Week 11 *Updated Card*
Tue: EMU + Ohio over 61.5 .33u
Wed: Kent State ML +125 .33 u
Thur:
Fri:
Saturday:
UTEP -1 +103
Sou Alabama +22.5
Oklahoma -5.5
Week 11 *Updated Card*
Tue: EMU + Ohio over 61.5 .33u
Wed: Kent State ML +125 .33 u
Thur:
Fri:
Saturday:
UTEP -1 +103
Sou Alabama +22.5
Oklahoma -5.5
Week 11 *Updated Card*
Tue: EMU + Ohio over 61.5 .33u
Wed: Kent State ML +125 .33 u
Thur:
Fri:
Saturday:
UTEP -1 +103
Sou Alabama +22.5
Oklahoma -5.5
FYI you are a total joke and your plays suck.
FYI you are a total joke and your plays suck.
thank you all for the kind words...very much appreciated.
@insatiable
@D-Town
@SteamCave
@LoveCFB1_
@FoxinSocks
@lordzud
@Spyder_Man
@Bridge1
@JonBones
@ChalkisGold
thank you all for the kind words...very much appreciated.
@insatiable
@D-Town
@SteamCave
@LoveCFB1_
@FoxinSocks
@lordzud
@Spyder_Man
@Bridge1
@JonBones
@ChalkisGold
Week 11 *Updated Card*
Tue: EMU + Ohio over 61.5 .33u
Wed: Kent State ML +125 .33 u
Thur:
Fri:
Saturday:
UTEP -1 +103
Sou Alabama +22.5
Oklahoma -5.5
Washington State +14
Duke + VT over 50
ECU +6
Week 11 *Updated Card*
Tue: EMU + Ohio over 61.5 .33u
Wed: Kent State ML +125 .33 u
Thur:
Fri:
Saturday:
UTEP -1 +103
Sou Alabama +22.5
Oklahoma -5.5
Washington State +14
Duke + VT over 50
ECU +6
@steponaduck
Congrats on the amazing season. I think people don’t get that different books post different numbers and different times. If you post +3 on Monday at 2pm from book X and some yahoo complains that book Y in another state on Wednesday at 9am is hanging a +1, that’s their problem not yours.
@steponaduck
Congrats on the amazing season. I think people don’t get that different books post different numbers and different times. If you post +3 on Monday at 2pm from book X and some yahoo complains that book Y in another state on Wednesday at 9am is hanging a +1, that’s their problem not yours.
Any idea why EMU went for a 2 point conversion with two and a half minutes left in the game when they were going to need another possession and a TD anyway? I parlayed all 3 MAC games with the over on each. That play killed it.
Any idea why EMU went for a 2 point conversion with two and a half minutes left in the game when they were going to need another possession and a TD anyway? I parlayed all 3 MAC games with the over on each. That play killed it.
Duck has made 159 picks. Congrats you may have found one pick that might lose. Duck is 58.9% on the year so he has a 41.1% chance of losing. You don't post so I assume your % is around 50%. I just find this to be funny.
I am not involved with the play at all and I don't care if you win or lose. Your post holds 0 value, thats a fact
Duck has made 159 picks. Congrats you may have found one pick that might lose. Duck is 58.9% on the year so he has a 41.1% chance of losing. You don't post so I assume your % is around 50%. I just find this to be funny.
I am not involved with the play at all and I don't care if you win or lose. Your post holds 0 value, thats a fact
Thats a fact
Thats a fact
@Hoosier4809
Turned my 3-team into a 2-teamer.
The nerds in the analytics dept. say go for it.
Found this in an ESPN article:
Because the odds of converting a 2-point conversion once in one try are higher than failing twice in two tries.
Assuming the team is going to score another touchdown -- none of this matters if it doesn't -- and prevents the opponent from scoring again, going for two now gives it an informational advantage that indicates what to do after its next touchdown.
If the team converts on the first 2-point try, it knows it only needs a PAT on the second touchdown to win.
If it fails, the team knows that it has to go for 2 again the second time to have a chance to tie.
Kicking two extra points maximizes the chance to reach overtime. Attempting a 2-point conversion when down 8 points late maximizes the chance to win the game, which is the ultimate goal.
@Hoosier4809
Turned my 3-team into a 2-teamer.
The nerds in the analytics dept. say go for it.
Found this in an ESPN article:
Because the odds of converting a 2-point conversion once in one try are higher than failing twice in two tries.
Assuming the team is going to score another touchdown -- none of this matters if it doesn't -- and prevents the opponent from scoring again, going for two now gives it an informational advantage that indicates what to do after its next touchdown.
If the team converts on the first 2-point try, it knows it only needs a PAT on the second touchdown to win.
