All Forums | College Football

***ONE HUGE PLAY FOR SATURDAY COLLEGE FOOTBALL***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 12056
Posts: 92
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #51
Adding the rest of the plays:



UTEP +17  

Wakeforest +13

Vanderbilt +8.5

Texas -21

Miss St  ML




 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 451
Posted: #52
lmao. thank you to all the veteran gamblers with common sense. this line is just to fishy, and we all know when something looks to goog to be true it prolly is. i been on the bad side a few tomes and learned my lesson...........just like the utah line last week i wanted to bet sooooooooooooo bad but laid off because off the fishy line and vegas made a killing. people plz use your heads about this one. bol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 3147
Posted: #53

The IU score says it all...

What was the outcome of that game if IU had not lost their QB middle of the second quarter?

Score was what when that happened?  14-10...somebody was driving very well on ol' Wisky...until they lost their talented QB (relatively speaking)...and had to play someone who is very young and inexperienced...that kid felt like Garrett Gilbert against Bama last year...totally not expecting that.

I think Michigan wins SU, IMO.  If they can contain the ball...that is my only fear.  I know if I bet Michigan, I will throw the remote against the wall when they give up a small field to Wisky on a 1st down turn-over.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 187
Posted: #54
san diego state over utah is the play of the year and it comes this weekend
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 3392
Posted: #55
On Wisky -4... but BOL PTB
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by PlacinUnits:

The IU score says it all...

What was the outcome of that game if IU had not lost their QB middle of the second quarter?

Score was what when that happened?  14-10...somebody was driving very well on ol' Wisky...until they lost their talented QB (relatively speaking)...and had to play someone who is very young and inexperienced...that kid felt like Garrett Gilbert against Bama last year...totally not expecting that.

I think Michigan wins SU, IMO.  If they can contain the ball...that is my only fear.  I know if I bet Michigan, I will throw the remote against the wall when they give up a small field to Wisky on a 1st down turn-over.




I agree they have a good chance to win out right but like you said, Michigan will make us a few times during the game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 123
Posted: #57
PTP agree with you on this one. Wisconsin has trouble stopping deverse offences and Wisconsin might play up tight with the big ten title hanging in the balance!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 336
Posted: #58
Tired of getting beat with fishy or what was called trap lines.Was a time when that strategy worked well.Worked thru college taking calls in the 90s and you could count on one thing,if you heard the same team over and over whether straight,pars or teasers 75% of the time that team was toast.Just does not seem that way now and have record to prove it.Can only figure 24-7 media coverage and soft lines . Look no further than M.N.F.Philly could have been 10 and probably should of been.Football is a game won by coaching,defense,and the offensive line,not by flash players touted as unstoppable.Players,other than high scool players,can rarely take a gameover at least in football.That being said,betting against public not such a wise move neither is betting fishy lines,bet who you cap to be the best team and hope zebras,turnovers,and blown assignments do not cost you.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1794
Posted: #59

Looks good to me as well.

BOL

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by Bondsman:

Tired of getting beat with fishy or what was called trap lines.Was a time when that strategy worked well.Worked thru college taking calls in the 90s and you could count on one thing,if you heard the same team over and over whether straight,pars or teasers 75% of the time that team was toast.Just does not seem that way now and have record to prove it.Can only figure 24-7 media coverage and soft lines . Look no further than M.N.F.Philly could have been 10 and probably should of been.Football is a game won by coaching,defense,and the offensive line,not by flash players touted as unstoppable.Players,other than high scool players,can rarely take a gameover at least in football.That being said,betting against public not such a wise move neither is betting fishy lines,bet who you cap to be the best team and hope zebras,turnovers,and blown assignments do not cost you.



There is a place & time on when to go against a fishy line & this is one of those times.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 98
Posted: #61
oooovveerrrrr
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 5187
Posted: #62
Arkansas line is LOW in my eyes and stats, however I dont see how the Bulldogs upset Mallet and compay, they are way too talented on offense. I know they have LSU on deck, but they are good enough to win by a td
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 675
Posted: #63
Did you see Wisconsin's massacre last week? Michigan may as well be as good as Indiana. Their offense is so 1 dimensional. They lack defense if you watched the game against Illinois. Don't say they played defense either last week. Like Boom said in his thread, "Michigan didn't play defense, they played Purdue." Wisconsin wins by 10.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 675
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by PlacinUnits:

The IU score says it all...

What was the outcome of that game if IU had not lost their QB middle of the second quarter?

Score was what when that happened?  14-10...somebody was driving very well on ol' Wisky...until they lost their talented QB (relatively speaking)...and had to play someone who is very young and inexperienced...that kid felt like Garrett Gilbert against Bama last year...totally not expecting that.



You are retarded for thinking that game would have been closer. In terms of Indiana scoring more points, maybe it would have. Their defense still gave up 83, not the offense moron. I wish Wisky would've put up 100.

Primetime, I'll book your bet. I you win I'll pay you on Full Tilt. If I win, you can never post threads like this again.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:




There is a place & time on when to go against a fishy line & this is one of those times.


This IS NOT A FISHY LINE!!!!!!!!!!! you people kill me on this site. This line is spot on! If anything the line opened too high! To be honest... there was good value at +6.5 down to 5. But at +4 and with all this UM ML talk, this will be a slaughter of the masses.


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 675
Posted: #66
Just to throw it out there, all of this guys HUGE plays have been HUGE FLOPS. 

