All Forums | College Football

Mizzou/Nevada thoughts?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2073
Posts: 38
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2275
Posted: #1
Mizzou -7 and 61.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1280
Posted: #2
I have already played Nevada +7 but if the line should go up higher, I will add some more. If this were week 1, I think it would be a pickem and Nevada is desperate. Talent levels are comparable with an overrated team versus a team that isn't underrated but definately undervalued as a home dog in a desperate situation.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20643
Posted: #3
this would never be a pickem
Mizzou beat em by like 40 last year
NV overmatched and 1 dimensional
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1280
Posted: #4
yeah, i probably overestimated what the line would be.....maybe -2.5.........remember illinois was a 7 point fav over missou in week 1 on a neutral field, but closer to their home turf.......missou overvalued for sure......nevada probably gets this or loses by a fg
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 2709
Posted: #5
OVERRR
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #6
NEVADA SUCKS!!!!! Mizzou just reloaded. been saying that since everyone said "they lost Daniels and Macklin so they will suck". They recruit well now and its the SYSTEM that makes the players. Think about it; Big 12 vs NEVADA?? Did anybody watch Pumpernickel ( I got that from somebody else) play QB against ND????? FUCK Nevada, if I'm goin down its with the better TEAM!!!! Gimme Mizzou and the OVER. 49-21
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2000
Posts: 3161
Posted: #7
NEV is a div 2 team
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1280
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by jackal7130:

NEVADA SUCKS!!!!! Mizzou just reloaded. been saying that since everyone said "they lost Daniels and Macklin so they will suck". They recruit well now and its the SYSTEM that makes the players. Think about it; Big 12 vs NEVADA?? Did anybody watch Pumpernickel ( I got that from somebody else) play QB against ND????? FUCK Nevada, if I'm goin down its with the better TEAM!!!! Gimme Mizzou and the OVER. 49-21

 

how does the run defense of nevada match up with the o-line of the tigers?

how about offensive philosophy of nevada against the stregnths/weaknesses of the tigers defense?

any thoughts on special teams?

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 30
Posted: #9
Mizzou 38-17............Gabbert keeps getting better- he will blow em up....Mizz improved defense too fast for Nevada
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 3091
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by jackal7130:

NEVADA SUCKS!!!!! Mizzou just reloaded. been saying that since everyone said "they lost Daniels and Macklin so they will suck". They recruit well now and its the SYSTEM that makes the players. Think about it; Big 12 vs NEVADA?? Did anybody watch Pumpernickel ( I got that from somebody else) play QB against ND????? FUCK Nevada, if I'm goin down its with the better TEAM!!!! Gimme Mizzou and the OVER. 49-21

You are comparing Mizzu talent to ND talent?? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #11
Anywhere in that post did I compare ANYBODY to ANYBODY????
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #12
I like Nevada Tomorrow....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 30
Posted: #13
Missou talent may not be ND talent but Pinkel has recruited his ass off last several years and has put together some pretty highly ranked recruiting classes and stolen players from others like gabbert who had committed to nebraska
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #14
I did until I watched Ole Miss. I came to my senses.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #15
I see alot of love for Nevada on this forum. I for one cant give them any backing this week, they were a favorite last week on the road & got clocked. Neveda lost alot of players from last year, I see a blowout, but then again, anything can happen.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20643
Posted: #16
NV is just not playing good ball.
have given up 70 points in 2 games!.
they had 3 fumbles lost vs Co St.
I think Mizzou hammers them. theyre bigger and faster
and more balanced on O
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #17
BB dont sugar coat it .. On a Nuetral field, the Domers go down to Mizzou. What, they LOSE to a rebuilding Mich team, beat "Nevada" and get lucky against Mich St and  they're NAT CHAMP Material???????? PLEASE!!!!!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #18
Guys........Weird Shit Happens Out There...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #19
63-7 last year??? Why any different this year???
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #20
I'll take my chances with Mizzou.I think that one goes over though. Gl all this weekend
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20643
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Guys........Weird Shit Happens Out There...


Thats my line.. Lol

No, Only on Thurs night games

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 4058
Posted: #22
Right now, it's the Over for me.  Nevada can't stay in nap mode again, can they?  When the line goes to 7.5, I'll get on Nevada for a small play.
 
No idea how accurate this site is...I doubt that 93% of the money is on MU.  But I wouldn't doubt the majority is.  And the line dropped? hello
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 67
Posted: #23
NEVADA ML FOR 100.00 to the bank. First off let me tell you the ref that will be calling the game on the field is a homer from carson city nevada, not only that he has a brother in law who works at a book in Vegas. Which one i am not going to say but it is small book with big time $ going through it. Now another thing u need to understand this game is being played in "VEGAS"  If u go back and look at stats wth nevada and unly playing games at home 83% of the time those 2 teams get a cover.. Just a word of advice i got from a birdie but do as you wish. ALOT of $ is on mizz yet the line has held. Think abt it. Nevada will get a straight up win here and u can take it to the bank. Just watch in the 3rd quarter u will c a few weird call go nevada way.  Thats all i can say..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 4058
Posted: #24
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

I see alot of love for Nevada on this forum. I for one cant give them any backing this week, they were a favorite last week on the road & got clocked. Neveda lost alot of players from last year, I see a blowout, but then again, anything can happen.



Thats interesting. Tell me what the forum looks like a hour before kickoff...
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.