All Forums | College Football

An undefeated FSU would play undefeated Bama for title.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6068
Posts: 99
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #26
motowner says:

washington over oregon straight up

ACC better than the PAC

i never commented in your threads let alone read them.

0-3

what a loser.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #27
meanwhile, i am 21-17 at 55% and up $3700+ dollars.

i am a GOD compared to you.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 163
Posted: #28
Oregon even did it without De' Anthony Thomas 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

motowner says:

washington over oregon straight up

ACC better than the PAC

i never commented in your threads let alone read them.

0-3

what a loser.


i forgot that you also did not bet A&M +9.5 and Purdue +20.5 when i posted them because you were waiting for better lines on both.

all the lines did after i bet them was drop, drop drop.

you cannot even time your wagers correctly by reading the market.

man you suck cawk balls at this!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:



the operative word is "comment", not complimented.  i said "complimented" but you said "commented".

you said you have not commented in my threads let alone read them, and i just bumped three threads right away where you commented.

nice washington pick over oregon.

you suck at this.


you've been absolutely humiliated yet again.

it wasn't enough that 30 or so different posters already humiliated you over the weekend, so apparently you need more..

not a single thread of proof where i've "complimented" you.

yet you claim i "keep complimenting" you in your threads.

so naturally it should be pretty easy for you to find a whole bunch of links where i've paid you all of this supposed "compliments".

yet you don't have any links? why is that?

38% documented loser that you are.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #31
I slept through the weekend.... Did Washington beat Oregon like you said?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 352
Posted: #32

Quote Originally Posted by motowner:



good luck to you guys. i think you're better than Clemson, but Death Valley at night is always the ultimate challenge.

you'll get the #2 BCS spot at the end of the year if you run the table according to the math guys.

the computers love the strength of the ACC.

that being said, an undefeated Clemson would also get the #2 ahead of Oregon as well.


The computers do not love the ACC. 2 of the computers have the ACC 4th in their rankings behind the Big 10. ( Colley and Sagarin). the ACC is 3-6 OOC vs the Pac, B1G, SEC, and Big 12 including 0-2 vs the Pac. They are 33-10 OOC vs the Pac 12's 29-5. No chance ACC is ranked higher than the Pac. NONE

Florida State will have a hard time jumping OSU let alone Oregon.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Cornholio711:

The computers do not love the ACC. 2 of the computers have the ACC 4th in their rankings behind the Big 10. ( Colley and Sagarin). the ACC is 3-6 OOC vs the Pac, B1G, SEC, and Big 12 including 0-2 vs the Pac. They are 33-10 OOC vs the Pac 12's 29-5. No chance ACC is ranked higher than the Pac. NONE

Florida State will have a hard time jumping OSU let alone Oregon.



the OP does not believe in computers or anything logical that shows the ACC is clearly behind the PAC in conf ranking.  he also belies the voters who clearly believe more in Oregon than FSU.

however, all of this will be moot after FSU loses to Clemson sat and likely Miami after that.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 52
Posted: #34
Fsu won't get passed miami
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by Cornholio711:

The computers do not love the ACC. 2 of the computers have the ACC 4th in their rankings behind the Big 10. ( Colley and Sagarin). the ACC is 3-6 OOC vs the Pac, B1G, SEC, and Big 12 including 0-2 vs the Pac. They are 33-10 OOC vs the Pac 12's 29-5. No chance ACC is ranked higher than the Pac. NONE

Florida State will have a hard time jumping OSU let alone Oregon.



once again, this is about the ratings projected at season end.

once again, current ratings positions have nothing to do with this discussion.

once again, an undefeated FSU/Clemson winner would be the #2 BCS team behind Alabama at season end as projected by the BCS math experts.




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:



the OP does not believe in computers or anything logical that shows the ACC is clearly behind the PAC in conf ranking.  he also belies the voters who clearly believe more in Oregon than FSU.

however, all of this will be moot after FSU loses to Clemson sat and likely Miami after that.


it doesn't matter if FSU beats or loses to Clemson. if the winner of the FSU-Clemson game runs the table, they'll be the #2 BCS team behind Alabama. pretty simple. but reading comprehension clearly isn't your friend.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54468
Posted: #37

Nobody wants to see Bama/FSU (other than FSU homers)

EVERYBODY wants to see Bama/Oregon.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Nobody wants to see Bama/FSU (other than FSU homers)

EVERYBODY wants to see Bama/Oregon.

 


the computers don't have feelings or desires

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 352
Posted: #39

Quote Originally Posted by motowner:



once again, this is about the ratings projected at season end.

once again, current ratings positions have nothing to do with this discussion.

once again, an undefeated FSU/Clemson winner would be the #2 BCS team behind Alabama at season end as projected by the BCS math experts.




Once again, current ratings and records do have something to do with this. The ACC can't get back their 3-6 OOC record. the Pac 12 can't lose games that have already been played. The conference rankings are all about OOC winning %. The ACC's rankings are going to get worse.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 89
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Nobody wants to see Bama/FSU (other than FSU homers)

EVERYBODY wants to see Bama/Oregon.

