All Forums | College Football

NCAA Week 2 ***** Fading me is bankroll suicide*****

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 61486
Posts: 309
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #26
Also, any thoughts on Oregon State this week ? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3072
Posted: #27
Bowling Green baby! Okie St Big!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 34003
Posted: #28

Big revenge game for Purdue also from the beating they took last year @ home to ND.

GL this week Train man!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 20749
Posted: #29

Bol this week buddy.

Week 1 is very tough to come out on the plus side.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 17
Posted: #30
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Arid_Torpor:

Wow do we see things the same way or what? I lean with four of your plays and four of your leans. And Pitt and Penn State. Only place I really lean against you is Arizona. I am a little scared of the Friday night special with Utah though. Utes are clearly better, but a Friday night rivalry road game has been a recipe for crazy the last couple years. Probably won't play it. BOL, train


Utah is really good. Friday night dogs are pretty scary, but I wont let that keep me from from a winner. Utes too big up front....I like Zona being at home and everyone seeing Ok St put up 84 while AZ struggled with Toledo......misconception week


AT
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by tiasman:

BOL Train in week 2  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by BoiseState25:

Like Utah as well.......but it's a tough spot. Arid pointed out the Friday night rivalry road game angle, and I'm going to throw in it's a look ahead spot with their real rival BYU on deck next week. Been burned more times than not laying the points in that situation. BL and always enjoy your writeups!


I hear ya on the friday game with lookahead, but gotta go with my gut.
BS25
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by TreyInventor:

Definately a lean on BG I think with all those starters they have coming back and playing how they did this week they could beat the piss out of Idaho. 

I like Penn State even tho I told myself I would be fading them this season. Honestly kinda thinkin about a 7.5 pt teaser  making BG 6.5 and Penn State 17.5. Sounds like that could be

You have faith in Clemsons defense? Their secondary was getting cooked by Auburns. A couple overthrown passes and one TD pass caught out of bounds almost kept Clemmy from covering. This game is in death valley tho I'll give em that but Im not quite sure I can lay $ TDs with them t this point. Tough lines this week IMO.  but hey what do I know I went 6-6 this weekend losing $4.00



Ball St ain't Auburn, especially in the trenches. I expect Clemson to put up 60 and give the fans a show. The defense will look much better this week by default.....

TI
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by buddygurt:

Like the purdue play, they catch ND coming back across the pond


That combined with a trip to East Lansing on deck.....the perfect sandwich spot.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by stiffler1705:

 Train, always much respect here. Always read your threads....

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 2096
Posted: #37
Let that Pitt line keep going up then jump on it. Hopefully it gets to 6.5.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by redbook1:

actually, pitt and maryland probably ARE that bad.


You may be correct sir !
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by Pecador:

I think -27 might be to much for Clemson. I'll wait it out to see weekend line.  Might play Ball St. @ this line. Kinda think Ball will score a few. If they can do 20 then tough cover for Clemson.

Tx. AM has great fans but lately hasn't been a lock. Not sure about Fla. after first game but Tx. AM has no games.

How do you feel about Georgia @ Mizz.?  Or,  @Ohio -21   N. MX.St.

Doc



Tex A&M should have been put with the leans, my bad. Just saw that. I havent played them yet.

If I play Mizzou, it will be 60% homer with 20% Richt fade with 20% road game for UGA

Lean N Mex at that # with Ohio coming off a big win (for them)



 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by QBUN:

cant wait for the ML DOG PARLAY!!!!


It will have its own thread.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #41
daddy/pot/lvl/hap
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

you think maryland can keep it within 2 TDs against temple???

temple blew maryland the fuck out last year in maryland...this year the stage shifts to temple



Its a lean simple because Maryland looks too easy to fade after their week one performance.....
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #43
UPDATE:

Tex A&M -2.5 is a lean, not a play (yet). Not that any of you really care, but just noticed I put it with the plays. Sorry. Havent played it yet simply because Florida fits into my misconception angle and A&M hasnt played a game yet.....



 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Orangemen44:

Leaning on Zona, A&M, and USC so far....but what can you tell me about MIZZ that will change my lean on GA ?  

GL this week 


I wouldnt try to talk you into a Mizz play. If I play it it will be for reasons stated above.

OSU/Wisc is a tough game. Wisc should have their legs under them now and the Beavs have yet to take a snap. May take the Badgers if I can get under a td, but most likely will leave it alone.

Orange
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by TREE88:

Bol this week buddy.

Week 1 is very tough to come out on the plus side.






Tree


wizer user
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54513
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by TurnstoneMoney:

Let that Pitt line keep going up then jump on it. Hopefully it gets to 6.5.





Add leans:

AF +21.5 & over (when it comes out)


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 200
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:



Tex A&M should have been put with the leans, my bad. Just saw that. I havent played them yet.

If I play Mizzou, it will be 60% homer with 20% Richt fade with 20% road game for UGA

Lean N Mex at that # with Ohio coming off a big win (for them)





Train you do realize that most of the Georgia players are still suspended, right?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

23-12 ytd (GT +7.5 pending)


Thanks all who stopped by in last weeks thread.

Fuck you haters. Yep "barrelinto", I'm calling you out. Go fuck yourself bitch.

Utah -7

Az St pk

USC -26

Iowa St +4

N Mex +37---r u serious..i know Texas struggled, but NM is just.... dreadfull year in and year out and mostly against big conf schools....  do u remember  akron

La Tech -3.5

Purdue +14.5----hope they put more of a  resistance than navy did

Clemson -27

Tex A&M -2.5


I will be on Pitt,Zona and Penn St, just waiting for the lines to go up.

Leans:

Vandy -3

Duke +14---yeah i will be thinking the same, after the poor piss  performance of stanford agains a shitty team, never the less, i think either this will be close....or the tree come out blasting...i wont touch this even with loaned money bol

Mizzou +3.5---yeah  UGA  looked like shiet against a crappy team, and missou looks like they are in to prove something, and they can upset big schools at home...... im in to this

BG -14

Miami +7

UCF +17.5---man.....i firmly beleive OSU will get better every week, i have a feeling  they will roll who ever they can roll

Auburn +3


Questions/comments? I'm all ears boys.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 1167
Posted: #49
With you on Purdue.

Was going to play Clemson but 27 seemed a little too much. Are you thinking that Ball St is just going down to collect their check and are already thinking about beating Indiana in week 3? That's how I see it but just don't like the -27.

USC -26. Cuse off a very tough loss. If Marrone gets the team motivated this week, he deserves a lifetime contract. USC tough to read...do they blow out teams for style points? Do they get a 3 TD lead and put in the backups?


-----------
Your leans...

Played against a couple of the leans & agree on a couple.

Leaning Vandy and Duke. Duke may finally be experienced enough to handle a trip to Stanford and be competitive. It has to start coming together for Cutcliffe. Duke can't get a better coach but they may be getting restless...


 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #50
train.... too many games....


 


GL bud
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.