xfactor is actually a good talent searching show and they allow a wide range of people to compete.. not like in american idol where the participant's age has to be from 15-25 or something. so yea dont judge until you watch it
and to answer your question.. no i dont watch dancing with the stars.
0
Quote Originally Posted by trying2makeabuk:
xfactor is actually a good talent searching show and they allow a wide range of people to compete.. not like in american idol where the participant's age has to be from 15-25 or something. so yea dont judge until you watch it
and to answer your question.. no i dont watch dancing with the stars.
I can never back a team where I know the Qb is pure shit. I never backed for example Garcia and will never back a guy named Maynard. Guy couldnt even cover 24 in Oregon after having the lead at halftime, what makes people think he can cover a short line of -3
you didnt because you didnt bet it, and if it were always this easy everyone would be rich sometimes the gay square play wins, doesnt help that theyve managed 4 turnovers in one half but 5 all year, flukes are flukes
0
Quote Originally Posted by LawsonJames:
I can never back a team where I know the Qb is pure shit. I never backed for example Garcia and will never back a guy named Maynard. Guy couldnt even cover 24 in Oregon after having the lead at halftime, what makes people think he can cover a short line of -3
you didnt because you didnt bet it, and if it were always this easy everyone would be rich sometimes the gay square play wins, doesnt help that theyve managed 4 turnovers in one half but 5 all year, flukes are flukes
If you bet USC like me, you MUST bet Cal pk (or whatever) to take the middle. MUST!!! 15/16 point middle. THINK like a sharp!
Sharps know the difference between a team that has underperformed & those that are just shit...........Cal fits into the latter catagory............sharps will take their winnings & go to bed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hdoug1222:
If you bet USC like me, you MUST bet Cal pk (or whatever) to take the middle. MUST!!! 15/16 point middle. THINK like a sharp!
Sharps know the difference between a team that has underperformed & those that are just shit...........Cal fits into the latter catagory............sharps will take their winnings & go to bed.
you didnt because you didnt bet it, and if it were always this easy everyone would be rich sometimes the gay square play wins, doesnt help that theyve managed 4 turnovers in one half but 5 all year, flukes are flukes
thats why you cap the games and not judge it as a square or sharp bet. sometimes the favorites are gonna cover without breaking a sweat.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nuut str8:
you didnt because you didnt bet it, and if it were always this easy everyone would be rich sometimes the gay square play wins, doesnt help that theyve managed 4 turnovers in one half but 5 all year, flukes are flukes
thats why you cap the games and not judge it as a square or sharp bet. sometimes the favorites are gonna cover without breaking a sweat.
thats why you cap the games and not judge it as a square or sharp bet. sometimes the favorites are gonna cover without breaking a sweat.
there would of been plenty of sweat without a absurd 4 turnovers, Cal was across the 50 on there first drive and fumbled and then again lost the ball at the 50 and USC came away with 3 points, had they started with shitty field posistion OR not stopped Cal it would be a lot different u cant CAP turnovers when USC has forced fucking 5 all year
0
Quote Originally Posted by trying2makeabuk:
thats why you cap the games and not judge it as a square or sharp bet. sometimes the favorites are gonna cover without breaking a sweat.
there would of been plenty of sweat without a absurd 4 turnovers, Cal was across the 50 on there first drive and fumbled and then again lost the ball at the 50 and USC came away with 3 points, had they started with shitty field posistion OR not stopped Cal it would be a lot different u cant CAP turnovers when USC has forced fucking 5 all year
there would of been plenty of sweat without a absurd 4 turnovers, Cal was across the 50 on there first drive and fumbled and then again lost the ball at the 50 and USC came away with 3 points, had they started with shitty field posistion OR not stopped Cal it would be a lot different u cant CAP turnovers when USC has forced fucking 5 all year
Bottom line..........what's the score?
0
Quote Originally Posted by nuut str8:
there would of been plenty of sweat without a absurd 4 turnovers, Cal was across the 50 on there first drive and fumbled and then again lost the ball at the 50 and USC came away with 3 points, had they started with shitty field posistion OR not stopped Cal it would be a lot different u cant CAP turnovers when USC has forced fucking 5 all year
there would of been plenty of sweat without a absurd 4 turnovers, Cal was across the 50 on there first drive and fumbled and then again lost the ball at the 50 and USC came away with 3 points, had they started with shitty field posistion OR not stopped Cal it would be a lot different u cant CAP turnovers when USC has forced fucking 5 all year
well i capped usc would get 2 interceptions today cause of how bad maynard played last week...so yea you can cap turnovers...and stop playing the what if game bro. goodluck tomorrow
0
Quote Originally Posted by nuut str8:
there would of been plenty of sweat without a absurd 4 turnovers, Cal was across the 50 on there first drive and fumbled and then again lost the ball at the 50 and USC came away with 3 points, had they started with shitty field posistion OR not stopped Cal it would be a lot different u cant CAP turnovers when USC has forced fucking 5 all year
well i capped usc would get 2 interceptions today cause of how bad maynard played last week...so yea you can cap turnovers...and stop playing the what if game bro. goodluck tomorrow
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.