All Forums | College Football

I Might Be the Biggest Playoff Hater on here, but

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2421
Posts: 44
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #1
I will confess to finding this particular selection quite fascinating, if only as an academic exercise.  I truly don't know if there is a right answer to all of this.  I must be missing something, because I think Clemson should be in the "maybe" mix, but apparently not so much.  Nothing would surprise me.  I'd probably have OSU in and Bama out, but suspect it will be the other way around. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #2
I can only assume that USC is in the mix to try and get more than 11 people in LA to watch this thing.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 7621
Posted: #3
So you saying

Clemson
Oklahoma
Georgia
USC  <<<  I don't think so..  my uncle is an alumni and he doesn't even think so
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #4
I don't understand Clemson as #1.  They not only have a bad loss, they have a loss to a bad team.  Not sure anyone has a better resume than Georgia. 

Bama hasn't looked very good for a month.  No bad losses; no great wins.  Ohio State has two better wins in two weeks than Bama has all year. 

This would be a funny year for the SEC to get two teams in.  SEC not great. 


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by HabsHater88:

So you saying

Clemson
Oklahoma
Georgia
USC  <<<  I don't think so..  my uncle is an alumni and he doesn't even think so


Oh no.    I was stunned anyone was even talking about USC today.     [and your uncle is an alumnus, ]
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 22004
Posted: #6
OSU will get the nod but Bama is a better team 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #7
Clemson probably has the most forgivable loss since Bryant was hurt and it was on a short week.   Ohio State has no excuse for Iowa.  That's the difference to me.   Bama was unspectacular in 2 of their 3 biggest wins also (LSU/Miss St)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5833
Posted: #8
Clemson barely lost to a respectable Syracuse team after their qb was hurt and it was on the road- 

Georgia got absolutely smacked around in their loss although it was by a good Auburn team- 

Clemson is worthy of the #1 ranking IMO-  I believe they have the best wins and hardest schedule-  They have a great shot to win it again but I am pulling for Oklahoma with that offense

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by MaineRoad:

I don't understand Clemson as #1.  They not only have a bad loss, they have a loss to a bad team.  Not sure anyone has a better resume than Georgia. 

Bama hasn't looked very good for a month.  No bad losses; no great wins.  Ohio State has two better wins in two weeks than Bama has all year. 

This would be a funny year for the SEC to get two teams in.  SEC not great. 


So many variables to consider.......the Clemson loss w/o their qb..........OSU beats PSU by a point after a 3 hour storm delay, but gets blown out by a 7-5 Iowa. Many bitched about Hornibrook last night, but Barrett was pretty bad too........he actually kept Wisky in the game..........SEC is down but so is the Big Mac.........tough call.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #10
I agree with all of you about everything.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 5555
Posted: #11
B1G Commish is suing the CFB playoff committee to stop the playoff until the Supreme Court makes a decision.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 5555
Posted: #12
 16 seconds ago

Give the committee credit, putting Alabama in makes total sense. One of the four best.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by cjm2008:

OSU will get the nod but Bama is a better team 


I think I kind of said the opposite.  I'd probably take OSU, but think Bama will get in.  Is OSU "better?"  Who knows.  They have better wins and sketchy losses.  Bama has one good loss.  Toss a coin.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:

Clemson probably has the most forgivable loss since Bryant was hurt and it was on a short week.   Ohio State has no excuse for Iowa.  That's the difference to me.   Bama was unspectacular in 2 of their 3 biggest wins also (LSU/Miss St)


That's the difference
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1148
Posted: #15
Auburn Tigers got ripped off, IMO they should be in the playoffs and not the bulldogs, they beat Bama, Bulldogs game is a wash, 4 teams in the championship games, Auburn beat both of them, LoL The Tigers would had beat OSU and Wisconsin.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #16
The head of the CFP committee was on ESPN radio last wek. he was asked about Clemson being #1.

