiosity, you only post spread, but not the juice line on games why is that?!!!!! But, here you are debating about what odds to take!!!!! And, yet, I post the spread plus the juice!!!!!

Have to agree with this. When we got legalized betting in my state I was immediately limited by DK, BetMGM, and PointsBet. I’m not a crusher by any means. FanDuel and Caesars still take significant action from me. 

@WISEGUY36

When you say they will understand that, I think you are greatly overestimating the wisdom of this pitchfork crowd.

  I probably am. Notice I said " they may understand 

@vanzack

 Truth

Good question.

If you look at the lines I post, I try to target minus 103 widely available. So if there is any question at all, I post the least advantageous line to keep the price down.

Everyone gets different prices. I would never Make a wager into a minus 110 market, 20 cent spread. There are books like bookmaker, low vig, and exchanges where you can get as low as a $0.01 spread, and that's where I bet.

It would be unfair for me to post my prices, because they are probably better than what you would get. So I post widely available lines at average of -103.

By the way, the difference between minus 103, and the mouth breather in this thread who said he wins on -115, is it -103 you have to win about 51% of your bets, and minus 115 you have to win about 55% of your bets.

-110 52.38%  55-45 makes 5500, 53-47 makes 1300

-115 53.48%  55-45 makes 3250, 53-47 loses 1050

-120 54.54%  55-45 makes 1000, 53-47 loses 3400

That’s a big difference. Getting -110 instead of -120 is like winning four extra bets…

@vanzack

 So classy calling others mouth breathers but you’re whole rant about “retarded” gets your panties in a bunch. So much hypocrisy 

Vanzack - just call him a knuckle dragger next time. Where I come from both are derogatory terms 

Today, 4-11!!!!!

Well done. That's the break even math. Now how many of you arguing

with vanzack have a better than a 55 %  record over the past 10 years.

At least now you can calculate how much more you lost wagering at

- 115 v, - 120 over your sports betting career.

Class dismissed.. 

I find it hard to believe there are people betting more than 1k per game that don’t understand basic math. Maybe millionaires with money to burn 

I just went through your bets posted and you went 4 - 11 

Make money? 

Hope you do better in Alabama Michigan and if you like BAMA so much, best to just pound the OVER coming up to get back some losses !!

BOL  ...all the best 

@Last2thirst

It's really a question of losing less when you lose, and winning more when you win.

I'm not criticizing okay man for his picks, I'm just saying he could lose less or win more for the same exact thing. Who wouldn't want that?

Adding Oregon under 60.5 -110 live