If it fails, the team knows that it has to go for 2 again the second time to have a chance to tie.
Kicking two extra points maximizes the chance to reach overtime. Attempting a 2-point conversion when down 8 points late maximizes the chance to win the game, which is the ultimate goal.
i support EMU decision to go for 2...what really burned us was the FG fest in the 2nd quarter and limited scoring by EMU in the third...EMU had nearly 500 yards...and scored 26 points. I would make this bet again.
with miami oh winning kent state needs to keep their foot on the gas, and i fully expect them to do okay in this game.
due to this being a week day contest, and my weekday plays being so bad (before last week 5-0 during the week), I made a rule that i was going to limit weekday plays to .33u. what does that mean. well, if you normally bet $1000 a game (not unrealistic), bet $333 during the week. Bet $100 a game? Bet $33 during the week... seems easy, right?
People on Covers amaze me...can you not handle a losing day? they are going to happen. I do give max effort on here, provide write ups when requested, give insite to why I make a certain play...Losing one play is not the end of the world. Trust me, I pick losers 41% of the time.
Wednesday, the +3 is long gone, but I also like the alternate line of Kent State -1.5 +133. Great odds for a team that can absolutely win the game on the field tonight.
i support EMU decision to go for 2...what really burned us was the FG fest in the 2nd quarter and limited scoring by EMU in the third...EMU had nearly 500 yards...and scored 26 points. I would make this bet again.
with miami oh winning kent state needs to keep their foot on the gas, and i fully expect them to do okay in this game.
due to this being a week day contest, and my weekday plays being so bad (before last week 5-0 during the week), I made a rule that i was going to limit weekday plays to .33u. what does that mean. well, if you normally bet $1000 a game (not unrealistic), bet $333 during the week. Bet $100 a game? Bet $33 during the week... seems easy, right?
People on Covers amaze me...can you not handle a losing day? they are going to happen. I do give max effort on here, provide write ups when requested, give insite to why I make a certain play...Losing one play is not the end of the world. Trust me, I pick losers 41% of the time.
Wednesday, the +3 is long gone, but I also like the alternate line of Kent State -1.5 +133. Great odds for a team that can absolutely win the game on the field tonight.
....and...YOUR-"opinion", on MY-"opinion"...
ALSO "holds"-ZERO-value to me,...AS WELL!!!
I am NOT "bashing"!!!
I don't bash ANYONE!!!
AND...I TOTALLY respect "steponaduck" as a capper.
I was simply, "stating an opinion", on ONE-OF his picks, which i happen to feel strongly about, so that others, INCLUDING "steponaduck", should-&-can be "a-little-wary-of"...
... "opinion-&-input", which i believe, this forum is ALL-about!!!
Basically...YOU...are "bashing" MY opinion
And...if I mean "ZERO"-to-you...
...then, YOU... mean...
EVEN-LESS-THAN-ZERO...TO-ME!!!!!
....and...YOUR-"opinion", on MY-"opinion"...
ALSO "holds"-ZERO-value to me,...AS WELL!!!
I am NOT "bashing"!!!
I don't bash ANYONE!!!
AND...I TOTALLY respect "steponaduck" as a capper.
I was simply, "stating an opinion", on ONE-OF his picks, which i happen to feel strongly about, so that others, INCLUDING "steponaduck", should-&-can be "a-little-wary-of"...
... "opinion-&-input", which i believe, this forum is ALL-about!!!
Basically...YOU...are "bashing" MY opinion
And...if I mean "ZERO"-to-you...
...then, YOU... mean...
EVEN-LESS-THAN-ZERO...TO-ME!!!!!
@steponaduck
lajohn is using your greatness to elevate his ineptness. Cant make a thread to elevate his own status so he uses a winning thread like yours to do so.
part of the process of posting, sad but true
Best wishes
@steponaduck
lajohn is using your greatness to elevate his ineptness. Cant make a thread to elevate his own status so he uses a winning thread like yours to do so.
part of the process of posting, sad but true
Best wishes
you provided only a selection against his with no reasoning and no opportunity to combat your pick. The way you communicate your selection is piss poor. Thats a fact now run along or make your own thread
you provided only a selection against his with no reasoning and no opportunity to combat your pick. The way you communicate your selection is piss poor. Thats a fact now run along or make your own thread
Good I am glad i mean nothing to you. Now run along and don't respond. Your communication skills are sub par Its his thread I am not going back and forth here. Say what ever you want, I am done i have respect for the cappers that post regularly.
Good I am glad i mean nothing to you. Now run along and don't respond. Your communication skills are sub par Its his thread I am not going back and forth here. Say what ever you want, I am done i have respect for the cappers that post regularly.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.