All Forums | College Football

NCAA WEEK 3 **** Good chance I sweep the board****

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10024
Posts: 59
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by gmanusc2001:

Train 

Great call on the SC / MIZZ under play last week....


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 109
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by OurTake:

Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:

Memphis +3.5you reasoning for this one please ???
Memphis should have a pretty strong and efficient offense once it doesn't have to play in a hurricane.  This game might come down to the wire.  I trust Memphis offense more than Rosen and Bruins.

I have to pick UCLA and the points Memphis defense is terrible Rosen will pick them apart and UCLA has an athletic defense that will make a few plays against Memphis offense
Wiz
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by MaineRoad:

Good chance you sweep the board.
Duh. 


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #29

UK/SC O51

ND/BC U49.5

Memphis +3.5

Purdue/Mizzou U78.5

Miss St +7

SMU +19

La Tech +7

Stanford -8

Ole Miss -3.5

Texas +16



Add:


Flor/Tenn U49.5
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by alopez14325:

Im on a lot of the same games, I took Stanford, Memphis, SMU, and Ole Miss... If Ellingher is the starter for Texas, im probably going to take USC -15... He looked really bad against SJSU imo... he only completed about 50% of his passes against SJSU.  When you actually look at the game a majority of his passes were check downs to the Rb's...

I dont think their loss to Maryland was that bad.  I think it looked a lot worse because they were an 18 pt home favorite... Maryland recieved some votes for the preseason top 25, and they returned some superstars... This should be an interesting game either way
I think this line is based off things that have happened (Maryland beating TX and USC beating Stanford), not whats going to happen. The 2 things I think people are missing are 1) Maryland isnt that bad 2) Stanford isnt that good

I think Texas and USC are a lot closer than it appears, but having said that, USC at home should win the game....I am just betting its not a blow out....

Ive been wrong before. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by 1969USC:

Maryland beat Texas at Texas by 10.  USC is better on offense and defense than Maryland.  They will play Texas at home.  They just spanked a good Stanford team.  They are fired up.  

USC  -16
Thats not how I cap games brother. Usually doesnt end well. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by alopez14325:

Im on a lot of the same games, I took Stanford, Memphis, SMU, and Ole Miss... If Ellingher is the starter for Texas, im probably going to take USC -15... He looked really bad against SJSU imo... he only completed about 50% of his passes against SJSU.  When you actually look at the game a majority of his passes were check downs to the Rb's...

I dont think their loss to Maryland was that bad.  I think it looked a lot worse because they were an 18 pt home favorite... Maryland recieved some votes for the preseason top 25, and they returned some superstars... This should be an interesting game either way
Ive read your thoughts in a couple other thread...great stuff. 

Thanks for stopping by brother 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 22444
Posted: #33
Gettum bud. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Preism:

I would like to challenge you to your best 5 bets of weekend. Been reading board for a while but just started to post my picks. You down?
Pick any 5 and have a blast 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4793
Posted: #35
That PUR / MIZZ  UNDER looks very interesting Train


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #36
Add:

Utah/SJST U59.5



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 3087
Posted: #37
Memphis.. Yup.. 


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #38
Add:

Texas/USC U67.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3424
Posted: #39
GL Train, my guess is that you sweep this weekend. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by BigEarnie:

GL Train, my guess is that you sweep this weekend. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #41
Added a bit more to the Purdue/Mizzou under.....Mizzou defense should be fired up, but I expect the Purdue defense to play decent as well....


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 11658
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Add:

Texas/USC U67.5



Why didn't you tell me you scored some of the 'good stuff'?? 



You must have some 'inside info' on this one 










 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 11658
Posted: #43
Oh and btw I guarantee you don't sweep the weekend 













 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 64
Posted: #44
can we get a top 3 for old time sake?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7572
Posted: #45
Missouri / Boilermakers Under





 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1432
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Preism:

LSU wins against Mississippi state no doubt. They could win by just a touchdown but that's a close call.

LSU DC Dave Aranda stats against running qb's and Arden Key is back( Best  Defensive player in the nation)

2014 LSU vs Wisconsin:
Anthony Jennings: 9 carries, -2 yards

2014 Nebraska vs Wisconsin:
Tommy Armstrong: 20 carries, 17 yards

2014 Ohio State vs Wisconsin:
Cardale Jones: 8 carries, 9 yards

2014 Auburn vs Wisconsin:
Nick Marshall: 7 carries, 18 yards

2015 Maryland vs Wisconsin:
Perry Hillis 11 carries, -14 yards

2016 Mississippi State vs LSU:
Nick Fitzgerald: 13 carries, 13 yards

2016 Ole Miss vs LSU:
Chad Kelly: 12 carries, 56 yards

2016 Alabama vs LSU:
Jalen Hurts: 20 carries, 114 yards, 1 TD
(72 yards came on 3 carries, 42 yards on the other 17 carries)

2016 Texas A&M vs LSU:
Trevor Knight: 6 carries, 11 yards

2017 Louisville vs LSU:
Lamar Jackson: 26 carries, 33 yards


TOTAL:
132 carries
255 yards
1.93 yards per carry
1 TD

You could also add BYU had - 5 yds rushing in the LSU-BYU opener

pollockanesian
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1432
Posted: #47
I 've got the broom ready just in case lightning strikes
pollockanesian
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #48
Good stuff, train. BOL this week.      
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #49
Top 3

Mizzou under

Nd under

Smu + whatever
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54482
Posted: #50
Jose & cheeser 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.