The PRD's went 8-8-1 this week. Luckily I was able to cherry pick a few winners that lined up well with my power ratings and situational plays. Still haven't seen that breakout week like I did a few times last season. It will happen, it's just a matter of getting better at finding the ACTUAL running dogs. Like for example Georgia was a running dog last night vs Texas. They just weren't my running dog. Hopefully, the more data that comes in the better these teams will be to spot. This was actually the biggest week for the PRD's. There were 25 of them and they went 17-8. We identified 7 of them and went 5-2. 6-2 if you count Georgia, which I ended up taking anyway. Unfortunately the MAC is killing me, 0-3 and I lost every game by one score. Including CMU who allowed 22 4th quarter points...damn!
Neutral Field: 0-0 … 0-0 (0%) YTD With Better D: 1-2 … 17-8 (68%) YTD With Better D at Home: 1-1 (trifecta teams) … 6-2 (75%) YTD 7 points or more: 3-1-1….. 15-4 (78.95%) YTD … DD 9-1 (90%) YTD (Those two double digit running dogs UCF and Virginia came thru for me this week. UCF could have won)
G5 v P4: 1-0 …. 4-1 (80%) YTD
G5 v G5: 1-4 -1… 10-13 (43.48%) YTD
P4 v P4: 6-4 … 19-16 (54.29%) YTD
ACTUAL Running Dogs: 20-10 (66.67%) YTD
Week # 8: 5-2
Not the ACTUAL Running Dogs: 13-20 (39.39%) YTD
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD: 31-22
Early plays for week 9:
CMU +13
North Texas +8.5
LSU +3
The Running Dogs
YTD: 33-30 (52.38%)
The PRD's went 8-8-1 this week. Luckily I was able to cherry pick a few winners that lined up well with my power ratings and situational plays. Still haven't seen that breakout week like I did a few times last season. It will happen, it's just a matter of getting better at finding the ACTUAL running dogs. Like for example Georgia was a running dog last night vs Texas. They just weren't my running dog. Hopefully, the more data that comes in the better these teams will be to spot. This was actually the biggest week for the PRD's. There were 25 of them and they went 17-8. We identified 7 of them and went 5-2. 6-2 if you count Georgia, which I ended up taking anyway. Unfortunately the MAC is killing me, 0-3 and I lost every game by one score. Including CMU who allowed 22 4th quarter points...damn!
Neutral Field: 0-0 … 0-0 (0%) YTD With Better D: 1-2 … 17-8 (68%) YTD With Better D at Home: 1-1 (trifecta teams) … 6-2 (75%) YTD 7 points or more: 3-1-1….. 15-4 (78.95%) YTD … DD 9-1 (90%) YTD (Those two double digit running dogs UCF and Virginia came thru for me this week. UCF could have won)
Here is my list of running dogs for the week. I'll break down the better D, home field etc. later when I get all my stats together:
Cincinnati +4 Troy +7 Utah State +3 North Texas +8.5 Maryland +6 Auburn +3 Rice +6 CMU +13 UCF +2.5, Texas Tech +5.5 LSU +3 UTEP +7.5 UNC +5, Stanford +3, West Virginia +3...I got these lines this afternoon, so a few of them have probably changed.
If the ODU -2 and Nevada -2 lines flip they would be the running dogs.
0
Here is my list of running dogs for the week. I'll break down the better D, home field etc. later when I get all my stats together:
Cincinnati +4 Troy +7 Utah State +3 North Texas +8.5 Maryland +6 Auburn +3 Rice +6 CMU +13 UCF +2.5, Texas Tech +5.5 LSU +3 UTEP +7.5 UNC +5, Stanford +3, West Virginia +3...I got these lines this afternoon, so a few of them have probably changed.
If the ODU -2 and Nevada -2 lines flip they would be the running dogs.
This is a great thread but I don’t understand all of it. For the uneducated amongst us can I just wait to see your list of plays prior to game time (noting I might get a worse number)?
Cheers…..
1
@DrStrangelove
This is a great thread but I don’t understand all of it. For the uneducated amongst us can I just wait to see your list of plays prior to game time (noting I might get a worse number)?
@DrStrangelove This is a great thread but I don’t understand all of it. For the uneducated amongst us can I just wait to see your list of plays prior to game time (noting I might get a worse number)? Cheers…..
I'll try to keep you updated on the running dogs as the lines change and I have the time to post. Keep in mind that about every week we have line flips on the running dogs where they become the favorites. For instance South Carolina last week went from a 3 point dog to a one point favorite by kickoff. So they would have no longer been considered a running dog (from that point). But I had already played them at +3 on Sunday. These first plays that I make on Sunday are generally my stronger plays because they also line up well with my power rankings.
Last week's official Sunday plays went 3-0-1. The problem is these Sunday plays tend to move with me and are bet down. For example, CMU is down to +12 from +13. And North Texas is down to +7.5 from +8.5. LSU is still +3...Sometimes these lines catch me napping and I don't get the good number. Utah State was going to be one of my Sunday plays, but they went from +3.5 to +2 in a blink of an eye and I didn't catch it in time, and I didn't want to pay -134 juice to get it to +3. Now I've got to wait and see if the line changes in my favor (I need at least +3). It can be to your advantage getting the best numbers with these running dogs. I had a day a couple weeks ago where I won because I took the early line. Turns out those two teams lost ATS with the closing line...Just a reminder, I play all of these running dogs for a half unit on Sunday night. And only put a full unit on the ones I post here as official plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by R1729amanujan:
@DrStrangelove This is a great thread but I don’t understand all of it. For the uneducated amongst us can I just wait to see your list of plays prior to game time (noting I might get a worse number)? Cheers…..
