All Forums | College Football

ALABAMA VS NOTRE DAME

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 42064
Posts: 211
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #126

Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:



Ok.


Message error try to send me PM

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 4807
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by Regionboy64:

I hope when all is said and done the Irish are National Champions. I have read nothing but crap from you people on this page and you don't give ND a chance at all. Good. All the SEC people think that their conference is composed of God and his minions. I got some news for you country having sex with your sister no style clothes wearing assholes. The Irish will win by 6. Yeah fuckheads I said it!

Not happening
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #128

Quote Originally Posted by tideman:

Not happening

It's why they play the games. We will know Jan 7 all lip flapping aside.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 190
Posted: #129
Notre dame matches up better with Alabama than they would have against uga. Big and physical on the defensive line too. I do NOT think this will be a 2 touchdown game.

NOTRE DAME +10
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 22266
Posted: #130
How is ND a perfect match up for Alabama? 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 6336
Posted: #131

Quote Originally Posted by mafioso:

Jimmy, no disrespect but Ill take that bet, You have given Notre Dame no credit for the schedule they played this year, It wasnt there fault Barkley was injured when they played USC.
They beat every team they played, and they did blow out the weaker teams like Navy,and wake forest
they also put pretty good beat downs on Oklahoma and Miami.

Bama barely beat LSU, Lost to A&M and barely beat Georgia

Ahh yes they blew out a bunch of horrible teams
Tennessee
Arkansas
W-Kentucky
W-Carolina that was laughable
Fl-Atlantic
Auburn

You are all looking at the big wins but you all fail to see who they played, the only competent teams they played, they beat by a combined 8 points
and you think they are gonna run all over Notre Dame?
You were right about one thing friend,
When you said
Vegas is giving away free money, Yes they are if you are taking Notre Dame
Mafioso looking at who ND has played this year don't think Bama would lose to any of those teams IMO.

LSU is a pretty tough place to play (win)  @ night and the QB for A&M is pretty good.  Georgia very solid team.

I honestly didn't think ND would win outright against the Sooners.

We'll see what happens JAN 7 that's why they play the games on the field not PAPER.

GL on your wager and enjoy the game Buddy

Enjoy reading some of your posts in the vegas forum.

 

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1084
Posted: #132
Originally Posted by BLOODandTHUNDER

Stanford has defense and a guy named Taylor that's pretty good in the backfield.


Notre Dame got the W but we all saw who won that game...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #133

Quote Originally Posted by kahuna57:

Originally Posted by BLOODandTHUNDER

Stanford has defense and a guy named Taylor that's pretty good in the backfield.


Notre Dame got the W but we all saw who won that game...

We all did see. ND won. This is such a pathetic arguement it makes me worry for the future of this country. You're trying to rewrite history from  a couple of months ago. Dumb dumb even if that TD had counted all it did was TIE the game not win the game. You don't know wtf you are talking about. Have a great day.

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 2664
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by BLOODandTHUNDER:

We all did see. ND won. This is such a pathetic arguement it makes me worry for the future of this country.


Worry friend be very worried

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #135
Quote Originally Posted by mafioso:


Worry friend be very worried

I am and I am not even that old

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 4525
Posted: #136

interesting debate...surprised people are betting each other rather than the book but i guess its the same thing with no juice...ok now i get it....anyways my take is this>.notre dame better play a HELL of A GAME to stay within the current number of 10....big plays favor alabama so does the defense and running game...could and should and will  get ugly   love that the irish had a great season   dont make me write another "10 top reasons Alabama WINS" post like i did last year    

ps  jimmy you and i need ta go avatar shoppin' man!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1084
Posted: #137
We all did see. ND won. This is such a pathetic arguement it makes me worry for the future of this country. You're trying to rewrite history from  a couple of months ago. Dumb dumb even if that TD had counted all it did was TIE the game not win the game. You don't know wtf you are talking about. Have a great day.

