First locked in play:
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
One thing Sherman can do is beat up on the lesser teams. The times where he gets into trouble is when he goes up against teams that can match him from a talent perspective and he actually needs to coach and make in-game adjustments (see Arkansas for an example). Anyways, Iowa State (especially with out Shontrell Johnson) is one of those lesser teams. I don't care that this is a road game, I expect the Aggies to control the game on the offensive side scoring at will and also finally having a decent defensive game now that they aren't playing one of the top offenses. I see a score around 51-21.
First locked in play:
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
One thing Sherman can do is beat up on the lesser teams. The times where he gets into trouble is when he goes up against teams that can match him from a talent perspective and he actually needs to coach and make in-game adjustments (see Arkansas for an example). Anyways, Iowa State (especially with out Shontrell Johnson) is one of those lesser teams. I don't care that this is a road game, I expect the Aggies to control the game on the offensive side scoring at will and also finally having a decent defensive game now that they aren't playing one of the top offenses. I see a score around 51-21.
First off, I am still somewhat pissed about that UCLA/Zona over. How that did not hit is beyond me. Moving on.
Next locked in play:
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
This year I am 4-1 on my 3 unit plays. I don't go with them too often, but when I do I seem to be successful. In this case, I am just not a big fan of Cincy, but I am a huge fan of Skip Holtz. I just feel like South Florida has the edge in coaching and the edge offensively. Add-in that this is a home game, and I think they take care of business in this one. I think you would be safe playing the -3, but since I went 3 units (which is a big play for me), I decide to get rid of any points and just play them straight up to win.
First off, I am still somewhat pissed about that UCLA/Zona over. How that did not hit is beyond me. Moving on.
Next locked in play:
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
This year I am 4-1 on my 3 unit plays. I don't go with them too often, but when I do I seem to be successful. In this case, I am just not a big fan of Cincy, but I am a huge fan of Skip Holtz. I just feel like South Florida has the edge in coaching and the edge offensively. Add-in that this is a home game, and I think they take care of business in this one. I think you would be safe playing the -3, but since I went 3 units (which is a big play for me), I decide to get rid of any points and just play them straight up to win.
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Wow, really surprised that over didn't hit last night. I was actually gonna be on it, but got busy at work and didn't get a chance to jump on it. Pathetic offense from the Bruins last night, 12pts are you kidding me.
Sry bro, bol with the rest of the card. Hope you do well, cause our cards are very similar & I'm leaning towards KSU at -11 also.
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Wow, really surprised that over didn't hit last night. I was actually gonna be on it, but got busy at work and didn't get a chance to jump on it. Pathetic offense from the Bruins last night, 12pts are you kidding me.
Sry bro, bol with the rest of the card. Hope you do well, cause our cards are very similar & I'm leaning towards KSU at -11 also.
Wow, really surprised that over didn't hit last night. I was actually gonna be on it, but got busy at work and didn't get a chance to jump on it. Pathetic offense from the Bruins last night, 12pts are you kidding me.
Sry bro, bol with the rest of the card. Hope you do well, cause our cards are very similar & I'm leaning towards KSU at -11 also.
Yeah, it is what it is I guess on that over. Not sure if you watched it, but the main reason I was pissed was because UCLA literally was inches from scoring a TD in the 4th quarter. In fact, both James and Palmer thought he got in when they went to the booth for review. The officials didn't agree and UCLA turned it over on downs.
Wow, really surprised that over didn't hit last night. I was actually gonna be on it, but got busy at work and didn't get a chance to jump on it. Pathetic offense from the Bruins last night, 12pts are you kidding me.
Sry bro, bol with the rest of the card. Hope you do well, cause our cards are very similar & I'm leaning towards KSU at -11 also.
Yeah, it is what it is I guess on that over. Not sure if you watched it, but the main reason I was pissed was because UCLA literally was inches from scoring a TD in the 4th quarter. In fact, both James and Palmer thought he got in when they went to the booth for review. The officials didn't agree and UCLA turned it over on downs.
Yeah, it is what it is I guess on that over. Not sure if you watched it, but the main reason I was pissed was because UCLA literally was inches from scoring a TD in the 4th quarter. In fact, both James and Palmer thought he got in when they went to the booth for review. The officials didn't agree and UCLA turned it over on downs.
Nope, didn't see that. Unbelievable!
Win some you loose some, but the over was the right side. Just means your due for the rest of the week.
