Bowls
hate your on sparty
hate your on sparty
What do you think about North Texas?
What do you think about North Texas?
Any thoughts on Huskers/Dawgs AMD? BOL today.
Any thoughts on Huskers/Dawgs AMD? BOL today.
no arkansas state today? lmao
no arkansas state today? lmao
I watched mich states game vs minn. mich st 1 and 3 tech are garbage. they don't cross face and get to the ball and don't dominate and create a new line of scrimmage off the ball. I like their defensive philosophy of wrong shouldering the kickout and getting the linebacker over the top to take the spill, but Stanford is going to base the end and lead up with the backside og. and mich st is without bullough in the middle.
Stanford's qb is terrible but I think they run the ball effectively on mich st.
Stanford has faced 7 of the top 36 offenses holding them to an avg of 18 points while mich st has faced 3 of the top 36 holding them to an avg of 19 points. and mind you, one of those 3 was mich which padded their stats vs the likes of Indiana and c mich.
yes, Michigan states offense is much different than the spread offenses Stanford saw in the pac 12. but that's the thing... Stanford has speed deficiencies in the front 7 you would think a spread offense can take advantage of and they couldn't. now they match up versus an offense more suited to their strengths on defense.
I teased Stanford. hopefully we both win. not saying you're wrong, but just trying to generate some discussion. good luck
I watched mich states game vs minn. mich st 1 and 3 tech are garbage. they don't cross face and get to the ball and don't dominate and create a new line of scrimmage off the ball. I like their defensive philosophy of wrong shouldering the kickout and getting the linebacker over the top to take the spill, but Stanford is going to base the end and lead up with the backside og. and mich st is without bullough in the middle.
Stanford's qb is terrible but I think they run the ball effectively on mich st.
Stanford has faced 7 of the top 36 offenses holding them to an avg of 18 points while mich st has faced 3 of the top 36 holding them to an avg of 19 points. and mind you, one of those 3 was mich which padded their stats vs the likes of Indiana and c mich.
yes, Michigan states offense is much different than the spread offenses Stanford saw in the pac 12. but that's the thing... Stanford has speed deficiencies in the front 7 you would think a spread offense can take advantage of and they couldn't. now they match up versus an offense more suited to their strengths on defense.
I teased Stanford. hopefully we both win. not saying you're wrong, but just trying to generate some discussion. good luck
I watched mich states game vs minn. mich st 1 and 3 tech are garbage. they don't cross face and get to the ball and don't dominate and create a new line of scrimmage off the ball. I like their defensive philosophy of wrong shouldering the kickout and getting the linebacker over the top to take the spill, but Stanford is going to base the end and lead up with the backside og. and mich st is without bullough in the middle.
Stanford's qb is terrible but I think they run the ball effectively on mich st.
Stanford has faced 7 of the top 36 offenses holding them to an avg of 18 points while mich st has faced 3 of the top 36 holding them to an avg of 19 points. and mind you, one of those 3 was mich which padded their stats vs the likes of Indiana and c mich.
yes, Michigan states offense is much different than the spread offenses Stanford saw in the pac 12. but that's the thing... Stanford has speed deficiencies in the front 7 you would think a spread offense can take advantage of and they couldn't. now they match up versus an offense more suited to their strengths on defense.
I teased Stanford. hopefully we both win. not saying you're wrong, but just trying to generate some discussion. good luck
I watched mich states game vs minn. mich st 1 and 3 tech are garbage. they don't cross face and get to the ball and don't dominate and create a new line of scrimmage off the ball. I like their defensive philosophy of wrong shouldering the kickout and getting the linebacker over the top to take the spill, but Stanford is going to base the end and lead up with the backside og. and mich st is without bullough in the middle.
Stanford's qb is terrible but I think they run the ball effectively on mich st.
Stanford has faced 7 of the top 36 offenses holding them to an avg of 18 points while mich st has faced 3 of the top 36 holding them to an avg of 19 points. and mind you, one of those 3 was mich which padded their stats vs the likes of Indiana and c mich.
yes, Michigan states offense is much different than the spread offenses Stanford saw in the pac 12. but that's the thing... Stanford has speed deficiencies in the front 7 you would think a spread offense can take advantage of and they couldn't. now they match up versus an offense more suited to their strengths on defense.
I teased Stanford. hopefully we both win. not saying you're wrong, but just trying to generate some discussion. good luck
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,393
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
259,623
-
Sunday 09/20/2026
576
-
PART DEUX
180
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,716
-
Flawed Logic: and Bad Decisions: NFL Edition
4,229
-
Dogs biting today?
3,958
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,308
-
_📌 😎 Fubah's bets for NFL 2026: Week 02 🚩🚩
10,560
-
Philadelphia Eagles @ Tennessee Titans
5,444
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
