Dabo >> first interview I have EVER seen him like a deer in headlights!
He knows it... damn, I love Clemson but I bet with my head and on motivation. Clemson won last year, how motivated are they to slay Alabama?? Dabo wanted one more shot with the kid Lawrence but remember how his teams were constructed while he was rising as a coach, on the defensive end and more attention needed to be paid there if you were watching their scores and when they played this season. Buckeyes had a far tougher schedule and had to deal with size/speed almost every game....can't say the same for the Clemson schedule
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
1
Dabo >> first interview I have EVER seen him like a deer in headlights!
He knows it... damn, I love Clemson but I bet with my head and on motivation. Clemson won last year, how motivated are they to slay Alabama?? Dabo wanted one more shot with the kid Lawrence but remember how his teams were constructed while he was rising as a coach, on the defensive end and more attention needed to be paid there if you were watching their scores and when they played this season. Buckeyes had a far tougher schedule and had to deal with size/speed almost every game....can't say the same for the Clemson schedule
Dabo knows they are in a terrible position defensively. Their defense isn't even set 90% of the time and OSU is just using tempo to run all over them. Losing Skalski definitely hurt them as well because they don't have a defensive leader now.
1
Dabo knows they are in a terrible position defensively. Their defense isn't even set 90% of the time and OSU is just using tempo to run all over them. Losing Skalski definitely hurt them as well because they don't have a defensive leader now.
@Last2thirst Huge mistake. 11th best team in the country....huh, Dabo!?
Jeff Sagarin had Buckeyes rated as a 107 team rating....Bama at 101 and Clemson at 99.....and that was after Clemson and Bama played their first couple of games, including Alabama dismantling Texas AM 52-24 in the first game
Reading lots of people touting AM to be in final four....maybe...but the question becomes, if this score stays a 14 pt or higher win for the Buckeyes, should Clemson have been in the Final Four given they went 1-1 with the Irish and had a softer schedule? (Sounds crazy to say that and by no means do I believe that but discuss....)
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by stocker08:
@Last2thirst Huge mistake. 11th best team in the country....huh, Dabo!?
Jeff Sagarin had Buckeyes rated as a 107 team rating....Bama at 101 and Clemson at 99.....and that was after Clemson and Bama played their first couple of games, including Alabama dismantling Texas AM 52-24 in the first game
Reading lots of people touting AM to be in final four....maybe...but the question becomes, if this score stays a 14 pt or higher win for the Buckeyes, should Clemson have been in the Final Four given they went 1-1 with the Irish and had a softer schedule? (Sounds crazy to say that and by no means do I believe that but discuss....)
I wouldn't touch a 2nd half bet other than the Buckeyes because they are full of hate and it won't let up even if Fabio hooks a quick TD after the Buckeyes get it first
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
I wouldn't touch a 2nd half bet other than the Buckeyes because they are full of hate and it won't let up even if Fabio hooks a quick TD after the Buckeyes get it first
Clemson will fight back but no way they make up 3 scores when they can't stop anyone. That pick gives them a glimmer of hope bad mistake as any points there probably ices the game they should have kept running
0
Clemson will fight back but no way they make up 3 scores when they can't stop anyone. That pick gives them a glimmer of hope bad mistake as any points there probably ices the game they should have kept running
Quote Originally Posted by stocker08: @Last2thirst Huge mistake. 11th best team in the country....huh, Dabo!? Jeff Sagarin had Buckeyes rated as a 107 team rating....Bama at 101 and Clemson at 99.....and that was after Clemson and Bama played their first couple of games, including Alabama dismantling Texas AM 52-24 in the first game Reading lots of people touting AM to be in final four....maybe...but the question becomes, if this score stays a 14 pt or higher win for the Buckeyes, should Clemson have been in the Final Four given they went 1-1 with the Irish and had a softer schedule? (Sounds crazy to say that and by no means do I believe that but discuss....)
You make a valid point to discuss. The only thing was ND beat a Clem without Sunshine and what 3 or 4 defensive starters. Hell, I would have rather seen OU, as they were playing solid ball at the end of the season.
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
0
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
Quote Originally Posted by stocker08: @Last2thirst Huge mistake. 11th best team in the country....huh, Dabo!? Jeff Sagarin had Buckeyes rated as a 107 team rating....Bama at 101 and Clemson at 99.....and that was after Clemson and Bama played their first couple of games, including Alabama dismantling Texas AM 52-24 in the first game Reading lots of people touting AM to be in final four....maybe...but the question becomes, if this score stays a 14 pt or higher win for the Buckeyes, should Clemson have been in the Final Four given they went 1-1 with the Irish and had a softer schedule? (Sounds crazy to say that and by no means do I believe that but discuss....)
You make a valid point to discuss. The only thing was ND beat a Clem without Sunshine and what 3 or 4 defensive starters. Hell, I would have rather seen OU, as they were playing solid ball at the end of the season.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
