All Forums | College Football

Can Oregon Stop Cam Newton In The Championship?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19533
Posts: 305
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #201
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:



You can't "make money off morons like you" in the United States; an affiliate is 15 years in jail in Oregon, and I'm sure Florida law isn't much different.

The bookmaker is the illegal party in online gambling, and if you choose to take make money with them, you are jointly liable.

An affiliate is the same as owning the book in United States law.


This place is like a drug habit, can't leave so long as morons like you and that other jack-off that has to be your girl friend, blueballs, black cow, whoever that is, is around are around. Where else can you find a moron that says the things you do in what I high lighted about affilites. Sarah, you can get expelleed from the 8TH grade for being on gambling forums in the school computer lab, you better be careful...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #202
Being an affiliate is not illegal. You cannot get into trouble for promoting, only owning. You are indeed a moron...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #203
So Oregon supporters basic argument is that Auburn is going to get winded in the 4th quarter by Oregon's frantic and crazy speed....

what if the game is well out of reach by the 4th?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #204
Quote Originally Posted by brownbull:




I've read all the posts by you & Sarah up to now.  First, Sarah is clearly not clueless.  Second, you have already made at least a few comments that exposed you.  I'm not going to write a book here but I don't believe for a second that "supplement" you income from this. Neither do any of the knowledgable people on here if they read what enough of your posts.  You pat yourself on the back for your Ohio St & Stanford teaser.  You tease college games like that?  Very impressive.  lol


How are your picks going here this year? Oh wait..I'm sorry, I did not realize you are here to simply talk and not make picks...Make some winning picks then you can criticize people who make money.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #205
Quote Originally Posted by nbafan88:

So Oregon supporters basic argument is that Auburn is going to get winded in the 4th quarter by Oregon's frantic and crazy speed....

what if the game is well out of reach by the 4th?


It will be...Auburn's line's (both sides will control the game). The final will most likely be well over double digits. I originally thought 45-31, but the more I see the more I realize that Oregon will not be able to handle the physical pounding they will endure...Auburn wins something like 52-24...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #206
It's kind of funny how Droxside claimed to be "signing off", but has no life and needed to comeback.

Oh man, oh well. Welcome back, friend. We are all here for you.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1
Posted: #207
Cam Newton is simply just to much for Oregon.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1450
Posted: #208

Quote Originally Posted by nbafan88:

So Oregon supporters basic argument is that Auburn is going to get winded in the 4th quarter by Oregon's frantic and crazy speed....

what if the game is well out of reach by the 4th?

well out of reach for oregon

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1450
Posted: #209

Quote Originally Posted by jcovington:

Cam Newton is simply just to much for Oregon.

 

WELL PUT!!!

GREAT FIRST COMMENT!! you have a bright future on covers!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #210
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:

It's kind of funny how Droxside claimed to be "signing off", but has no life and needed to comeback.

Oh man, oh well. Welcome back, friend. We are all here for you.




Thanks Sarah, I appreciate it. Like I said, your like a bad drug that is hard to shake, you need to be dealt with along with your girlfriend that you had post earlier in the day. Thanks for being here for me it means a lot, you are a true friend, a little off, but true...Best Of Luck..P.S. Like I said, the more I look at the two teams, the more I suspect Auburn will be just too physical for Oregon. I have no doubt the Ducks will break a few long one's, but they will not be able to sustain long drives against a powerful front seven that will dominate the line of scrimmage and reek havoc on the Ducks continuity. On the other side it will be a total mis-match. Newton will run for 150-200 yards and Dyer will add on late...Auburn 52-24 I think...Sarah, I will be posting my plays soon, will you do the same so we can compare after the fact?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #211
Quote Originally Posted by pirates11:

 

WELL PUT!!!

GREAT FIRST COMMENT!! you have a bright future on covers!

(_!_)  = normal ass

(_?_) = dumb ass = pirates11

Listen, (_?_), only you would try turn around a discussion into a rah-rah session, and only a (_?_) like yourself would compliment someone on a fragmented sentence:"Cam Newton is simply just to much for Oregon." You see, it should be "too" not "to." Is Cam too much of what for Oregon? Also, your wager is SQUARE. It is square because you are taking the Heisman Trophy winner and a team from a conference that has won four straight titles and they are favored. Why do you think your wager is based on some kind of priveleged information, or you have the naughty boyz who get no respect? They're favored (_?_)

 You will not even make 1000 posts before you realize your input is worthless piffle (look it up), and you will wind up posting your opinions on yahoo where noone will read them.

I am through commenting on your piffle, since it brings you unwarranted attention.

Bye, bye (_?_)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #212
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:



It will be...Auburn's line's (both sides will control the game). The final will most likely be well over double digits. I originally thought 45-31, but the more I see the more I realize that Oregon will not be able to handle the physical pounding they will endure...Auburn wins something like 52-24...



Drox... you have no idea what you are doing here, do you?  as a general rule, i do my talking before games, and not after them... but i think i'm going to have to make an exception for this game...

Oregon hasn't given up more than 31 to anybody this year... playing in a conference that has much better offenses than Auburn... meanwhile, against the only respectable defenses Auburn faced this year (Miss St, LSU, Alabama, Clemson)... they couldn't break 28 points...

how the fuck are they going to score 52 on Oregon?  by magic?

it's not going to happen... Auburn is looking at maybe 35 points... and i see now way that they hold Oregon under 38... best case scenario, Auburn wins a close game... worst case, they get rolled by 2 TDs or more...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #213
Not to pick a fight with you Apoc, but numbers can be read any way you want.  Cal was the only decent defense Oregon faced, ranked at 22, and only managed 15 points.  You can blame that on the "injury" gameplan if you like, but you should know better than that.  Auburn faced number 6 and 9, plus other highly ranked defenses, and produced much better numbers in comparison.  I'll grant yo that this Oregon team is not last year's team, but this is the same type type of match-up as last year, where they'll be facing a significant size and strength disadvantage.  It'll be interesting.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #214
Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:




Drox... you have no idea what you are doing here, do you?  as a general rule, i do my talking before games, and not after them... but i think i'm going to have to make an exception for this game...

