All Forums | College Football

*** NCAA Football Week 9 ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 87399
Posts: 328
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 19093
Posted: #201
Quote Originally Posted by Pony_Express:



Maybe because the guy has a mind of his own and he isn't a kiss-ass sheep like some people. Bah, bah, I'm your online friend Boom, bah.
Now the pieces of the puzlle are coming together, i see ...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #202

Quote Originally Posted by tinoker55:

Why would you like oddsballs??? hope you dont tail him..

He is very annoying. 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 19093
Posted: #203
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:

He is very annoying. 

  Yes he is..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 48
Posted: #204
BOOM - will you be betting NFL this week as well? Have some good picks that I'd like to run by you
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 6378
Posted: #205
Quote Originally Posted by fsudogfan85:

Hey Boom, it's cool.  Bad weeks happen, but as I said last week, I do think you have a lot of knowledge.  Hey, I feel bad for anyone who took up my suggestion to play Utah State -6.5 vs. La Tech since it was my "WAC pick of the week", and sadly I hit the other two WAC games that I picked instead - Fresno State +9.5 @ Nevada (they scored with only 1:06 on the clock for a back door cover) and New Mexico St. +21 @ Hawaii (it was mostly a two-score game the whole way with Hawaii only winning by 11).  Why, oh why didn't I give either of the other two?  Well I thought about making Fresno State my pick of the week but since I'm an unabashed fan I thought folks would just think I'm a f'ing homer.  And yes, for experienced cappers as yourself, you keep callin' 'em as you see 'em, and the good weeks outweigh the bad.  I was on different sides of some of your key bets.  I didn't think Notre Dame would cover giving that many points to the Condoms mainly because Barkley is a very good quarterback (I'm surprised you never mention him - IMO he is second only to Andrew Luck among college QBs who are not in a no-huddle or spread offense).  Also on Michigan State - just feel they're in Wisconsin's heads and I was also impressed at how they bottled up Denard last week.  On a bad note, I was just as aghast as you at what is happening to Georgia Tech.  They're a wreck all right, but they ain't ramblin' any more.  I know you'll have a better week, just hang in there and do what you gotta do.  Good luck to you.



It's coaching pure and simple.  Mich St has one of the very best in the country.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 458
Posted: #206

Lets get em boom

Love the ark. play

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1344
Posted: #207
gl boom ....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #208
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:

He is very annoying. 

How so? Because I question something on an online forum? Do tell...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 20924
Posted: #209
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

How so? Because I question something on an online forum? Do tell...
I post by questioning other's integrity, honesty and reasoning for a certain pick at time's. Does this make me wrong? In some eye's, possibly. Lot's of people on this form feel threatened when other's question something posted by another. It doesn't take a mastermind to figure out most on this forum. It is more than a mistake to argue with another on a public forum such as this one and sadly Iv'e done so many times thinking something might sink in to other's. Shame on me...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #210
GL Boom. Clemson will cover this week. What makes more sense, a hater trying to guess when a hot team stops covering, or simply rolling with the hot team.  They have covered enough for me to ride it out.  If you don't like Clemson, don't bet them. I will be!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #211
Quote Originally Posted by BigTenWatto:

Hey Boom, continue to like your work but, just like last week when I was concerned about Minnesota, it looks like I will be on the other side of a game in a big way. Baylor - OK ST this week confuses me when it comes to your bet. Are you simply going on the RGIII love? OK ST has covered 5 straight times against Baylor, 2 of those with RG at the helm. Its in Stillwater and Baylor is 0-2 ATS on the road this year. And obviously OK ST has covered every game, handily I might add.
Lastly, they have a common opponent in A/M. Baylor got lit up to the tune of 55 points and OK St beat them in College Station.

Just looking for a little further info. Maybe I should buy out of my bet?

Thanks in advance. Like Clemson -4 and Arkansas -10 (current line).
               


   Something to think about for the future when your looking at games. Its not always a good idea to try to judge a game between two teams that are now different. What I mean is, as the college football season moves along teams change and your ability to stay with the change is important.

Its a long season. Oklahoma S.T and Baylor are both different teams now then they were 2,3, even 4 weeks ago.... take example G.T 


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #212
Quote Originally Posted by Fat_Bastard:

Newbie on here, Boom. I've been reading your thread for most of the season and wondered if I might bug you for some perspective...

