Thanks I appreciate the info. I hated picking three teams from 3PM through midnight, but liked the top 10 teams favored by less than 10 to cover. I'll look more into the 4th team scenario to get the 3 pts
0
Thanks I appreciate the info. I hated picking three teams from 3PM through midnight, but liked the top 10 teams favored by less than 10 to cover. I'll look more into the 4th team scenario to get the 3 pts
Then I pick the strongest play at that time slot unless there is an 'anchor' team which I think will cover 99.99% of the time then I throw it in all of them.
looking at the slate now for example......two stick out like a sore thumb:
#1) OVER Nebraska
#2) UNDER Central Mich
It takes an act of god for me to take an under in college football. Last two unders I took were under in colts game sunday and last week the under in the BYU game.
Central mich vs Miami (ohio): You have the 119th offense in the country in Ohio and 104th offense in Cent mich. You can tease the 48 to 60.5 in a teaser of 13 pts.
C mich has scored: 9, 21, 21, 17, 14.
Miami O has scored: 14, 7, 0, 14.
Can't see that getting to 60 pts
0
I normally have teasers set by time.
NOON bracket
3pm bracket
7pm
10 pm
Then I pick the strongest play at that time slot unless there is an 'anchor' team which I think will cover 99.99% of the time then I throw it in all of them.
looking at the slate now for example......two stick out like a sore thumb:
#1) OVER Nebraska
#2) UNDER Central Mich
It takes an act of god for me to take an under in college football. Last two unders I took were under in colts game sunday and last week the under in the BYU game.
Central mich vs Miami (ohio): You have the 119th offense in the country in Ohio and 104th offense in Cent mich. You can tease the 48 to 60.5 in a teaser of 13 pts.
Damn this is turning out to be worse than just a 50/50 gamble on a team bet. Too many chances for 1 team to screw the pooch on this, and adding the 4th team just decreases the odds of winning. May tread this very lightly this week.
for the 3:30 I'm liking:
Min+30.5 / Rice +13/ Clem -2.5
I know I didn't follow some of you rules, but I really think this hits. Rice is my least favorite play in this scenario
0
Damn this is turning out to be worse than just a 50/50 gamble on a team bet. Too many chances for 1 team to screw the pooch on this, and adding the 4th team just decreases the odds of winning. May tread this very lightly this week.
for the 3:30 I'm liking:
Min+30.5 / Rice +13/ Clem -2.5
I know I didn't follow some of you rules, but I really think this hits. Rice is my least favorite play in this scenario
Damn this is turning out to be worse than just a 50/50 gamble on a team bet. Too many chances for 1 team to screw the pooch on this, and adding the 4th team just decreases the odds of winning. May tread this very lightly this week.
for the 3:30 I'm liking:
Min+30.5 / Rice +13/ Clem -2.5
I know I didn't follow some of you rules, but I really think this hits. Rice is my least favorite play in this scenario
This is what that Clemson - Syr game reminds me of.
I remember people were teasing +9.5 lou and thought it was a huge lock.....Bridgewater throws for 400+ yards and they still lose by 3 TDs.
that game scares me is what I am saying.
0
Quote Originally Posted by youngrb69:
Damn this is turning out to be worse than just a 50/50 gamble on a team bet. Too many chances for 1 team to screw the pooch on this, and adding the 4th team just decreases the odds of winning. May tread this very lightly this week.
for the 3:30 I'm liking:
Min+30.5 / Rice +13/ Clem -2.5
I know I didn't follow some of you rules, but I really think this hits. Rice is my least favorite play in this scenario
Young...I like the Stanford and Oklahoma picks. But both Clemson and LSU could be in tough spots. They should cover the teaser spread but feel those are the 2 that could screw you.
BOL
0
Young...I like the Stanford and Oklahoma picks. But both Clemson and LSU could be in tough spots. They should cover the teaser spread but feel those are the 2 that could screw you.
Young...I like the Stanford and Oklahoma picks. But both Clemson and LSU could be in tough spots. They should cover the teaser spread but feel those are the 2 that could screw you.
BOL
Agreed....I also think your strongest play is Oklahoma.
Why?
Stanford lets teams hang around......I can see them winning by 3 late and a push is a loss by .5 pt.
I can't see Oklahoma letting TCU hang around....especially if they play like they did in the 1st half against SMU.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pbt:
Young...I like the Stanford and Oklahoma picks. But both Clemson and LSU could be in tough spots. They should cover the teaser spread but feel those are the 2 that could screw you.
BOL
Agreed....I also think your strongest play is Oklahoma.
Why?
Stanford lets teams hang around......I can see them winning by 3 late and a push is a loss by .5 pt.
I can't see Oklahoma letting TCU hang around....especially if they play like they did in the 1st half against SMU.
Whats up youngb69 first time postin so take this advice for what it is. Especially since ive gotten toasted the last 2 weeks. Although my teasers r the only thing keepin floating. Dont overthink it. Your 1st post had 4 ranked good teams playing inferior opponents and all they have to do is basically win. I would prob drop OK and make it a 3 game teaser. I dont think TCU is dead yet and OK isnt as strong as the other 3 teams you had listed.
0
Whats up youngb69 first time postin so take this advice for what it is. Especially since ive gotten toasted the last 2 weeks. Although my teasers r the only thing keepin floating. Dont overthink it. Your 1st post had 4 ranked good teams playing inferior opponents and all they have to do is basically win. I would prob drop OK and make it a 3 game teaser. I dont think TCU is dead yet and OK isnt as strong as the other 3 teams you had listed.
Illinois is the 91st ranked D in college.......20th passing attack on O.
Nebraska is 105th against the pass and 21st on overall offense rolling up 500+ per contest.
Unlike Illinois Neb hasn't played a REAL cupcake.....Neb hasn't played Miami Ohio or Southern Illinois......so if they have that porous of a Def against those two horrible horrible teams factored in......how many is Neb going to hang on them?
Neb really showed a killer instinct last game. I had Neb and the over in my teasers against S dak state (keep in mind neb had a bye last week).
Neb was TRAILING sdak state 17-14 after one Q. I was livid. I couldn't believe I backed these clowns again and they were letting them just march down the field. S dakota state had almost 500 yards offense in the game......then I saw Neb go to the next level....they played D, got after the QB (Dak had it deep in Neb territory a few times with the game outcome still not determined).
They outscored them 45-3 the rest of the game and ran the ball down their throat to the tune of 650 yards Off.
They will come out like gang busters on saturday.
0
Illinois is the 91st ranked D in college.......20th passing attack on O.
Nebraska is 105th against the pass and 21st on overall offense rolling up 500+ per contest.
Unlike Illinois Neb hasn't played a REAL cupcake.....Neb hasn't played Miami Ohio or Southern Illinois......so if they have that porous of a Def against those two horrible horrible teams factored in......how many is Neb going to hang on them?
Neb really showed a killer instinct last game. I had Neb and the over in my teasers against S dak state (keep in mind neb had a bye last week).
Neb was TRAILING sdak state 17-14 after one Q. I was livid. I couldn't believe I backed these clowns again and they were letting them just march down the field. S dakota state had almost 500 yards offense in the game......then I saw Neb go to the next level....they played D, got after the QB (Dak had it deep in Neb territory a few times with the game outcome still not determined).
They outscored them 45-3 the rest of the game and ran the ball down their throat to the tune of 650 yards Off.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.