Interesting u have bowling green as a best bet. Would like to know why so confident in that game rather then anything else on the board today?
Thanks and good luck
Two reasons. I have been riding Bowling Green's jock this season because they have been a covering machine, and the reason they have been a covering machine is because their defense has been playing lights out. Kent had success running the ball on them last week, but Buffalo is not capable of mounting that type of a running attack against this defense. I think the Falcons' defense will hold Buffalo to 14 points or less and win this game comfortably. I look for something like a 31-10 type of score.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jford0523:
Interesting u have bowling green as a best bet. Would like to know why so confident in that game rather then anything else on the board today?
Thanks and good luck
Two reasons. I have been riding Bowling Green's jock this season because they have been a covering machine, and the reason they have been a covering machine is because their defense has been playing lights out. Kent had success running the ball on them last week, but Buffalo is not capable of mounting that type of a running attack against this defense. I think the Falcons' defense will hold Buffalo to 14 points or less and win this game comfortably. I look for something like a 31-10 type of score.
I respect your best bets a lot but I strongly disagree with utep and Ole miss. Your hitting your plays better than me (28-12 vs my 11-3) but I will most likely have Rice and Miss St as large plays this week. And if I do I'll provide my write-ups. BOL this week and thanks for all you do
0
I respect your best bets a lot but I strongly disagree with utep and Ole miss. Your hitting your plays better than me (28-12 vs my 11-3) but I will most likely have Rice and Miss St as large plays this week. And if I do I'll provide my write-ups. BOL this week and thanks for all you do
I am right there with you on some plays (USCe, LSU, UGA and UF). Howevah, the main reason I opened this thread was to see a long write-up on the the 'Iron Bowl'.
0
jimmy,
I am right there with you on some plays (USCe, LSU, UGA and UF). Howevah, the main reason I opened this thread was to see a long write-up on the the 'Iron Bowl'.
I respect your best bets a lot but I strongly disagree with utep and Ole miss. Your hitting your plays better than me (28-12 vs my 11-3) but I will most likely have Rice and Miss St as large plays this week. And if I do I'll provide my write-ups. BOL this week and thanks for all you do
Home game, senior night and Mike Price's farewell game. The UTEP players LOVE Mike Price. They will play their guts out in this game. Yes, Rice-a Roni will be motivated to get their 6th win. I just don;t think they get it.
A similar angle for the Rebels. Dan Mullen has gone out of his way to rub Mississppi's nose in their losing streak to the Bulldogs. Moreover, Mississippi State struggled mightily against a similar offensive scheme. I have no doubt Mississippi will get some revenge in this game.
Would love to see you write-ups on these games.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Laroja:
I respect your best bets a lot but I strongly disagree with utep and Ole miss. Your hitting your plays better than me (28-12 vs my 11-3) but I will most likely have Rice and Miss St as large plays this week. And if I do I'll provide my write-ups. BOL this week and thanks for all you do
Home game, senior night and Mike Price's farewell game. The UTEP players LOVE Mike Price. They will play their guts out in this game. Yes, Rice-a Roni will be motivated to get their 6th win. I just don;t think they get it.
A similar angle for the Rebels. Dan Mullen has gone out of his way to rub Mississppi's nose in their losing streak to the Bulldogs. Moreover, Mississippi State struggled mightily against a similar offensive scheme. I have no doubt Mississippi will get some revenge in this game.
Love the Rutgers/ Pitt Under first half and the Florida matchup under first half.
Rutgers and Pittsburgh both play a conservative style offense and hard nosed defence. And both are SLOW starters this year (Rutgers especially).
In the Florida matchup I think both teams defences will overwhelm the other's offences. Gators are really big and physical in their front seven, and the Seminoles are particularly savy in their secondary (Xavier Rhodes is a top 5 defensive back in all of NCAAF IMO). In a low scoring affair it also makes sense to take the points, which I see you are doing.
Ballsy pick taking the Gamecocks
I think the over is an absolute lock in that game. Could see 85 or 90 being put up.
BOL today brother, I like Northern Illinois and Washington U big today as well
0
Love the Rutgers/ Pitt Under first half and the Florida matchup under first half.
Rutgers and Pittsburgh both play a conservative style offense and hard nosed defence. And both are SLOW starters this year (Rutgers especially).
In the Florida matchup I think both teams defences will overwhelm the other's offences. Gators are really big and physical in their front seven, and the Seminoles are particularly savy in their secondary (Xavier Rhodes is a top 5 defensive back in all of NCAAF IMO). In a low scoring affair it also makes sense to take the points, which I see you are doing.
Ballsy pick taking the Gamecocks
I think the over is an absolute lock in that game. Could see 85 or 90 being put up.
BOL today brother, I like Northern Illinois and Washington U big today as well
I am right there with you on some plays (USCe, LSU, UGA and UF). Howevah, the main reason I opened this thread was to see a long write-up on the the 'Iron Bowl'.
No long write-up. Honestly, before the season began I had planned to "Max Bet" this game. I expected Auburn to be bad this season, but they even exceeded my expectations. That has pushed the line through the roof, and I think taken some of the edge off this game. I think Alabama will probably cover this spread, but I'm not overly confident. I honestly think Saban will do what he needs to do to win the game, and play for the SEC Championship Game. I just don't see him leaving starters in the game and running up the score. If Auburn can manage to score a touchdown in this game, I think they'll cover.
