All Forums | College Football

fade da cream puff teams week #1

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 982
Posts: 15
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 2669
Posted: #1

take tcu vs Minnesota

take Georgia tec vs alcorn state

take Baylor vs smu

take Illinois vs kent state

take Georgia vs ulm

take lsu vs mcneese st

take Miami vs Bethune cookman

take osu vs va tec note va tech not really a cream puff team but I think osu will be out for revenge the best motivator

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 11665
Posted: #2
what do you think about
Baylor -33 over SMU
Mississippi State -21 over Southern Miss
NC State -22 over Troy


Those are my early leans..I think all three are big mismatches or cream puffs as you say..

Thanks in advance...
LonghornHoosier
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 2669
Posted: #3
I would be concerned about the bulldogs as they only have 4 returning offense starters  and 3 defense starters. however they did beat them last year 49 -0. nc state are a perfect 10-0 against current teams from the sun belt. however troy has a new coach which means huge changes from last years 3-9 season. also quarterback silvers has a mean 71% pass completion record. RB Burks has an average of 6.1 yards per carry.I love Baylor to win big time as smu only won one game last year and averaged 11.9 points per game
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 2669
Posted: #4
Baylor has RB linwood jr averages a whopping 6.9 yards per carry and should be edgible for the nfl draft next year.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 5298
Posted: #5
That's a lot of chalk. Like any Dogs?
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 11665
Posted: #6
I like Northwestern at home +13 as a live dog in week 1...
LonghornHoosier
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 3277
Posted: #7
What about duke ? They lost a ton
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 2669
Posted: #8
I think I would consider dropping the tcu vs Minnesota game cause I don't really consider them a creampuff team I consider creampuff teams to be not from the power 5  conferences.TO be  a creampuff team you have to be from a division 2 school or lower and playing a division 1team
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 2669
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by TD21:

That's a lot of chalk. Like any Dogs?
I don't consider the first week of college football laying a lot of chalk a threat.however if I was to pick a team that looks like a threat it would be Arkansas state. You could take them vs USC. I'm staying away from this game
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 11665
Posted: #10
yep, I like Ark St.   USC will take them lightly as a like a 38 pt dog.   After Ark St plays them close for 3 quarters in a losing effort, USC will open a can of whoop behind on Idaho in week 2 to make up for it...
LonghornHoosier
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 8308
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by hillardoh1:

I think I would consider dropping the tcu vs Minnesota game cause I don't really consider them a creampuff team I consider creampuff teams to be not from the power 5  conferences.TO be  a creampuff team you have to be from a division 2 school or lower and playing a division 1team

OK. Well this is confusing.

First, you defined a "creampuff" as any team not from a Power 5 conference.

You then defined a "creampuff" as any team Division 2 or lower.

A team from the Sun Belt, MAC, MWC, etc, is deemed a "creampuff" under your first definition but not under your second.

There was also no mention of FCS (1-AA) schools.

Please advise.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 37877
Posted: #12

VERY..........

GL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 2669
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by JFen31:


OK. Well this is confusing.

First, you defined a "creampuff" as any team not from a Power 5 conference.

You then defined a "creampuff" as any team Division 2 or lower.

A team from the Sun Belt, MAC, MWC, etc, is deemed a "creampuff" under your first definition but not under your second.

There was also no mention of FCS (1-AA) schools.

Please advise.


the power 5 conferences are acc big 12 ,big 10, pac 12  ,sec. Everyone else just sucks . and will not be in the college playoffs OK sorry you misunderstood me.Well Notre Dame may have achance
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #14
when was the last time a division II team played any division I team?? 

1997
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 930
Posted: #15
In regards to your comments about Mississippi State and their staters...

State returns 52 players who saw valuable time in critical games last season; 14 players returning who have started games; 4 WRs who have had 100 yd games; and 7 different WRs who caught TD passes. Prescott will benefit from the fact that 71% of the Dawgs’ Offensive production returns in 2015. Outside of the OL, which is by far the biggest question mark for State.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.