I'll try to keep you updated on the running dogs as the lines change and I have the time to post. Keep in mind that about every week we have line flips on the running dogs where they become the favorites. For instance South Carolina last week went from a 3 point dog to a one point favorite by kickoff. So they would have no longer been considered a running dog (from that point). But I had already played them at +3 on Sunday. These first plays that I make on Sunday are generally my stronger plays because they also line up well with my power rankings.
Last week's official Sunday plays went 3-0-1. The problem is these Sunday plays tend to move with me and are bet down. For example, CMU is down to +12 from +13. And North Texas is down to +7.5 from +8.5. LSU is still +3...Sometimes these lines catch me napping and I don't get the good number. Utah State was going to be one of my Sunday plays, but they went from +3.5 to +2 in a blink of an eye and I didn't catch it in time, and I didn't want to pay -134 juice to get it to +3. Now I've got to wait and see if the line changes in my favor (I need at least +3). It can be to your advantage getting the best numbers with these running dogs. I had a day a couple weeks ago where I won because I took the early line. Turns out those two teams lost ATS with the closing line...Just a reminder, I play all of these running dogs for a half unit on Sunday night. And only put a full unit on the ones I post here as official plays.
I just hit Submit on Rutgers because they are in a nice situation as favorites for most of the season. A recent huge disappointing no show loss 2 games ago. Their top 3 backs average over 5 yards a pop and the lines maker had them favored over Wisconsin, UCLA, A small dog @Virg Tech and +7 @ Nebraska.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Any thoughts on Rutgers +14.5 @ USC
I just hit Submit on Rutgers because they are in a nice situation as favorites for most of the season. A recent huge disappointing no show loss 2 games ago. Their top 3 backs average over 5 yards a pop and the lines maker had them favored over Wisconsin, UCLA, A small dog @Virg Tech and +7 @ Nebraska.
@DrStrangelove Stanford Cincy UCF Utah st lets go 4-0 on these for sure!
I hate that I lost my line edge on Utah St. I REALLY wanted a +3. I'll wait it out and see where it goes. I may play it anyway. Utah St and North Carolina both drive me crazy. I hate both of those teams and their shitty defenses, but somehow they keep qualifying as running dogs. I had Cincy as one of my top "play on" teams before the season and they haven't disappointed. I've already won on them a few times. So they are definitely on my list.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
@DrStrangelove Stanford Cincy UCF Utah st lets go 4-0 on these for sure!
I hate that I lost my line edge on Utah St. I REALLY wanted a +3. I'll wait it out and see where it goes. I may play it anyway. Utah St and North Carolina both drive me crazy. I hate both of those teams and their shitty defenses, but somehow they keep qualifying as running dogs. I had Cincy as one of my top "play on" teams before the season and they haven't disappointed. I've already won on them a few times. So they are definitely on my list.
Any thoughts on Rutgers +14.5 @ USC I just hit Submit on Rutgers because they are in a nice situation as favorites for most of the season. A recent huge disappointing no show loss 2 games ago. Their top 3 backs average over 5 yards a pop and the lines maker had them favored over Wisconsin, UCLA, A small dog @Virg Tech and +7 @ Nebraska.
It's a lot of points, which means I'll probably stay away from it. USC is one of my top 5 "play on" teams this season, so I'm VERY hesitant to play against them. So far they've proven me wrong, especially when they've had to venture into Big 10 country. But something tells me that may change with the Trojans coming down the stretch, because they won't have to leave the west coast for the rest of the season. These Pac-12 teams have struggled on the Big 10 road, but for the most part so have these Big 10 teams when they've had to travel out west. Very few of these teams have been able to cover the spread with the travel. UCLA's win over Rutgers last week was the second that I know of, with the other being Oregon covering against a putrid Purdue team last week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
Any thoughts on Rutgers +14.5 @ USC I just hit Submit on Rutgers because they are in a nice situation as favorites for most of the season. A recent huge disappointing no show loss 2 games ago. Their top 3 backs average over 5 yards a pop and the lines maker had them favored over Wisconsin, UCLA, A small dog @Virg Tech and +7 @ Nebraska.
It's a lot of points, which means I'll probably stay away from it. USC is one of my top 5 "play on" teams this season, so I'm VERY hesitant to play against them. So far they've proven me wrong, especially when they've had to venture into Big 10 country. But something tells me that may change with the Trojans coming down the stretch, because they won't have to leave the west coast for the rest of the season. These Pac-12 teams have struggled on the Big 10 road, but for the most part so have these Big 10 teams when they've had to travel out west. Very few of these teams have been able to cover the spread with the travel. UCLA's win over Rutgers last week was the second that I know of, with the other being Oregon covering against a putrid Purdue team last week.
@DrStrangelove Thank you for your time. Rutgers hits my list this week with no bias against either team here.
Good luck Spottie. This feels like a little more of a favorites week to me this week, but there's always a few hidden gems out there. I hope we can find them!
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
@DrStrangelove Thank you for your time. Rutgers hits my list this week with no bias against either team here.
Good luck Spottie. This feels like a little more of a favorites week to me this week, but there's always a few hidden gems out there. I hope we can find them!
I truly appreciate your posts.l watched West Virginia last week. They are hurting on defense and their quarterback has to have some concerns too, playing like high school quarterback. Terrible last week. Best of luck to you. Prove me wrong!!!
0
@DrStrangelove
I truly appreciate your posts.l watched West Virginia last week. They are hurting on defense and their quarterback has to have some concerns too, playing like high school quarterback. Terrible last week. Best of luck to you. Prove me wrong!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.