While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama
Under 67.5
5
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
14-10 College Football
22-12 NFL
5-2 yesterday NCAAF
Today's picks"
Ole Miss +9
While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama
Like the phixer used to say - it is always great to be on the right side of the phix
What happened to the phixer? If I remember correctly he came in here a complete unknown and was red hot with his picks. Hitting about 80% for a few weeks. Then he went on a losing streak and vanished.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mick960:
Like the phixer used to say - it is always great to be on the right side of the phix
What happened to the phixer? If I remember correctly he came in here a complete unknown and was red hot with his picks. Hitting about 80% for a few weeks. Then he went on a losing streak and vanished.
14-10 College Football 22-12 NFL 5-2 yesterday NCAAF Today's picks" Ole Miss +9 While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama Under 67.5
Perfect. Great job Allall
1
Quote Originally Posted by 14allall41:
14-10 College Football 22-12 NFL 5-2 yesterday NCAAF Today's picks" Ole Miss +9 While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama Under 67.5
14-10 College Football 22-12 NFL 5-2 yesterday NCAAF Today's picks" Ole Miss +9 While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama Under 67.5
You sure look like a genius
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14allall41:
14-10 College Football 22-12 NFL 5-2 yesterday NCAAF Today's picks" Ole Miss +9 While all the arrows "clearly" point out at the Hoosiers direction for an easy win and cover against Ole Miss who has the players who opted out of the game. Yes, the same Hoosiers that lost only by a TD to Ohio State with Justin Fields etc. Yes, The same Hoosiers who have an iron defense according to their last win against the Badgers and the same Hoosiers who covered all of their 7 games ATS. And the team they are facing is broken down Ole Miss with no aspirations whatsoever and with half the regular roster. And the line is only -9 Hoosiers. Like a TD and the FG can take care of the business. Wow. A gift. No thanks. Why? Well, let me start from that the the cover against the Buckeyes was a clear backdoor cover classic from the books. Look at the score line. Then, a win against the Badgers was somewhat the Badgers beating themselves. Now, Ole Miss scored 48 points in each of the losses to Alabama and LSU. And another very special reason for my pick is the money. There is less money percentage wise on the Hoosiers than the number of bets. That says that there are few very large bets on Ole Miss covering. So, either someone is parlaying big with ML and is trying to middle ATS or there are some large bets on Ole Miss by those who know the Hoosiers will win and not pass the opportunity to bring home a Bowl win after long long years. One way or another - I'm on Ole Miss. In just few hours I might look like a biggest idiot who passed such clear win or I might look like a genius. I tell you already now - I'm neither. Just a person who is trying to make some betting sense in the season where Justin Fields becomes a threat to Alabama Under 67.5
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.