All Forums | College Football

Bowls

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 101960
Posts: 350
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #151
may need 52 from zona
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 3965
Posted: #152
Went for it on 4th down instead of kicking the damn fg!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 229
Posted: #153
So let me get this straight go for it on 4th from the 12 and the wanker slides a foot short? Kick the damn fg!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #154
hope that little girl got paid well
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 229
Posted: #155
Nice!!! Sweating it for a bit! AZ qb is still a d-bag!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #156


never in doubt lol.  nice hit
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #157
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2852
Posted: #158
Whats up bro?
Went 3-1 yesterday
GT loss......should have known
went balls deep with TexTch
made back 60% of my Eagles loss

took. Ari and UCLA, and UCLA U45 today
Miss St
Texas AnM
TTYS


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2326
Posted: #159
nice day
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #160
[Quote: Originally Posted by amd] 


 Utah State pk  

Marshall ml -135 

Syracuse +4 

BYU +4 

Rutgers +14 

Miami +6 

Kansas State +5.5 

Navy -6 

Georgia Tech +3 

Arizona/BC over 57 

UCLA -7.5. 

Texas A&M -12.5. 


Michigan State +7  Big

LSU -7.5

South Carolina +1.5




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 4110
Posted: #161
What do you think about North Texas?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #162
hate your on sparty
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #163
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:

hate your on sparty

And, Im not crazy about you being on Stanford but Sparty is no longer a one dimensional offense and they have the big boys to compete in the trench. I honestly believe Sparty wins.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #164
Quote Originally Posted by bet-lag:

What do you think about North Texas?

I like N Texas but I would be more inclined to play the over because I think UNLV can move the ball today. I have my money tied up in the other three games so Im laying off...bol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1158
Posted: #165
With you on scar and sparty...good luck amd

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 4525
Posted: #166
stanford in the rose bowl...spartans missing key defensive player..this kid gaffney damnnn...filling out a 10 pointer here on opposite side...may we both win
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #167
Any thoughts on Huskers/Dawgs AMD? BOL today.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 877
Posted: #168
no arkansas state today? lmao
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #169
Quote Originally Posted by gatorbear:

Any thoughts on Huskers/Dawgs AMD? BOL today.




Nebraska is a dead team with a dead coaching staff so I dont  want any part of them. Sure, they might score a few points on Georgias defense but I wouldnt be surprised if Georgia covered today.Nebraska fukking blows. Goergia or over but Im not wagering 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #170
Quote Originally Posted by intel-1:

no arkansas state today? lmao

Im Quite sure that your dumb asss isnt  betting with real money. You were broke long ago, cockroach. Move along.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 12069
Posted: #171
good luck today bud. LSU and SPARTY. i'm with ya
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 5526
Posted: #172
Let's roll with your pick ,bro. Happy new year.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1534
Posted: #173

I watched mich states game vs minn.   mich st 1 and 3 tech are garbage.   they don't cross face and get to the ball and don't dominate and create a new line of scrimmage off the ball.   I like their defensive philosophy of wrong shouldering the kickout and getting the linebacker over the top to take the spill, but Stanford is going to base the end and lead up with the backside og.   and mich st is without bullough in the middle.

Stanford's qb is terrible but I think they run the ball effectively on mich st.

Stanford has faced 7 of the top 36 offenses holding them to an avg of 18 points while mich st has faced 3 of the top 36 holding them to an avg of 19 points.   and mind you, one of those 3 was mich which padded their stats vs the likes of Indiana and c mich.

yes, Michigan states offense is much different than the spread offenses Stanford saw in the pac 12.   but that's the thing... Stanford has speed deficiencies in the front 7 you would think a spread offense can take advantage of and they couldn't.   now they match up versus an offense more suited to their strengths on defense.

I teased Stanford.   hopefully we both win.   not saying you're wrong, but just trying to generate some discussion.   good luck

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #174
Quote Originally Posted by HighScore:

I watched mich states game vs minn.   mich st 1 and 3 tech are garbage.   they don't cross face and get to the ball and don't dominate and create a new line of scrimmage off the ball.   I like their defensive philosophy of wrong shouldering the kickout and getting the linebacker over the top to take the spill, but Stanford is going to base the end and lead up with the backside og.   and mich st is without bullough in the middle.

Stanford's qb is terrible but I think they run the ball effectively on mich st.

Stanford has faced 7 of the top 36 offenses holding them to an avg of 18 points while mich st has faced 3 of the top 36 holding them to an avg of 19 points.   and mind you, one of those 3 was mich which padded their stats vs the likes of Indiana and c mich.

yes, Michigan states offense is much different than the spread offenses Stanford saw in the pac 12.   but that's the thing... Stanford has speed deficiencies in the front 7 you would think a spread offense can take advantage of and they couldn't.   now they match up versus an offense more suited to their strengths on defense.

I teased Stanford.   hopefully we both win.   not saying you're wrong, but just trying to generate some discussion.   good luck


unfortunately I only understood half of your discussion, I guess I'm not too bright but I welcome you and anyone else that wants to talk X's n O's into my thread....it beats the hell out of talking about teams based solely on line plays. I give you my breakdown of the game in a minute
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 51182
Posted: #175
GL today Bud
Happy New Year!!!
R.I.P. Legend
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.