All Forums | College Football

Games Im on week 2 NCAAF....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 9764
Posts: 77
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 36843
Posted: #26
Best of Luck
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 1414
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

I think 3.5 is an interesting public number - and Im really not sure which way it will go (if any).

Im only about half in on ND at this point, because the upside of getting to 3 is much better than the downside of laying 4, but at this point I am just watching closely.



I will probably wait it out myself. As we get closer to the weekend the public should start to hit this game more, and I think they take the bait on the +3.5.

Did you get Central Michigan at +14/+14.5? I notice you would take them for 3 units at +12.5, how much bigger would you go with two or more touchdowns?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 59799
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by thegame909:



I will probably wait it out myself. As we get closer to the weekend the public should start to hit this game more, and I think they take the bait on the +3.5.

Did you get Central Michigan at +14/+14.5? I notice you would take them for 3 units at +12.5, how much bigger would you go with two or more touchdowns?

I missed it because I was a moron.  I thought it would hang, and I would wait for higher than opener limits.  So I am in at +13.

But I would add another half unit at 14, and that is where it would max out.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

I agree.  Anything under 14 is stealing!!! 

 




 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 6091
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

For a smaller type of game, SDST Army is getting a lot of strong feelings on both sides....

Interesting game, interesting spot for SDST going east and playing at noon.



Be so obliged....what are you thinking?


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 4585
Posted: #31

 van

On you with TCU and most likely BYU (local giving me +10)

CMU was one of the first plays that stuck out to me, way too many points imo.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 3087
Posted: #32
Nice card Van! Agree with a few, opposite a couple. BOL! 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 5187
Posted: #33
GL Van, BYU and Tulsa have been circled...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

Pretty simple IMO - classic case of week 1 overreaction.

Miss St blows out one of the worst teams in the country (Auburn would beat them by the same score), and Auburn looks terrible and were all over ESPN against a decent Utah St.  Then Lou and the other blowhards at ESPN start talking about how Auburn is in big trouble this season, and you get this line.

Can Miss St win by 7+?   Of course - and the season might prove them to be worthy of that line - but as of now - with the info I have - this is just too much for them to lay.  My line is MSU -2.5.

GL



'preciate the response, 3.5 points (at open) is too much for a public overreaction so I think they're telling us something with the line and I think it's going to keep me off

BOL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54492
Posted: #35

Good lookin card. The only game I am clueless about is UNC, as I simply dont know what to make of that team....

gl this weekend

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 1157
Posted: #36

ND at -3 now.  Time to jump in.  I did!  GL with the card Van.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #37
BOL VAN
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1413
Posted: #38
Good luck Van. I usually don't take teaser, but took Az state -2.5/Auburn +11.5 @ even money 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 129
Posted: #39
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 1839
Posted: #40
UNC pick is dangerous...I am a student and have followed the team closely.  It will be interesting to see if Renner can actually throw an incompletion that is not an interception.  Run D is good, secondary is questionable, but Charles Brown returning gives a big lift.  UNC wins by a TD...not sure about -10.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 1839
Posted: #41
BOL to you. Love the picks though


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 185
Posted: #42
Hey Van, like the card sir, can I pick your brain on the Tennessee-Cincinnati game for a minute.  With the line movement today I read it that Tennessee is going to have problems stopping Cinci.  I also feel Tenn on offense is too big up front for Cinci.  I am not intereseted in laying with Tenn, due to the fact that Florida is on deck.  My play is going to be the over.  I would not be surprised if Cinci hung 30-35 tomorrow.  Clear weather as well.  Any thoughts sir?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 2590
Posted: #43
Cincy is weak in the secondary, and Tennessee should score a lot. Cincy is also the sort of team that historically gives Tennessee's defense a lot of problems, and the Vols did show some weakness on the perimeter against Montana, which Cincy will eat alive if it's there again. 

I just have this nigglin' feeling in the back of my head that the second year of Justin Wilcox's system will produce a defense that succeeds against the spread. That's what he made his living defending at Boise. So I just can't pull the trigger, but I'd say over or nothing. BOL. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54492
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Arid_Torpor:

Cincy is weak in the secondary, and Tennessee should score a lot. Cincy is also the sort of team that historically gives Tennessee's defense a lot of problems, and the Vols did show some weakness on the perimeter against Montana, which Cincy will eat alive if it's there again. 

I just have this nigglin' feeling in the back of my head that the second year of Justin Wilcox's system will produce a defense that succeeds against the spread. That's what he made his living defending at Boise. So I just can't pull the trigger, but I'd say over or nothing. BOL. 

Nigglin' ?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 5770
Posted: #45
BOL van...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 15002
Posted: #46
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 185
Posted: #47
Thanks Arid!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 12648
Posted: #48

Hope you bet the winning sides Vanzack.

 

Here's hoping weather will not be an issue and won't cancel any winning wagers this week

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 6104
Posted: #49
BYU and Auburn and ND 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 969
Posted: #50
On BYU and Notre Dame.....lets get em Van!
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.