All Forums | College Football

Lmao why no FG?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1192
Posts: 36
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 17292
Posted: #1
Dumbass Nevada coach LMAO

Take the points then try onside kick

“It’s not a lie, if you believe it”
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #2

OMFG

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2017
Posts: 3853
Posted: #3
Lmao dude its not the coach its the ending books needed

All that movement today we ALL know why now 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #4

Why go for 2 when you are down 9?

Why run a double reverse trick play from the 3?

Coach is Awful angry

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2017
Posts: 2632
Posted: #5

Yup total fix job. I got a bad line at 7.5 last night and you know some people cleaning up because of that no fg

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 7215
Posted: #6
the 2 most boneheaded coaching decisions back-to-back.....

no XP, go for 2 .... absolutely stupid when you'd be down 8

and

no FG, onside kick.... go for it on 4th and goal from the 8...not the 1, the 8...

absolutely baffling. coach should be fired on the spot. horrendous coaching,
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 13241
Posted: #7

Dumb fukk went for two down 9 earlier as well. Kick the extra point to keep it a one score game. 

You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2017
Posts: 2632
Posted: #8

It’s so god damn fixed. These fucks with all this behind the scenes corruption. They living like Kings while the weekend warrior bettor gets fucked. It’s why gambling is such a waste of time. Every day of the week and twice on a Sunday you luck that field goal and get he onside kick 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 17292
Posted: #9
Lol yup just realized would have been an 8 point game to kick the FG

Wow how pathetic 
“It’s not a lie, if you believe it”
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2362
Posted: #10

2 Things:

 

1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.

 

2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

2 Things:   1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.   2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.

 

Dude, there were over 2 minutes left

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 13241
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

2 Things:   1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.   2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.

I don't agree at all with number one. Kick the extra point then it is a one possession game still. 

You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 3989
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

2 Things:

 

1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.

 

2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.


You extend the game period...how the phuck are you a coach would be my question at post game...even if I get fired saying it 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2016
Posts: 538
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

2 Things:   1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.   2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.

An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2362
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman:

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

2 Things:   1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.   2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
I don't agree at all with number one. Kick the extra point then it is a one possession game still.

 

That's why you are posting on Covers and a data scientist is getting paid 500k to work for NFL teams to figure these things out.

I understand your thinking. But, you need to understand that there are 2 possessions. There is no difference if you miss the 2pt conversion on the first TD or the 2nd TD. 

Explain the difference and I'll listen...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2362
Posted: #16

Quote Originally Posted by JayDubsJr:

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

2 Things:   1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.   2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.

 

And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws. 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #17

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.

Total BS, there are no analytics to support this.  The risk of going down two scores far outweighs getting it to 7.

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2019
Posts: 828
Posted: #18
this game was BS from the start lol. ohio milking clock and running almost every play in the 1st quarter.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws.

Dude, they had like 4-5 of those 20+ pass plays in the 4th.  Ohio defense was gassed.  You should stop while you're behind an_roll_laugh

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2019
Posts: 235
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:


You extend the game period...how the phuck are you a coach would be my question at post game...even if I get fired saying it 

He got a call from johnny in the mobb and said that if he went for the fg he would come after his family. The quarterback was told to fall back otherwise he wouldve ended up dead like micharl jordans dad. Them dudes dont play
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2362
Posted: #21

Quote Originally Posted by Ace of Spades:

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
Total BS, there are no analytics to support this.  The risk of going down two scores far outweighs getting it to 7.

 

It would have been 8 points, which means they still had to score a 2pt conversion. You don't even know what you're arguing about.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2016
Posts: 538
Posted: #22

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.
  And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws.

Why even practice a 2 minute drill then? That's what they would've had, with great positioning. You can come up with whatever scenarios you want in your head but if you're a smart coach and you just watched your QB overthrow everything on the previous 3 downs, you should be able to see that you need to take the points when you can and reset for if you get another chance to win. 

Why even practice a 2 minute drill then? That's what they would've had, with great positioning. You can come up with whatever scenarios you want in your head but if you're a smart coach and you just watched your QB overthrow everything on the previous 3 downs, you should be able to see that you need to take the points when you can and reset for if you get another chance to win. 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #23

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

That's why you are posting on Covers and a data scientist is getting paid 500k to work for NFL teams to figure these things out. I understand your thinking. But, you need to understand that there are 2 possessions. There is no difference if you miss the 2pt conversion on the first TD or the 2nd TD.  Explain the difference and I'll listen...

The Difference is that you are down ONE possession or TWO possessions.  It gives your team momentum just to know you are one touchdown away.

And NO data scientist agrees with you in this situation.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6515
Posted: #24

This is all hogwash. Ohio should've won that by 30. No reason to be upset. Nevada had absolutely no business being close in that game.

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 989
Posted: #25

Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:

The risk of going down two scores far outweighs getting it to 7.
  It would have been 8 points, which means they still had to score a 2pt conversion. You don't even know what you're arguing about.

God you're a dunce 

God you're a dunce 

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.