 


I don't know many people wishing for Bama/Oregon.  Any thoughts that Oregon could hang with Bama are absurd.  Oregon's offense doesn't scheme well with the big boys.  Just look at their bowl record over the last decade.  0-1 against SEC (average points scored 19), 0-1 against ACC (average points scored 17).  0-1 against MWC (average points scored 8.  1-2 against Big 10 (average points scored 31). 3-2 against BIG12 (average points scored 32).  Alabama wins easily, about 41-23.  That's why there is a growing consensus by many that Oregon shouldn't go.

An undefeated FSU/Clemson/OSU or a 1-loss SEC team would be much more favorable and provide a much better game.  Hands down.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by Cornholio711:

Once again, current ratings and records do have something to do with this. The ACC can't get back their 3-6 OOC record. the Pac 12 can't lose games that have already been played. The conference rankings are all about OOC winning %. The ACC's rankings are going to get worse.



is that why a theoretical undefeated ACC team is projected to finish #2 in the BCS ahead of theoretical undefeated Oregon at year end?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1994
Posted: #42
[Quote: Originally Posted by TRAIN69]

Nobody wants to see Bama/FSU (other than FSU homers)

EVERYBODY wants to see Bama/Oregon.

 

 

exact train  100 % huge huge offense vs good  D and good O

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1717
Posted: #43
This whole thread is a joke. As long as Bama and Oregon keep winning, they will play for BCS championship. Nobody and knows anything doubts this. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 828
Posted: #44
BAMA loses final game @ Auburn. U heard it hear first. Late loss knocks BAMA out of National Championship game. Malzahn's Tigers getting stronger and stronger every week. Talk about a perfect spot for an upset. They havent beat BAMA since 2010. I think BAMA fans are sleeping on them. And in the end u can blame the loss on the soft schedule for BAMA. There is no reason to be playing Chattanooga Week 13. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9147
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by Mr-Stache:

BAMA loses final game @ Auburn. U heard it hear first. Late loss knocks BAMA out of National Championship game. Malzahn's Tigers getting stronger and stronger every week. Talk about a perfect spot for an upset. They havent beat BAMA since 2010. I think BAMA fans are sleeping on them. And in the end u can blame the loss on the soft schedule for BAMA. There is no reason to be playing Chattanooga Week 13. 


Please keep whatever you're smoking off the streets. Bama losing to Auburn in the Iron Bowl. Yea right. Maybe if cammy cam and company were still at Auburn.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9147
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by ccbulldog:

This whole thread is a joke. As long as Bama and Oregon keep winning, they will play for BCS championship. Nobody and knows anything doubts this. 


IDK if FSU beats Clemson this wknd and Oregon State doesnt man handle Wazzu I think FSU jumps them to the number 2 spot.

Also lets be real Oregon will find a way to f*ck it up like always cause theyre secretly scurred of Bama, also people wants to see chip kellys ducks vs sabans crimson tide, i'm not sure it has the same hype to it with kelly being gone.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9147
Posted: #47
that should clearly say Oregon. Would edit it but no edit feature. Had wazzu state on the mind probably.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 828
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by eliminat0r85:



Please keep whatever you're smoking off the streets. Bama losing to Auburn in the Iron Bowl. Yea right. Maybe if cammy cam and company were still at Auburn.

Yea, Im smoking something. The same sh*t the Jim Leyland was smoking bringing in Benoit the righty, instead of Coke the lefty vs Big Poppi.. Lets see...  Ortiz .260 vs Left 7HR in 196 ABs or vs Right .339 23 HRs in 332 ABs.  I want some of what he was smoking. 

So ur saying Auburn doesnt have a chance????
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9147
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by Mr-Stache:


Yea, Im smoking something. The same sh*t the Jim Leyland was smoking bringing in Benoit the righty, instead of Coke the lefty vs Big Poppi.. Lets see...  Ortiz .260 vs Left 7HR in 196 ABs or vs Right .339 23 HRs in 332 ABs.  I want some of what he was smoking. 

So ur saying Auburn doesnt have a chance????


Its clearly some horrible garbage then if you advocate bringing coke or benoit into any game with big papi able to tie it. I would have walked his behind. I'm not a baseball manager though what do i know.

Yes I'm saying auburn loses by at least 2 TD's
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 411
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by wespalmore0415:


I don't know many people wishing for Bama/Oregon.  Any thoughts that Oregon could hang with Bama are absurd.  Oregon's offense doesn't scheme well with the big boys.  Just look at their bowl record over the last decade.  0-1 against SEC (average points scored 19), 0-1 against ACC (average points scored 17).  0-1 against MWC (average points scored 8.  1-2 against Big 10 (average points scored 31). 3-2 against BIG12 (average points scored 32).  Alabama wins easily, about 41-23.  That's why there is a growing consensus by many that Oregon shouldn't go.

An undefeated FSU/Clemson/OSU or a 1-loss SEC team would be much more favorable and provide a much better game.  Hands down.

You have a future in comedy. Is Tennessee an SEC team? Did Oregon not win BCS games last two years? If Alabama had to go undefeated how many titles would they have?
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.