0
Quote Originally Posted by trackem:
jimmy,
I am right there with you on some plays (USCe, LSU, UGA and UF). Howevah, the main reason I opened this thread was to see a long write-up on the the 'Iron Bowl'.
No long write-up. Honestly, before the season began I had planned to "Max Bet" this game. I expected Auburn to be bad this season, but they even exceeded my expectations. That has pushed the line through the roof, and I think taken some of the edge off this game. I think Alabama will probably cover this spread, but I'm not overly confident. I honestly think Saban will do what he needs to do to win the game, and play for the SEC Championship Game. I just don't see him leaving starters in the game and running up the score. If Auburn can manage to score a touchdown in this game, I think they'll cover.
No long write-up. Honestly, before the season began I had planned to "Max Bet" this game. I expected Auburn to be bad this season, but they even exceeded my expectations. That has pushed the line through the roof, and I think taken some of the edge off this game. I think Alabama will probably cover this spread, but I'm not overly confident. I honestly think Saban will do what he needs to do to win the game, and play for the SEC Championship Game. I just don't see him leaving starters in the game and running up the score. If Auburn can manage to score a touchdown in this game, I think they'll cover.
IF I take a stab at it, it wil be on Auburn. This is what I put in my thread:
I think the number is high but it is right about where I thought it would be. I have not looked into this game a lot so far since I just got back from blastin' ducks in Arkansas (if you ever get the chance to go, do it). Off the top of my head, I see no angle for Auburn except maybe special teams. The advantage Alabama has on O and D far out weigh any advantage Auburn may have on special teams. I think Alabama can name the score, right down to how many Auburn has. Alabama being back in the BCS mix may help, in that HCNS will need/want to keep everyone healthy more than avenge The Comeback from 2010. Currently no play, but 31.5 is a lot of points in a rivalry game...
Sounds a lot like yours. The Auburn TT is 7 (-115) at my book. So, the books agree with you as far as Auburn covering if they can (back door) a TD. Wasn't the WKU line 33ish, too?
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
No long write-up. Honestly, before the season began I had planned to "Max Bet" this game. I expected Auburn to be bad this season, but they even exceeded my expectations. That has pushed the line through the roof, and I think taken some of the edge off this game. I think Alabama will probably cover this spread, but I'm not overly confident. I honestly think Saban will do what he needs to do to win the game, and play for the SEC Championship Game. I just don't see him leaving starters in the game and running up the score. If Auburn can manage to score a touchdown in this game, I think they'll cover.
IF I take a stab at it, it wil be on Auburn. This is what I put in my thread:
I think the number is high but it is right about where I thought it would be. I have not looked into this game a lot so far since I just got back from blastin' ducks in Arkansas (if you ever get the chance to go, do it). Off the top of my head, I see no angle for Auburn except maybe special teams. The advantage Alabama has on O and D far out weigh any advantage Auburn may have on special teams. I think Alabama can name the score, right down to how many Auburn has. Alabama being back in the BCS mix may help, in that HCNS will need/want to keep everyone healthy more than avenge The Comeback from 2010. Currently no play, but 31.5 is a lot of points in a rivalry game...
Sounds a lot like yours. The Auburn TT is 7 (-115) at my book. So, the books agree with you as far as Auburn covering if they can (back door) a TD. Wasn't the WKU line 33ish, too?
No long write-up. Honestly, before the season began I had planned to "Max Bet" this game. I expected Auburn to be bad this season, but they even exceeded my expectations. That has pushed the line through the roof, and I think taken some of the edge off this game. I think Alabama will probably cover this spread, but I'm not overly confident. I honestly think Saban will do what he needs to do to win the game, and play for the SEC Championship Game. I just don't see him leaving starters in the game and running up the score. If Auburn can manage to score a touchdown in this game, I think they'll cover.
LIKE ALWAYS YOUR CORRECT FREAK. BAMA WONT KEEP 1ST UNIT THE WHOLE GAME. SO HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT JUST TOUCHING THE 1ST HALF ON BAMA SPREAD OR EVEN JUZ TT. IN MY BOOK THEY STILL DONT HAVE IT BUT IF COMES OUT LIKE -17PTS OR LESS OR BAME TT 20PTS OR LESS. AM ON DAT MORE THEN ANYTHING. WHAT DO YOU THINK FREAK ??
MAD RESPECT..
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
No long write-up. Honestly, before the season began I had planned to "Max Bet" this game. I expected Auburn to be bad this season, but they even exceeded my expectations. That has pushed the line through the roof, and I think taken some of the edge off this game. I think Alabama will probably cover this spread, but I'm not overly confident. I honestly think Saban will do what he needs to do to win the game, and play for the SEC Championship Game. I just don't see him leaving starters in the game and running up the score. If Auburn can manage to score a touchdown in this game, I think they'll cover.
LIKE ALWAYS YOUR CORRECT FREAK. BAMA WONT KEEP 1ST UNIT THE WHOLE GAME. SO HAVE YOU THOUGHT ABOUT JUST TOUCHING THE 1ST HALF ON BAMA SPREAD OR EVEN JUZ TT. IN MY BOOK THEY STILL DONT HAVE IT BUT IF COMES OUT LIKE -17PTS OR LESS OR BAME TT 20PTS OR LESS. AM ON DAT MORE THEN ANYTHING. WHAT DO YOU THINK FREAK ??
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.