NDD - yeah may end up reducing Nebraska play depending on outlook and health of Martinez and Paul, looks like letdown spot we'll see if players buy into what Pelini is saying or not
Nebraska coach Bo Pelini said tonight to forget all about what looms as an obvious story line heading into the Holiday Bowl --- whether the Cornhuskers will be ready for a rematch with the Washington Huskies.
Pelini spoke to the media tonight for the first time since the bowl matchup was announced and said, according to Husker Extra, that there is "no disappointment" about the Holiday Bowl matchup. "We're looking forward to playing the football game.'' He went on to say, when asked if it would be difficult to motivate the Cornhuskers, that "I don't care what people say. People are going to say whatever they want to say and I could care less about what people outside this building say."
adding
Navy +5
Navy 30 SD St 27....middies tough in bowls going 5-1 ATS since 2004, overall 5-1 ATS as dog last two seasons, similar AF attack moved ball well (300+ rushing) in earlier 27-25 loss to SD St, Navy one loss by more than 8 over couple seasons, SD St not extending margins against stronger teams, reports SD St offense timing based needs work after layoff
0
all -
NDD - yeah may end up reducing Nebraska play depending on outlook and health of Martinez and Paul, looks like letdown spot we'll see if players buy into what Pelini is saying or not
Nebraska coach Bo Pelini said tonight to forget all about what looms as an obvious story line heading into the Holiday Bowl --- whether the Cornhuskers will be ready for a rematch with the Washington Huskies.
Pelini spoke to the media tonight for the first time since the bowl matchup was announced and said, according to Husker Extra, that there is "no disappointment" about the Holiday Bowl matchup. "We're looking forward to playing the football game.'' He went on to say, when asked if it would be difficult to motivate the Cornhuskers, that "I don't care what people say. People are going to say whatever they want to say and I could care less about what people outside this building say."
adding
Navy +5
Navy 30 SD St 27....middies tough in bowls going 5-1 ATS since 2004, overall 5-1 ATS as dog last two seasons, similar AF attack moved ball well (300+ rushing) in earlier 27-25 loss to SD St, Navy one loss by more than 8 over couple seasons, SD St not extending margins against stronger teams, reports SD St offense timing based needs work after layoff
LSU 30 Tex A&M 20...A&M offense mostly contained against better defenses this year (Ark, Tex, Mizzou, etc) and LSU is there and more, if avoiding ridiculous Jefferson, Lee errors, Tigers pretty solid in bowls recently and will look to rebound losing last year
I love the LSU pick, but LSU won their bowl game last year against Georgia Tech 38-3.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
LSU 30 Tex A&M 20...A&M offense mostly contained against better defenses this year (Ark, Tex, Mizzou, etc) and LSU is there and more, if avoiding ridiculous Jefferson, Lee errors, Tigers pretty solid in bowls recently and will look to rebound losing last year
I love the LSU pick, but LSU won their bowl game last year against Georgia Tech 38-3.
Borrow money, max out ur credit cards, whatever, just put everything on this game. Auburn wins exactly as you predict...by at least 3 tds. Take Auburn and even parlay that shat with the OVER....I will switch it up a bit as Chip will get his...
BUT STILL Auburn 49-28.
Auburn - (anything under -20.5) 200 units
Over - (whatever is left that you can bet) 200 units
Loved and appreciate all u do...mu first year here but thanks.
EE
0
Quote Originally Posted by evilelvis:
NosDogg,
Borrow money, max out ur credit cards, whatever, just put everything on this game. Auburn wins exactly as you predict...by at least 3 tds. Take Auburn and even parlay that shat with the OVER....I will switch it up a bit as Chip will get his...
BUT STILL Auburn 49-28.