Wow! Wasn't even trying to get under your skin. I would retaliate but we are on the web....lol..............big guy! Lmfao!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 6
Posted: #138
hey bloodandthunder. i sent you a friend request. we need to get down on that NC game..let me know
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2081
Posted: #139
I hope Bamako rolls
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 1645
Posted: #140

Roll-Tide

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #141

Quote Originally Posted by kahuna57:

We all did see. ND won. This is such a pathetic arguement it makes me worry for the future of this country. You're trying to rewrite history from  a couple of months ago. Dumb dumb even if that TD had counted all it did was TIE the game not win the game. You don't know wtf you are talking about. Have a great day.

Wow! Wasn't even trying to get under your skin. I would retaliate but we are on the web....lol..............big guy! Lmfao!

Just don't understand why people on insisting that ND didn't win that game. That if Taylor had scored ND would have lost. FYI I am a large human being haha.

Best of Luck with your wagers during bowl season

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #142

Quote Originally Posted by thesouth:

hey bloodandthunder. i sent you a friend request. we need to get down on that NC game..let me know

Ok what would you like to get down on in regards to this game?

I already have my bankroll overextended on the Irish.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by ROVIN56:

interesting debate...surprised people are betting each other rather than the book but i guess its the same thing with no juice...ok now i get it....anyways my take is this>.notre dame better play a HELL of A GAME to stay within the current number of 10....big plays favor alabama so does the defense and running game...could and should and will  get ugly   love that the irish had a great season   dont make me write another "10 top reasons Alabama WINS" post like i did last year    

ps  jimmy you and i need ta go avatar shoppin' man!

Bama better play a hell of game or they are going to lose.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 1645
Posted: #144

N.D.  scuedule 2012

Navy     50-10 

Navy lost to N.D, Penn St, San Jose St, Troy and has a record of 7-4 pending the Army game saturday.

Purdue     20-17 

Purdue lost to N.D, Penn St, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio St, Minnesota and finished 6-6.

Michigan St     20-3

Michigan St lost to N.D, Michigan, Ohio St, Iowa, Nebraska, Northwestern and finished 6-6.

Michigan     13-6

Michigan lost to Alabama, N.D, Nebraska, Ohio St and finished 8-4.

Miami      41-3

Miami lost to K St, N.D, Florida St, N. Carloina, Virgina and finished 7-5.

Stanford     20-13    >>>   OT

Stanford lost to N.D, Washington, and finished 10-2.

BYU     17-14 

BYU lost to Utah, Boise St, Oregon St, N.D, San Jose St and finished 7-5.

Oklahoma    30-13

Oklahoma lost to K. St, N.D, and finished 10-2.

Pittsbrugh     29-26    >>>>    OT

Pittsburgh lost to Youngstown, Cincinnati, Syracuse, Louisville, N.D, Connecticut and finished 6-6.

B.C      21-6

B.C lost to Miami, Northwestern, Clemson, Army, Florida St, Georgia Tech, Wake Forest, N.D, Virgina, N.C St and finished 2-10.

Wake Forest   38-0

Wake Forest lost to Florida St, Duke, Maryland, Clemson, N.C St, N.D, Vanderbilt and finished 5-7.

USC    22-13

USC lost to Stanford, Arizona, Oregon, UCLA, N.D and finished 7-5.

 

 

Alabama scuedule 2012

Michigan   41-14

Michigan lost to Alabama, Nebraska, Ohio St, N.D and finished 8-4.

Western Kentucky   35-0

Western Kentucky lost to Alabama, ULM, Middle Tenn, Florida Atl, La. Laf and finished 7-5.

Arkansas   52-0 

Arkansas lost to Alabama, ULM, Rutgers, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, S.C, Miss St, LSU, and finished 4-8.

Florida Alt    40-7

Florida Atl lost to Alabama, Middle Tenn, Georgia, ULM, South Alabama, Navy, Florida Int, La. Laf and finished 4-8.

