Kansas +2.5
Syracuse +10
Wyoming +1.5
Clemson -5.5
Tulane +2
Purdue +14.5 top play
Penn St. +2.5
ADD Washington +3
Duke -3
Kansas +2.5
Syracuse +10
Wash +3
Wyoming +1.5
Clemson -5.5
Tulane +2
Purdue +14.5 top play
Penn St. +2.5
ADD Washington +3
Duke -3
Kansas +2.5
Syracuse +10
Wash +3
Wyoming +1.5
Clemson -5.5
Tulane +2
Purdue +14.5 top play
Penn St. +2.5
@spottie2935
Just to clarify, is Clemson -5.5 your play even though the SDQL link you provided shows UW+3, Tennessee +6, and Penn State +2 as the selections in this years bowl games?
Thank you in advance for your response.
Your picks are 4-0 thus far, and the remaining 5 selections look razor sharp.
AS
@spottie2935
Just to clarify, is Clemson -5.5 your play even though the SDQL link you provided shows UW+3, Tennessee +6, and Penn State +2 as the selections in this years bowl games?
Thank you in advance for your response.
Your picks are 4-0 thus far, and the remaining 5 selections look razor sharp.
AS
Washington was in this negative query as well
good catch this Clemson play overlaps with another Strong SDQL's against Tennessee.
In the case of Tennessee they hit a few negative queries. That swings me on the Clemson side.
Washington was in this negative query as well
good catch this Clemson play overlaps with another Strong SDQL's against Tennessee.
In the case of Tennessee they hit a few negative queries. That swings me on the Clemson side.
I know it looks bad as Purdue has some roster issues key players not playing but I have a strong query with them. I could filter this play out of my list but I am sticking with them. Other and lot of others bowl teams have suffered the sit outs and have overcome the adverse conditions. We will see if this is the case here.
I know it looks bad as Purdue has some roster issues key players not playing but I have a strong query with them. I could filter this play out of my list but I am sticking with them. Other and lot of others bowl teams have suffered the sit outs and have overcome the adverse conditions. We will see if this is the case here.
These dogs are terrible ATS and 2ndly re only 4-20 Straight up.
The other query was against unranked and a Texas team with a 3rd string RB.
In Clemson we have a top 10 ranked proven team playing against Tennessee's non starting QB. What has Tennessee done in big bowls? They were a great regular season team but the query shows they are a huge underdog to win this game, that leaves 5 points to win and 6 for a push. Clemson to has QB issues as Ukalele* (sp, lol) is out as well but make no mistake the Clemson defense can win here.
play as you like do your own work but I like these.
These dogs are terrible ATS and 2ndly re only 4-20 Straight up.
The other query was against unranked and a Texas team with a 3rd string RB.
In Clemson we have a top 10 ranked proven team playing against Tennessee's non starting QB. What has Tennessee done in big bowls? They were a great regular season team but the query shows they are a huge underdog to win this game, that leaves 5 points to win and 6 for a push. Clemson to has QB issues as Ukalele* (sp, lol) is out as well but make no mistake the Clemson defense can win here.
play as you like do your own work but I like these.
I dont have time. I did a lot of this myself. there are a few cappers that are successful but youre going to have to keep your eyes open on this site for them
Check my threads next season. Its better to ask when i have a day in between games. In the mean time read over the site in the off season. Prove to me you are willing to learn.
I dont have time. I did a lot of this myself. there are a few cappers that are successful but youre going to have to keep your eyes open on this site for them
Check my threads next season. Its better to ask when i have a day in between games. In the mean time read over the site in the off season. Prove to me you are willing to learn.
The Minnesota game was lucky but part of the luck was knowing that Minnesota has never layed that many in a bowl game ever!
Also PJ Flecks biggest Bowl game coming from WMU. Minnesota's problem in the past is they never got too many of the top athletes. Its still a big problem fo them but they are doing better. I looked at the line and their hisory and my though was this was going to very difficult to climb past -10. They did it but a few ba calls against them and they left the backdoor open, because -10 it was difficult to get 2 scores past -10. Thats what happened.
The Minnesota game was lucky but part of the luck was knowing that Minnesota has never layed that many in a bowl game ever!
Also PJ Flecks biggest Bowl game coming from WMU. Minnesota's problem in the past is they never got too many of the top athletes. Its still a big problem fo them but they are doing better. I looked at the line and their hisory and my though was this was going to very difficult to climb past -10. They did it but a few ba calls against them and they left the backdoor open, because -10 it was difficult to get 2 scores past -10. Thats what happened.
LSU lines this season (omiting the New Mexico game and Southern University game):
-4
+3
-8
+3
+1.5
+1
+14
-5
-15
-10
+17
Only 3 times on the season they layed less than -7 points. They have an elite QB but thus far on the season LSU offense is mostly about power and speed from the run game.
Purdue hung with Michigan is the Conference championship for a half. They only scored 13 points and were down only 1 point at half time against Michigan! It wasnt the offense that did this on their own it was a team game. Michigan also scored a last minute TD to cover that spread.
I admit I am a bit in the Dark about Purdues starting QB. He could sure toss the game away, but in most cases I trust my data and SDQL. I also trust the fact that LSU was no pwerhouse this season and laying -14 points is never good in bowls. The books know this.
56% winners over all taking +10 in any bowl game here>>>
this is where I am at on Purdue :
The concern is how many does Purdue score to keep it close. In my from the data and my opinion anything 15+ or more gets the cash. If they dont get 15 + good chance I lose.
LSU lines this season (omiting the New Mexico game and Southern University game):
-4
+3
-8
+3
+1.5
+1
+14
-5
-15
-10
+17
Only 3 times on the season they layed less than -7 points. They have an elite QB but thus far on the season LSU offense is mostly about power and speed from the run game.
Purdue hung with Michigan is the Conference championship for a half. They only scored 13 points and were down only 1 point at half time against Michigan! It wasnt the offense that did this on their own it was a team game. Michigan also scored a last minute TD to cover that spread.
I admit I am a bit in the Dark about Purdues starting QB. He could sure toss the game away, but in most cases I trust my data and SDQL. I also trust the fact that LSU was no pwerhouse this season and laying -14 points is never good in bowls. The books know this.
56% winners over all taking +10 in any bowl game here>>>
this is where I am at on Purdue :
The concern is how many does Purdue score to keep it close. In my from the data and my opinion anything 15+ or more gets the cash. If they dont get 15 + good chance I lose.
LSU lines this season (omiting the New Mexico game and Southern University game):
-4
+3
-8
+3
+1.5
+1
+14
-5
-15
-10
+17
I posted these and if this matters to you go look over who they played this season
In these 11 games their average line was +.7 points. Getting points: AVERAGE
They played Georgia in the Championship Game.
Georgia's schedule:
-16
-53 samford omit
-25
-44 Kent State omit
-31
-27
-37
-23
-10
-16
-22
-36
-17
Georgia's average line (omitting the big big lines): -23
LSU lines this season (omiting the New Mexico game and Southern University game):
-4
+3
-8
+3
+1.5
+1
+14
-5
-15
-10
+17
I posted these and if this matters to you go look over who they played this season
In these 11 games their average line was +.7 points. Getting points: AVERAGE
They played Georgia in the Championship Game.
Georgia's schedule:
-16
-53 samford omit
-25
-44 Kent State omit
-31
-27
-37
-23
-10
-16
-22
-36
-17
Georgia's average line (omitting the big big lines): -23
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.