Yeah, it is what it is I guess on that over. Not sure if you watched it, but the main reason I was pissed was because UCLA literally was inches from scoring a TD in the 4th quarter. In fact, both James and Palmer thought he got in when they went to the booth for review. The officials didn't agree and UCLA turned it over on downs.
Nope, didn't see that. Unbelievable!
Win some you loose some, but the over was the right side. Just means your due for the rest of the week.
Adding:
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
I was waiting for the line to get to 42 and glad it did. Two really good defenses and mediocre offenses.
Adding:
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
I was waiting for the line to get to 42 and glad it did. Two really good defenses and mediocre offenses.
Adding:
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
I suspect all of these teams win by double digits. I am not a huge fan of this much juice, but I think each of these teams wins 9 out of 10 times in each of these games. So, if my assumption is correct, then I expect this play to hit about 70% of the time. We'll see what happens.
Adding:
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
I suspect all of these teams win by double digits. I am not a huge fan of this much juice, but I think each of these teams wins 9 out of 10 times in each of these games. So, if my assumption is correct, then I expect this play to hit about 70% of the time. We'll see what happens.
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
Final play for this weekend:
Washington +21 -120 (1 unit)
I realize Washington has flown under the radar a bit this season, but 21 is way too many points in my opinion to be giving to a team that is likely to win 9 games this season. Stanford will win this game and Andrew Luck will no doubt play well. But, I have a feeling the game will be in doubt into the 4th quarter. I look for Stanford to win this one by 10-14 points.
Final play for this weekend:
Washington +21 -120 (1 unit)
I realize Washington has flown under the radar a bit this season, but 21 is way too many points in my opinion to be giving to a team that is likely to win 9 games this season. Stanford will win this game and Andrew Luck will no doubt play well. But, I have a feeling the game will be in doubt into the 4th quarter. I look for Stanford to win this one by 10-14 points.
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
Washington +21 -120 (1 unit)
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
Washington +21 -120 (1 unit)
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
Washington +21 -120 (1 unit)
UCLA/Zona o61 -118 (1 unit)
Rutgers/Lville u42 -118 (1 unit)
Kansas State -11 -110 (1 unit)
South Florida ML -150 (3 units)
Wake Forest -3 -115 (1 unit)
Georgia Tech +3 -120 (2 units)
Texas A&M -20 -120 (2 units)
TAMU/ISU u67 -120 (2 units)
Temple/Arky/Vandy ML -150 (2 units)
Washington +21 -120 (1 unit)
Aggie:
Excellent reasoning on GT and KSt-allows you to accept a loss because you thought it out and know most of the time, the play will work. Fundamentals...and by the way, OU should have beaten KU by 50 but then Stoops is unreliable as usual-I would lay whatever the odds are on Wisc, Ala and LSU against that guy right now...but they won't make it that far...
Aggie:
Excellent reasoning on GT and KSt-allows you to accept a loss because you thought it out and know most of the time, the play will work. Fundamentals...and by the way, OU should have beaten KU by 50 but then Stoops is unreliable as usual-I would lay whatever the odds are on Wisc, Ala and LSU against that guy right now...but they won't make it that far...
Aggie:
Excellent reasoning on GT and KSt-allows you to accept a loss because you thought it out and know most of the time, the play will work. Fundamentals...and by the way, OU should have beaten KU by 50 but then Stoops is unreliable as usual-I would lay whatever the odds are on Wisc, Ala and LSU against that guy right now...but they won't make it that far...
K-State looks to have their game wrapped up. You know, it should be interesting as it relates to OU. I am hoping my boys can knock them out (although I doubt that will be the case). But, I do have a feeling I will be on OSU when those two play the last game of the season. I also agree that one of the top two SEC teams would beat OU relatively easily.
Aggie:
Excellent reasoning on GT and KSt-allows you to accept a loss because you thought it out and know most of the time, the play will work. Fundamentals...and by the way, OU should have beaten KU by 50 but then Stoops is unreliable as usual-I would lay whatever the odds are on Wisc, Ala and LSU against that guy right now...but they won't make it that far...
K-State looks to have their game wrapped up. You know, it should be interesting as it relates to OU. I am hoping my boys can knock them out (although I doubt that will be the case). But, I do have a feeling I will be on OSU when those two play the last game of the season. I also agree that one of the top two SEC teams would beat OU relatively easily.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.