All Forums | College Football

I Feel Bad for Wisconsin..............

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5832
Posts: 48
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #26

I know it will be a good game, but the end result will be Stanford winning and covering a 3 pt spread.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 353
Posted: #27

SO DO WE HAVE A BET BLOODANDTHUNDER ON WISKY RUNNING FOR 100+ ?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #28

My statement was hyperbole.

Thought that was obvious with the

Do think Wisky will struggle to run in this one though.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 353
Posted: #29

NO..you put the  in response to the poster saying "they suck big hairy nutz"....

so basically you were just posting nonsense about you thinking that wisky wont run for 100

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 696
Posted: #30
This wont be a blowout....
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #31

Standford will win this game it is my pick this far out minus any major injuries. Spread will be 3 Stanford will cover it will never be in doubt imo.

BOL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 3066
Posted: #32
i love the 5 loss comments about wisconsin, they just beat a 3 loss team by a score of 70-31 and were being nice.

stanford plays it close with most, both teams play similar smash mouth, it will be a slug fest like penn st vs wisconsin game
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #33
line is 7.5

right now i would take WISKY +7.5

but injuries, suspensions, are always possible
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #34

Got the Tree at -6 and think it's a gift. Think line will move to somewhere around 10 all said and done will take Wiskly at that number.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 1194
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

line is 7.5

right now i would take WISKY +7.5

but injuries, suspensions, are always possible

How are injuries and suspensions possible? Not really. You will have more people coming back from injuries...

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 303
Posted: #36
People thinking that Wisconsin will get rolled are really really underestimating them. Seriously has anyone destroyed the badgers this year?? Their biggest loss is by 7 to Ohio st in it. Every other loss by 3. I really don't think Stanford is a powerhouse. They didn't look that great against Oregon st. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #37

Tree one of th best run D's wisky has seen all season.

Hogan is the x factor that covers the spread.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 1442
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:




has stanford "destroyed" anyone this year?


excluding duke?


i dont think so...
Neb. was the 5th ranked DEF. and millions , probably on this site too, posted simila statements befpore the game yesterday. Well we know what happened there. These are basically the same team , but Whisky can run block better. In Fact, if the Off. Coord. played Gordon and White more, one could say the TREE's are the one's who's gonna get spanked. Finally, Coach "B" needs to win this game and he will or the Off. Coord is toast. Badger is the only play. I will be on them "LARGE".
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 1442
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by ashlandarrows:

NO..you put the  in response to the poster saying "they suck big hairy nutz"....

so basically you were just posting nonsense about you thinking that wisky wont run for 100

If Whisky don't run for a TWO HUNDRED Yards . I push a penny From Madison's capitol to Chicagoland. By the way "GO BEARS".
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #40

[Quote: Originally Posted by Da Punishner] If Whisky don't run for a TWO HUNDRED Yards . I push a penny From Madison's capitol to Chicagoland. By the way "GO BEARS". [/Quot

really hoping they don't know. Will you post a video on youtube?

Bears going to blow the division can't believe it.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 642
Posted: #41

Quote Originally Posted by Da Punishner:

Neb. was the 5th ranked DEF. and millions , probably on this site too, posted simila statements befpore the game yesterday. Well we know what happened there. These are basically the same team , but Whisky can run block better. In Fact, if the Off. Coord. played Gordon and White more, one could say the TREE's are the one's who's gonna get spanked. Finally, Coach "B" needs to win this game and he will or the Off. Coord is toast. Badger is the only play. I will be on them "LARGE".

I was on Wisc ML, spread, and pounded their over 2nd half TT.

Nebraska run D is ranked 96th. Rank is a bit skewed by last game by Braska was giving up 166 on the ground b4 that. Their run D was, is, and for the what remains of the season is garbage. UGA will run all over these guys. 

The Tree run D is ranked 3rd giving up 88 yards a game.

Best run D Wisky faced this year was MSU who stonewalled the Badgers in their house.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 11139
Posted: #42
badgers moneyline will be my play of the year
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 224
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by middleman820:

HEY EINSTEIN UCLA PUT UP 284 /7.5 average on Stanford Friday! Did you watch the game? 

     UCLA vs NEB had  344 yds rushing

     Whisky vs NEB  had 544 yds rushing  



That is fairly misleading.  UCLA also threw it all over the place on the Huskers.  Wisco didn't.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by the0ne:

Well see they have ball.


and thats the only thing wisco have....and he might crush in to that Stanford D-line
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1009
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by joshk:



That is fairly misleading.  UCLA also threw it all over the place on the Huskers.  Wisco didn't  have to.

THE FIELD WAS TOO SHORT!! 8 Rushing Touchdowns!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1288
Posted: #46
Stanford may win this game, but 7 points is too much if you ask me.
Stanford doesn't blow teams out and Wisconsin doesn't get blown out...combine that with both teams styles of play and you will most likely get a close game. This is the second best BCS match-up for me (after ND-Bama)....Oregon-KSU close third.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 18880
Posted: #47
wisc m.l. friends
bigFnPOO
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 224
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by middleman820:

THE FIELD WAS TOO SHORT!! 8 Rushing Touchdowns!!!



I'm just saying I feel they are pretty one dimensional.  Stanford actually has a defense.  Nebraska showed that their D was pretty vulnerable. 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.