Ole Miss    33-14

Ole Miss lost to Alabama, Texas, Georgia, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, LSU, and finished 6-6.

Missouri     42-10

Missouri lost to Alabama, Georgia, S.C, Vanderbilt, Florida, Teaxs A&M, Syracuse 5-7.

Tennessee    44-13

Tennessee lost to Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Miss St, S.C, Missouri, Vanderbilt, and finished 5-7.

Mississippi St     38-7

Miss St lost to Alabama, Texas A&M, LSU, Ole Miss and finished 8-4.

LSU    21-17

LSU lost to Alabama, Florida, and finished 10-2.

Texas A&M    29-24

Texas A&M lost to LSU, Florida, and finished 10-2.

Western Carolina    49-0

Western Carolina lost to Alabama, Furman, Marshall, Wofford, Samford, Georgia South, Citadel, Elon, Appalachian St, Chattanooga, 1-10

Auburn    49-0

Auburn lost to Alabama, LSU, Arkansas, Clemson, Miss St, Ole Miss, Vanderbilt, Texas A&M, Georgia, 3-9.

 

 

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 2664
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by ROVIN56:

interesting debate...surprised people are betting each other rather than the book but i guess its the same thing with no juice...ok now i get it....anyways my take is this>.notre dame better play a HELL of A GAME to stay within the current number of 10....big plays favor alabama so does the defense and running game...could and should and will  get ugly   love that the irish had a great season   dont make me write another "10 top reasons Alabama WINS" post like i did last year    

ps  jimmy you and i need ta go avatar shoppin' man!



Actually I am betting this game at an actual sportsbook Ill be in vegas that weekend, Jan 4 thru Jan 8
It was just ridiculous and it shows that loyalty can blind good cappers, to say Ill give you 13.5 and Bama will score more than they punt is just asinine.

I took the bet to show him he will lose money on it and I dont need the extra points,

I doubt he really wants to do it since he has yet to accept a friends request and exchange addresses, I wont push the issue as I truly feel he is way over his head in thinking that Bama will dominate possibly one of the most resilient if nit one of the best defensive team in College football this decade.

So if he doesnt want to actually do this, Its fine with me, Ill be in vegas laughing my behind off at all the bama SEC fish that are gonna lose there money.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5702
Posted: #146
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:



I would bet on every bowl-eligible team in the SEC to beat Notre Dame except maybe Mississippi State and Vandy.  Alabama vs. Notre Dame has zero shot of being a competitive game.  But instead of lining up to take the free money the books are handing out, the sheeple will again fall all over themselves to fade the SEC team, even when this game will be the biggest mismatch since Florida/Ohio State.




This Irish team is not that much different from TAM vs bama earlier TY nor is it a farfetch from a colts vs saints superbowl. Could it be your blindness for SEC love that is clouding your judgement from picking a winner outside of the SEC? 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by choiOi:



This Irish team is not that much different from TAM vs bama earlier TY nor is it a farfetch from a colts vs saints superbowl. Could it be your blindness for SEC love that is clouding your judgement from picking a winner outside of the SEC? 

Blindness.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #148
Bama could cover two scores. Duh. Yet Bama won't score at will. Like the under, as this looks to be a slugfest. Ugly boxing match with booth team disrupting the others best plays and game breakers. Both teams can rush, and Bama usu gets yards after first contact. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #149

Was leaning under but I really like the over at this point. Total is too low. Both teams will score in the low 20's.

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #150
Quote Originally Posted by poolman11:

 10,5 really?
The line is not 10.5. The line is 9.5 across most major sites. He didn't put a bet in on 12/1 so why should anyone honor a line that is a point greater than what everyone will have to bet on (and crosses the important threshold of 10 to give him the backdoor cover if necessary).

If he posts +9.5, then the pick can be honored, but no one got it at 10.5 so this is a bogus post.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.