Oregon hasn't given up more than 31 to anybody this year... playing in a conference that has much better offenses than Auburn... meanwhile, against the only respectable defenses Auburn faced this year (Miss St, LSU, Alabama, Clemson)... they couldn't break 28 points...

how the fuck are they going to score 52 on Oregon?  by magic?

it's not going to happen... Auburn is looking at maybe 35 points... and i see now way that they hold Oregon under 38... best case scenario, Auburn wins a close game... worst case, they get rolled by 2 TDs or more...


I appreciate your opinion, just disagree. av8rg8r put it better then I probably can but will say that Auburn is going to dominate Oregon when on offense for the simple fact that Oregon will not be able to stop Auburn physical, power running with Newton and Dyer. I really expect Auburn to control both lines of scrimmage and Oregon to possible get discouraged later in the game once they realize they cannot stop Newton on the ground, much less the air. Auburn's physical defensive front 7 along with enough speed to keep up will cause problems for the Ducks continuity. They will score some points, but not be able to keep up.

One very important point is that I do not believe Oregon will have very many sustained drives due to what I have already said and the notion that Fairly and the others will be sucking wind will not happen, at leat no more then normal. If anything, the 11 defensive players for Oregon who get stuck on the field late in the 3rd or early 4th quarter after Auburn runs to it's sideline (to keep the ball over there) on 1st down from it's own 20 and runs about 10-14 plays on a drive will officially be spent and exhausted after chasing Newton all night.

I respect what Oregon has done and in fact rode them along with Auburn on several winning small parlays and teasers when others thought the road or what not would get them, but they have little chance in even slowing Auburn down with Newton running the offense and just will not be able to keep up....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by av8rg8r:

Not to pick a fight with you Apoc, but numbers can be read any way you want.  Cal was the only decent defense Oregon faced, ranked at 22, and only managed 15 points.  You can blame that on the "injury" gameplan if you like, but you should know better than that.  Auburn faced number 6 and 9, plus other highly ranked defenses, and produced much better numbers in comparison.  I'll grant yo that this Oregon team is not last year's team, but this is the same type type of match-up as last year, where they'll be facing a significant size and strength disadvantage.  It'll be interesting.


i'm not going that much on numbers... i just think when you look into the two teams game by game there is no big edge that every one is claiming for Auburn... it isn't there...

i think everyone is getting overly excited about Auburn... we'll see... pretty sure i will be on Oregon... just hoping that all the Auburn love pushes the line up another 1/2 point...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2
Posted: #216
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:

It's not just our SPEED that is deadly, it's our TEMPO which is UNMATCHED.

Don't kid yourselves on the TEMPO. NO ONE, including Auburn, snaps the ball faster that Oregon play to play. NO ONE comes even close.





I know this has nothing to do with the thread, but Michigan actually has the fastest no huddle offense. Not even trying to say they are on the same level as Oregon or Auburn. Just FYI :)
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #217
Michigan has the fastest snap to snap no huddle offense?

You are an imbecile.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #218
one thing that will help Auburn is the fact that Malzahn is staying after rumors he would leave... that will definitely give them a boost and be a rallying cry for them... not sure that is enough, but it helps...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #219
Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:



i'm not going that much on numbers... i just think when you look into the two teams game by game there is no big edge that every one is claiming for Auburn... it isn't there...

i think everyone is getting overly excited about Auburn... we'll see... pretty sure i will be on Oregon... just hoping that all the Auburn love pushes the line up another 1/2 point...


Fair enough. I do think the number will go up a little if anything so waiting makes sense...Best of luck...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2
Posted: #220
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:

Michigan has the fastest snap to snap no huddle offense?

You are an imbecile.


Ouch? That was a bit harsh! No need for the hostility!

Did you get a chance to watch any Michigan games this year? Obviously their offense isn't half what Oregon's is overall, but their snap to snap time is actually the fastest. Unless the little chart they put up on ESPN during the Penn State game was garbage. Not saying everything ESPN uses is 100% accurate, but I doubt it was complete nonsense either. I don't remember exact numbers, but it showed the percentage of plays snapped with 25+ seconds left, 20+ seconds left, and so on. Might have been one of ESPN's BS stats we see everyday, just thought it was worth noting.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 83
Posted: #221
I don't post often, and am on the other side, but my hat's off to Sarah for a most entertaining (and evidently provocative) thread.I don't claim to be a high profile capper; still, I'd like to stick my toe in the water on this one.  I think the clock will roll a little more than most in this game, primarily from nerves, and from both teams being thrown off their game a bit. As a result, I like the under (around 68), and I like Auburn by 6 to 8 (sorry, Sarah).  While speed of play can wear down an opponent, so can size and strength, and after my study that's way i see it.  Just the same, good luck to all, and thanks again for your thread, Sarah.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #222
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:

Michigan has the fastest snap to snap no huddle offense?

You are an imbecile.



that is no way for a so called lady to act!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #223
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:




that is no way for a so called lady to act!


Please explain to me how I should act. I'd love to hear this.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #224
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:



Please explain to me how I should act. I'd love to hear this.





get on your knees and open your mouth
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #225
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:




get on your knees and open your mouth


I'm not your mother. Please only use these remarks towards her moving forward.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.