Auburn - (anything under -20.5) 200 units
Over - (whatever is left that you can bet) 200 units
Loved and appreciate all u do...mu first year here but thanks.
quantum - tend to agree on BYU lack of playmakers, UGA has enough with Green...and Ealey when he feels like playing and Murray not bad at 24-6, BOL on the bowls
GC - at least we're on LSU, BOL bowl season bud
thinking about small wager on Utah...not seeing how BSU is ready for LV bowl, Utah strong in bowls and could regroup after some rest although defense not up to normal yrs and blown out in last two against TCU
0
all
quantum - tend to agree on BYU lack of playmakers, UGA has enough with Green...and Ealey when he feels like playing and Murray not bad at 24-6, BOL on the bowls
GC - at least we're on LSU, BOL bowl season bud
thinking about small wager on Utah...not seeing how BSU is ready for LV bowl, Utah strong in bowls and could regroup after some rest although defense not up to normal yrs and blown out in last two against TCU
quantum - tend to agree on BYU lack of playmakers, UGA has enough with Green...and Ealey when he feels like playing and Murray not bad at 24-6, BOL on the bowls
GC - at least we're on LSU, BOL bowl season bud
thinking about small wager on Utah...not seeing how BSU is ready for LV bowl, Utah strong in bowls and could regroup after some rest although defense not up to normal yrs and blown out in last two against TCU
See you at the pay window bud.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
all
quantum - tend to agree on BYU lack of playmakers, UGA has enough with Green...and Ealey when he feels like playing and Murray not bad at 24-6, BOL on the bowls
GC - at least we're on LSU, BOL bowl season bud
thinking about small wager on Utah...not seeing how BSU is ready for LV bowl, Utah strong in bowls and could regroup after some rest although defense not up to normal yrs and blown out in last two against TCU
I really think Texas A and M is legit since the quarterback change. I know SEC this SEC that. Wonderful but the value I believe lies with A and M call me nuts but I think the SEC may have lost its luster. Auburn seems to be to legit and I think they will win. Anyway thats my two sense good luck buddy kill the bookie.
0
I really think Texas A and M is legit since the quarterback change. I know SEC this SEC that. Wonderful but the value I believe lies with A and M call me nuts but I think the SEC may have lost its luster. Auburn seems to be to legit and I think they will win. Anyway thats my two sense good luck buddy kill the bookie.
I really think Texas A and M is legit since the quarterback change. I know SEC this SEC that. Wonderful but the value I believe lies with A and M call me nuts but I think the SEC may have lost its luster. Auburn seems to be to legit and I think they will win. Anyway thats my two sense good luck buddy kill the bookie.
What makes you think A&M has value? Do you think they should be a 3+ point favorite in this game?
0
Quote Originally Posted by mtp104:
I really think Texas A and M is legit since the quarterback change. I know SEC this SEC that. Wonderful but the value I believe lies with A and M call me nuts but I think the SEC may have lost its luster. Auburn seems to be to legit and I think they will win. Anyway thats my two sense good luck buddy kill the bookie.
What makes you think A&M has value? Do you think they should be a 3+ point favorite in this game?
FCS going decent so far, taking shot for third straight week with....
Villanova -9.5 (-115) (0.75)....getting a little pricey now after hammering SFA and App St, and higher with EWU RB Jones (1800+ yds) being out, cats could pressure Mitchell into mistakes and offense is clicking, not much home field other than officials cheating...Villanova 45 E Wash 24
0
tree - same to you bud, hit'em hard
44 - thanks bro, BOL
mtp, SS
FCS going decent so far, taking shot for third straight week with....
Villanova -9.5 (-115) (0.75)....getting a little pricey now after hammering SFA and App St, and higher with EWU RB Jones (1800+ yds) being out, cats could pressure Mitchell into mistakes and offense is clicking, not much home field other than officials cheating...Villanova 45 E Wash 24
made the mistake of reading couple other threads besides 15-20 good reads
typical...dude has one good season and then rags on another poster for referring to previous....what a genius...this season he's so proud of is in the past just the same as any other season...long term business this season is no more or less important than any other...every season or week for that matter is in the 'past' so STFU with this I had a good season so my opinion matters more angle
same thread....more genius....that UCF (3.4/110) has a much better run defense than UGA (3.7/150)....fred sanford says you hear that Elizabeth I'm coming to join ya....if you look at every matchup and consider how the opposing teams run the ball things might not be as clear as pure stats indicate, good god no difference between rushing of Aub, GT, FL vs Rice, Marshall, actually it's good to have many think like this because it ensures many past and future years of profits, not to say that UCF won't cover or even win the game however their run defense is in no way dominant over bulldogs, makes little difference after the large money covers against Hawaii, Mich St and A&M win or lose at worst it's 3 of 4
0
made the mistake of reading couple other threads besides 15-20 good reads
typical...dude has one good season and then rags on another poster for referring to previous....what a genius...this season he's so proud of is in the past just the same as any other season...long term business this season is no more or less important than any other...every season or week for that matter is in the 'past' so STFU with this I had a good season so my opinion matters more angle
same thread....more genius....that UCF (3.4/110) has a much better run defense than UGA (3.7/150)....fred sanford says you hear that Elizabeth I'm coming to join ya....if you look at every matchup and consider how the opposing teams run the ball things might not be as clear as pure stats indicate, good god no difference between rushing of Aub, GT, FL vs Rice, Marshall, actually it's good to have many think like this because it ensures many past and future years of profits, not to say that UCF won't cover or even win the game however their run defense is in no way dominant over bulldogs, makes little difference after the large money covers against Hawaii, Mich St and A&M win or lose at worst it's 3 of 4
I live in Lincoln, rarely ever bet on Nebraska, but I have a buddy who is very close to the team. He told me Bo will be looking to send a message. This is a team we have dominated two times within 13 games.
