If you pick UConn you will lose.
I will book your buddies action.
My play is out there for all to take, including yourself. I've watched UConn many times this year and UCF will win and cover. Plain and simple.
You want to win money, take UCF. That's all I can say.
The Civil Conflict is one of college football's greatest long-standing rivalries. I remember the first game of the heated series between UConn and UCF like it was yesterday. (Probably because it almost was yesterday. The Huskies and Knights have played only the last three years, but UConn coach Bob Diaco declared it a rivalry -- without UCF's knowledge -- and called it "the Civil Conflict.")
UConn has owned this rivalry -- OK, so the Huskies own only a 2-1 lead, but play along with me. This is a huge game -- OK, it will have absolutely no impact on who wins the American Athletic Conference. Still, someone has to win, and that will be the Huskies. In UConn's loss at USF last week, Shirreffs threw for a season-best 306 yards and will take advantage of a UCF defense that allowed a last-second touchdown pass in UCF's loss to Temple last week.
Trying to shake off that 26-25 loss to Temple, UCF will be without starting OL Tyler Hudanick (injury) and WR Tristan Payton (suspension). With a trip to nationally ranked Houston on tap next week, the Knights will likely sleepwalk in rainy, dreary East Hartford. When they wake up, UConn will be back to .500 with another Civil Conflict win.
If you pick UConn you will lose.
I will book your buddies action.
My play is out there for all to take, including yourself. I've watched UConn many times this year and UCF will win and cover. Plain and simple.
You want to win money, take UCF. That's all I can say.
The Civil Conflict is one of college football's greatest long-standing rivalries. I remember the first game of the heated series between UConn and UCF like it was yesterday. (Probably because it almost was yesterday. The Huskies and Knights have played only the last three years, but UConn coach Bob Diaco declared it a rivalry -- without UCF's knowledge -- and called it "the Civil Conflict.")
UConn has owned this rivalry -- OK, so the Huskies own only a 2-1 lead, but play along with me. This is a huge game -- OK, it will have absolutely no impact on who wins the American Athletic Conference. Still, someone has to win, and that will be the Huskies. In UConn's loss at USF last week, Shirreffs threw for a season-best 306 yards and will take advantage of a UCF defense that allowed a last-second touchdown pass in UCF's loss to Temple last week.
Trying to shake off that 26-25 loss to Temple, UCF will be without starting OL Tyler Hudanick (injury) and WR Tristan Payton (suspension). With a trip to nationally ranked Houston on tap next week, the Knights will likely sleepwalk in rainy, dreary East Hartford. When they wake up, UConn will be back to .500 with another Civil Conflict win.
It was such a great play, that you....didn't even play it.
No one feels stupid for making a play and not hitting it. That happens all the time to every bettor.
He made the game his bet of the year. More power to him. I posted a play that will hit and will watch Cincy tomorrow to see what they can do next week against Temple, using the time I spent watching this game to win money next week. Not really a feather out of my cap man.
It was such a great play, that you....didn't even play it.
No one feels stupid for making a play and not hitting it. That happens all the time to every bettor.
He made the game his bet of the year. More power to him. I posted a play that will hit and will watch Cincy tomorrow to see what they can do next week against Temple, using the time I spent watching this game to win money next week. Not really a feather out of my cap man.
The Civil Conflict is one of college football's greatest long-standing rivalries. I remember the first game of the heated series between UConn and UCF like it was yesterday. (Probably because it almost was yesterday. The Huskies and Knights have played only the last three years, but UConn coach Bob Diaco declared it a rivalry -- without UCF's knowledge -- and called it "the Civil Conflict.")
UConn has owned this rivalry -- OK, so the Huskies own only a 2-1 lead, but play along with me. This is a huge game -- OK, it will have absolutely no impact on who wins the American Athletic Conference. Still, someone has to win, and that will be the Huskies. In UConn's loss at USF last week, Shirreffs threw for a season-best 306 yards and will take advantage of a UCF defense that allowed a last-second touchdown pass in UCF's loss to Temple last week.
Trying to shake off that 26-25 loss to Temple, UCF will be without starting OL Tyler Hudanick (injury) and WR Tristan Payton (suspension). With a trip to nationally ranked Houston on tap next week, the Knights will likely sleepwalk in rainy, dreary East Hartford. When they wake up, UConn will be back to .500 with another Civil Conflict win.
Wow. So much wrong with this write-up.
Start with the Civil Conflict: As I noted in my thread, last year's game was a total mismatch. Everyone was injured on UCF and UConn came in like UCF could compete. They went out of their way to humiliate that team, many of whom return this year.
Now they get their comeuppance on UConn's turf. Perfect revenge scenario in the right place/right time.
So erase last year's win and you get 1-1 Diaco vs. UCF.
And Scott Frost, when you see what he's done with UCF in such a short amount of time, is far superior to Diaco, who admittedly, has depreciating assets on his side.
Shirreffs stats last week were bolstered in garbage time when USF crushed them. That 306 is meaningless in that regard.
Finally Tristan Payton didn't even play in the Temple game and has 6 receptions on the year. And that's supposed to be a loss.
And Houston: He's making the incorrect argument. To get to a bowl, you need to beat a soft team like UConn and take your lumps against Houston (who they can also beat Btw). He thinks UCF will sleepwalk in this game.
Whoever wrote that needs to improve his capping and argumentation.
And he's going to pay for it tomorrow with a pick and cap like that.
The Civil Conflict is one of college football's greatest long-standing rivalries. I remember the first game of the heated series between UConn and UCF like it was yesterday. (Probably because it almost was yesterday. The Huskies and Knights have played only the last three years, but UConn coach Bob Diaco declared it a rivalry -- without UCF's knowledge -- and called it "the Civil Conflict.")
UConn has owned this rivalry -- OK, so the Huskies own only a 2-1 lead, but play along with me. This is a huge game -- OK, it will have absolutely no impact on who wins the American Athletic Conference. Still, someone has to win, and that will be the Huskies. In UConn's loss at USF last week, Shirreffs threw for a season-best 306 yards and will take advantage of a UCF defense that allowed a last-second touchdown pass in UCF's loss to Temple last week.
Trying to shake off that 26-25 loss to Temple, UCF will be without starting OL Tyler Hudanick (injury) and WR Tristan Payton (suspension). With a trip to nationally ranked Houston on tap next week, the Knights will likely sleepwalk in rainy, dreary East Hartford. When they wake up, UConn will be back to .500 with another Civil Conflict win.
Wow. So much wrong with this write-up.
Start with the Civil Conflict: As I noted in my thread, last year's game was a total mismatch. Everyone was injured on UCF and UConn came in like UCF could compete. They went out of their way to humiliate that team, many of whom return this year.
Now they get their comeuppance on UConn's turf. Perfect revenge scenario in the right place/right time.
So erase last year's win and you get 1-1 Diaco vs. UCF.
And Scott Frost, when you see what he's done with UCF in such a short amount of time, is far superior to Diaco, who admittedly, has depreciating assets on his side.
Shirreffs stats last week were bolstered in garbage time when USF crushed them. That 306 is meaningless in that regard.
Finally Tristan Payton didn't even play in the Temple game and has 6 receptions on the year. And that's supposed to be a loss.
And Houston: He's making the incorrect argument. To get to a bowl, you need to beat a soft team like UConn and take your lumps against Houston (who they can also beat Btw). He thinks UCF will sleepwalk in this game.
Whoever wrote that needs to improve his capping and argumentation.
And he's going to pay for it tomorrow with a pick and cap like that.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.