He said Clemson has 9 wins over top 40 teams.(Now 10 after South Carolina win)

No other team had more than 5.
That was the deciding factor in Clemson being #1 last week. Therefore, why would they drop out of 1 after smashing Miami?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Guy_2U:

Auburn Tigers got ripped off, IMO they should be in the playoffs and not the bulldogs, they beat Bama, Bulldogs game is a wash, 4 teams in the championship games, Auburn beat both of them, LoL The Tigers would had beat OSU and Wisconsin.

Injuries hurt Auburn down the stretch. They aren't the same team that beat UGA  the first time. It's hard to make top 4 with 2 losses. NO 3 loss team is getting in,
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by THE-KID:

The head of the CFP committee was on ESPN radio last wek. he was asked about Clemson being #1.

He said Clemson has 9 wins over top 40 teams.(Now 10 after South Carolina win)

No other team had more than 5.
That was the deciding factor in Clemson being #1 last week. Therefore, why would they drop out of 1 after smashing Miami?


Fair point.  When I say I pay no attention to the Playoff, I'm not kidding.  He may have said they were going to invade Prussia next week and I wouldn't have known.  Sounds like them being #1 is ok.  Somebody has to be. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by Guy_2U:

Auburn Tigers got ripped off, IMO they should be in the playoffs and not the bulldogs, they beat Bama, Bulldogs game is a wash, 4 teams in the championship games, Auburn beat both of them, LoL The Tigers would had beat OSU and Wisconsin.

What?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 1092
Posted: #20
Clemson was getting beat when the qb went out mid game, a loss is a loss. They still deserve to be 1 but I bet they wish the were 2 haha.

Bama has no quality wins and looked brutal against Auburn who turned around and lost haha. Bama is still the favorite to win it all. 

My God, Auburn has 3 losses and USC beat only 1 ranked team I think? Stanford twice? Whatever, PAC 10 is down big.

It is bs but everyone knew they would do whatever to get Bama in. OSU fans travel great but Bama brings in the viewers. It is all about the f’ing money! 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 7183
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:

Clemson probably has the most forgivable loss since Bryant was hurt and it was on a short week.   Ohio State has no excuse for Iowa.  (LSU/Miss St)


Well, it was a pretty big letdown spot, but it shouldn't have turned out like that.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 7183
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Matt3174:

Clemson was getting beat when the qb went out mid game, a loss is a loss.


Bryant was injured before the game even started.  What happened in that game is irrelevant to any analysis of whether Clemson (with a healthy Bryant) is "better" than any other team.

What's really ridiculous is that Bama is in over Auburn.  Auburn is "better" than Alabama, no doubt about it.  The Committee is full of spit with its alleged criteria.  Four best teams are Clemson, Auburn, Georgia, and Oklahoma, not necessarily in that order..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2017
Posts: 41
Posted: #23

Indeed. alabama sits at home while other teams had to play yesterday and inherit the risk of playing a 13th game. So as of today conference championships are meaningless. Alabama got rewarded by sitting out yesterday. A non division,  non conference champ whos best win was miss state and 2nd best win was colorado state sits out championship saturday. Not one pundit on tv or radio spoke about rewarding teams who play the extra game and taking the additional risk of losing or injury. Clemson should not have played yesterday and said f that. A two loss clemson has a better resume than alabama.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by mws:



Bryant was injured before the game even started.  What happened in that game is irrelevant to any analysis of whether Clemson (with a healthy Bryant) is "better" than any other team.

What's really ridiculous is that Bama is in over Auburn.  Auburn is "better" than Alabama, no doubt about it.  The Committee is full of spit with its alleged criteria.  Four best teams are Clemson, Auburn, Georgia, and Oklahoma, not necessarily in that order..
Auburn passes some eye tests........until you eye the "3" in the loss column. Had they won last night we would've had a two-loss team in the playoff.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

Auburn passes some eye tests........until you eye the "3" in the loss column. Had they won last night we would've had a two-loss team in the playoff.
  

Yes.   Auburn HAD a chance to get in and failed.  That is on them


One thing that bugs me now in hindsight...  why did the Committee even drop Bama out of the top 4 last week?   Did they really feel that Wisconsin was better than Bama?  Would that criteria have still held if Wisconsin had won last night?   Would they sit here today and tell Bama fans that Wisconsin is a better team?   
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.