Nebr doesn't need Taylor M to cover this spread. Unless he is 95% healthy it would be better to play Cody Green. Look at the Oklahoma game and Texas A&M. In both games Nebr loses the turnover battle and penaltys, yet both were 3 pt games.
This game will be very 1 sided. 48 - 17 nebr
Nebr -13.5 , big
Auburn -3 , big
Georgia -6.5 , big
Also...
Does anyone have any thoughts on UTEP +12 ? Looks like the most profitable play tomorrow.
Thoughts?
0
Quote Originally Posted by gcnmoo:
I live in Lincoln, rarely ever bet on Nebraska, but I have a buddy who is very close to the team. He told me Bo will be looking to send a message. This is a team we have dominated two times within 13 games.
Nebr doesn't need Taylor M to cover this spread. Unless he is 95% healthy it would be better to play Cody Green. Look at the Oklahoma game and Texas A&M. In both games Nebr loses the turnover battle and penaltys, yet both were 3 pt games.
This game will be very 1 sided. 48 - 17 nebr
Nebr -13.5 , big
Auburn -3 , big
Georgia -6.5 , big
Also...
Does anyone have any thoughts on UTEP +12 ? Looks like the most profitable play tomorrow.
I strongly suggest you not take Nebraska vs UW. Nebraska has no motivation to win this game. They are the better team on paper but UW is looking for revenge after getting blown out. UW will be up for game and Nebraska won't. I think the Huskers win by only 7-10 points.
And I also think Oregon will win national title outright. Pac-10 gets no respect but it was the best conference in nation in the Sag ratings. Auburn played a bunch of close games and Oregon played 1 vs Cal. Oregon's 2nd worst win was by 17 points. They will score at will vs Auburn. Oregon 41 Auburn 38
0
I strongly suggest you not take Nebraska vs UW. Nebraska has no motivation to win this game. They are the better team on paper but UW is looking for revenge after getting blown out. UW will be up for game and Nebraska won't. I think the Huskers win by only 7-10 points.
And I also think Oregon will win national title outright. Pac-10 gets no respect but it was the best conference in nation in the Sag ratings. Auburn played a bunch of close games and Oregon played 1 vs Cal. Oregon's 2nd worst win was by 17 points. They will score at will vs Auburn. Oregon 41 Auburn 38
apeterson, GC - appreciate the input, mixed signals on Nebraska won't be difficult to reduce later and at 14 maybe catch middle/push...not fan of Glenn so if he goes probably will reduce, went with BYU earlier for today's matchup, GL
adding small play (0.25)....NIU u30.5 (team) although it could happen having a tough time seeing them in 30's, seems inflated due to hanging 50+ on couple weak defenses
0
small, unc, wizer - BOL this bowl season fellas
apeterson, GC - appreciate the input, mixed signals on Nebraska won't be difficult to reduce later and at 14 maybe catch middle/push...not fan of Glenn so if he goes probably will reduce, went with BYU earlier for today's matchup, GL
adding small play (0.25)....NIU u30.5 (team) although it could happen having a tough time seeing them in 30's, seems inflated due to hanging 50+ on couple weak defenses
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.