commentators are clearly on Auburn or just rooting for them. they deserved to be fired for making such biased comments and opinions on a key play of a game.
Dude you couldn't see the ball. I'm on Arkansas but the announcers were 100% RIGHT. Whatever was ruled on the field has to stand. The fucking bs was them changing it on the field.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jon100:
commentators are clearly on Auburn or just rooting for them. they deserved to be fired for making such biased comments and opinions on a key play of a game.
Dude you couldn't see the ball. I'm on Arkansas but the announcers were 100% RIGHT. Whatever was ruled on the field has to stand. The fucking bs was them changing it on the field.
Dude you couldn't see the ball. I'm on Arkansas but the announcers were 100% RIGHT. Whatever was ruled on the field has to stand. The fucking bs was them changing it on the field.
are you blind? the question you should be asking is, did you ever see the ball cross the damn line in any of those camera angels.
there were two angles that clearly showed the ball going out of his hands STRAIGHT DOWN before crossing the line.
just because you couldn't see the ball, doesn't mean it crossed it, ...there was no evidence that the ball crossed the line...but there were evidence that the ball dropped be4 crossing the plain. think about it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Dude you couldn't see the ball. I'm on Arkansas but the announcers were 100% RIGHT. Whatever was ruled on the field has to stand. The fucking bs was them changing it on the field.
are you blind? the question you should be asking is, did you ever see the ball cross the damn line in any of those camera angels.
there were two angles that clearly showed the ball going out of his hands STRAIGHT DOWN before crossing the line.
just because you couldn't see the ball, doesn't mean it crossed it, ...there was no evidence that the ball crossed the line...but there were evidence that the ball dropped be4 crossing the plain. think about it.
are you blind? the question you should be asking is, did you ever see the ball cross the damn line in any of those camera angels.
there were two angles that clearly showed the ball going out of his hands STRAIGHT DOWN before crossing the line.
just because you couldn't see the ball, doesn't mean it crossed it, ...there was no evidence that the ball crossed the line...but there were evidence that the ball dropped be4 crossing the plain. think about it.
Your COMPLETELY missing the point. When you rule it a td on the field, you are looking to see if the ball crossed, you are looking for indisputable evidence the ball CAME OUT before crossing and you can't see the ball. Yes, we know it was a fumble but because you can't see the ball, you can't over turn the call.
I have Arkansas and probably have way more on it then you do. The problem was the INITIAL CALL ON THE FIELD, not the review. So saying the announcers are in on it is just stupid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jon100:
are you blind? the question you should be asking is, did you ever see the ball cross the damn line in any of those camera angels.
there were two angles that clearly showed the ball going out of his hands STRAIGHT DOWN before crossing the line.
just because you couldn't see the ball, doesn't mean it crossed it, ...there was no evidence that the ball crossed the line...but there were evidence that the ball dropped be4 crossing the plain. think about it.
Your COMPLETELY missing the point. When you rule it a td on the field, you are looking to see if the ball crossed, you are looking for indisputable evidence the ball CAME OUT before crossing and you can't see the ball. Yes, we know it was a fumble but because you can't see the ball, you can't over turn the call.
I have Arkansas and probably have way more on it then you do. The problem was the INITIAL CALL ON THE FIELD, not the review. So saying the announcers are in on it is just stupid.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.