What's your thoughts on Navy+20? I just don't see Notre Dame rallying anymore this year. I believe Kelly can coach, but I also believe he doesn't have the talent in place yet. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Keep killing it. BOL!

man thats a lot of points for a rivalry game
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #213
Quote Originally Posted by GoGoplata123:

What's up boom?? And the rest of you guys for that matter!!! Y'all are right it's, time to get that paper this week. We need some LOCKS!!!!! Anyone out there feel EXTREMELY confident on any certain games???
I feel pretty strong on AIR FORCE -31 this week against New Mexico. Has anyone actually watched the lobo's play a full game this year?? They are possibly one of the worst Division 1A teams I have ever seen before. Air force will score 50 points, I don't see the lobo 's scoring more than 10. Thoughts??? Comments.....
Somebody go out on a limb, put their credibility to the test and give me a Lock!!! Lol take care fellas!!


Whats up man... while agree with you that N. Mexico is really bad. teams like Air Force aren't in the business of scoring a ton of points.... They would just rather get up by a comfortable score and run the clock out...

Just a thought 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #214
Quote Originally Posted by naesiy:

Didn't Richt beat Florida in 07?  When they did that crazy celebration in the endzone?

yes...

here we go

I want insinuating that Richt hasn't ever beat Florida.  I m simply pointing out that Florida has owned him. This is a big rivalry game... and getting your ass kicked year in and year out is not good. I think this is the year to capitalize when Florida is struggling.


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by redsox5831:

Boom would you still consider Baylor at +14 or is the value now gone? Thanks
anything above 2 td's
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #216
Quote Originally Posted by burningsun72:

I was at the Clemson game and their offense looks as impressive as anyone in the country. I give credit to the coaches as much as the players. Yea, the defense is suspect at times, but we just keep winning. Tiger Nation is on fire. Like your huge bet on Clemson this week. Other teams have figured out GT and we won't be different. 45-27. GO TIGERS!!!
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #217
Quote Originally Posted by stevo1:

Hey Boom (Team ATS Rankings from prior week) 12-2 last 3 weeks

I've been following you and applying  the best ATS teams (square plays)but winners last 3 weeks,yes chalk but parlay to assist chalk

5 teams in top ATS that ranked on 10/1 went 3-1- (1(bye) loss G Tech on week 10/8
5 teams in top ATS that ranked on 10/8 went 5-0-0 on week 10/15
5 teams in top ATS that ranked on 10/15 went 4-1-0 ( loss Wisky) on week 10/22

This week10/22 top ranked ATS  that play on Sat 10/29 in your opinion who does not cover ATS,

Stanf 7-0-0
Alab  7-1-0,,,Off bye
Clem,7-1-0 you already have them as a win 
Kan St 6-1-0
Okla St 6-1-0

If past records are correct only one team should not cover (possibly)
who is it ???? 12 -2 ATS record of Top 5 ATS teams is pretty STRONG for last 3 weeks
thanks for your thoughts,
Always RESPECT your Insight,,
good work stevio

Gl to you this weekend
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 3490
Posted: #218
Boom- You considering anything tonight?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #219
Quote Originally Posted by TREE88:

GL this week Boomer

my man tree
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #220
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster:

I post by questioning other's integrity, honesty and reasoning for a certain pick at time's. Does this make me wrong? In some eye's, possibly. Lot's of people on this form feel threatened when other's question something posted by another. It doesn't take a mastermind to figure out most on this forum. It is more than a mistake to argue with another on a public forum such as this one and sadly Iv'e done so many times thinking something might sink in to other's. Shame on me...
You know I dont like you... you know I think your ability's are piss poor.... so why do you continue in my thread? I never open your threads.... ( lord knows it would be a waste of time )....

So for the last time... just go post somewhere else.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #221
Quote Originally Posted by THE-KID:

GL Boom. Clemson will cover this week. What makes more sense, a hater trying to guess when a hot team stops covering, or simply rolling with the hot team.  They have covered enough for me to ride it out.  If you don't like Clemson, don't bet them. I will be!
yeah man... Clemson is just flat out better than G.T
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #222
Quote Originally Posted by aggieaccountant:

Boom- You considering anything tonight?
man it is tempting... I do like Virginia. I doubt I will play anything tho.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 318
Posted: #223
GL BOOM 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #224
adding

Penn S.T  -5.5  2 units

Stanford  /  USC    Over 59.5   2 units



 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #225
Plays Thursday - Saturday


Baylor   +17   2 units

Arkansas   -10.5    2 units

Clemson   -4    5 units

UNC   -7  2 units

Boston College   +7.5    2 units

S. Miss   -9.5   2 units

Penn S.T  -5.5  2 units

Stanford  /  USC    Over 59.5   2 units

Oklahoma  /  Kansas S.T   Over 58.5   2 units
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.