This is not the capper you want to be taking plays from.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10117
Posted: #67

Wisky...

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 748
Posted: #68
As someone that has made a great deal of money this year betting against UM, this line is fishy.  Not that it isn't tight based on the history that Wisconsin brings to the table in the Big House including 2 years ago when UM scored 20 points in the 4th quarter to win the game.  You also have the issue of UM looking ahead to OSU next week.

The issue really is that UM's defense blows and anyone that says there defense is playing better after citing to a game were the defense gave up 65 points has no credibility.  

If Purdue had any functioning quarterback that could complete a pass they would have won that game last week.  Instead, all they could do is run the ball or quarterback keeper types.  UM has enough talent in the front 7 to stop that type of offense.  But it is the ability to throw the ball that kills UM. Their secondary is young, slow and dumb.  If Wisconsin's QB can complete some passes they should win this game going away.

The other big issue you have is the choking dogs that Wisconsin is verse the choking dog LRod is when in tight spots.  Wisconsin typically chokes away a game every year and hasn't done it yet.  LRod does the same usually when his offense plays too fast and turns the ball over - it happened last week against Purdue.  happened against Iowa and MSU. Same thing happened when he was at WVU and Pat White and Slayton fumble the rock like it was a hot plate.  His offense requires small shifty QB but as the game goes on and he takes a pounding they tend to fumble the ball.

Saying that I think you have to play Wisconsin because they are head and shoulders a better team.  If tehy win you come back next week and bet against them in a great let down spot.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 3147
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by GoMuckYaSelf:



You are retarded for thinking that game would have been closer. In terms of Indiana scoring more points, maybe it would have. Their defense still gave up 83, not the offense moron. I wish Wisky would've put up 100.

Primetime, I'll book your bet. I you win I'll pay you on Full Tilt. If I win, you can never post threads like this again.

You are a low-life, internet tough guy.  Did you watch the game?  Or did you read a box score?  Do you know how many times Wisconsin started deep in IU territory?

128 posts and counting...

You may not agree with my opinion, and that is fair.  But your response to my own post is uncalled for.  You are a joke...

No one cares what you have to say...just keep at it tough guy.  Keep pounding those keys with all that bull shit.  I wish we could talk in person.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 675
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by PlacinUnits:


You are a low-life, internet tough guy.  Did you watch the game?  Or did you read a box score?  Do you know how many times Wisconsin started deep in IU territory?

128 posts and counting...

You may not agree with my opinion, and that is fair.  But your response to my own post is uncalled for.  You are a joke...

No one cares what you have to say...just keep at it tough guy.  Keep pounding those keys with all that bull shit.  I wish we could talk in person.


With all sincerity, my apologies man. I was heated from something at work, and I guess it just came out in that post. I was also annoyed by the creator of this thread. He post these threads as "Huge Plays" and it seems he has hit maybe 1 of the 7 or 8 he posted. This guy is losing "Huge Money". Threads like this annoy me instantly. If you check my threads I post multiple plays per week, and over 7 weeks, I am 36-17-1 on plays.

Now back to that Wisky game. I did watch it. Indiana just gave up after so long. Even with their starting QB in though, that game would have ended up 60'ish to maybe 30'something. I do believe losing the QB took the life out of IU, but you just can't quit in sports. Wisky is no joke this season, unfortunately that ugly ass blue and gold team 1 state north of us is a full on joke. They have zero defense and an offense that is more 1 dimensional than a 1600's painting on the wall of a museum. Wisconsin will rip them apart.

BOL to you man, and again . . . .  Sorry for the uncalled for rant. Just having one of those days.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by GoMuckYaSelf:



With all sincerity, my apologies man. I was heated from something at work, and I guess it just came out in that post. I was also annoyed by the creator of this thread. He post these threads as "Huge Plays" and it seems he has hit maybe 1 of the 7 or 8 he posted. This guy is losing "Huge Money". Threads like this annoy me instantly. If you check my threads I post multiple plays per week, and over 7 weeks, I am 36-17-1 on plays.

Now back to that Wisky game. I did watch it. Indiana just gave up after so long. Even with their starting QB in though, that game would have ended up 60'ish to maybe 30'something. I do believe losing the QB took the life out of IU, but you just can't quit in sports. Wisky is no joke this season, unfortunately that ugly ass blue and gold team 1 state north of us is a full on joke. They have zero defense and an offense that is more 1 dimensional than a 1600's painting on the wall of a museum. Wisconsin will rip them apart.

BOL to you man, and again . . . .  Sorry for the uncalled for rant. Just having one of those days.




I did hit 4 of my last 6 HUGE plays   and my college GOY on Boise St 2 weeks ago

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 1579
Posted: #72

Wisky by 10 and a cover!

-Sizz

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 3147
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by GoMuckYaSelf:



With all sincerity, my apologies man. I was heated from something at work, and I guess it just came out in that post. I was also annoyed by the creator of this thread. He post these threads as "Huge Plays" and it seems he has hit maybe 1 of the 7 or 8 he posted. This guy is losing "Huge Money". Threads like this annoy me instantly. If you check my threads I post multiple plays per week, and over 7 weeks, I am 36-17-1 on plays.

Now back to that Wisky game. I did watch it. Indiana just gave up after so long. Even with their starting QB in though, that game would have ended up 60'ish to maybe 30'something. I do believe losing the QB took the life out of IU, but you just can't quit in sports. Wisky is no joke this season, unfortunately that ugly ass blue and gold team 1 state north of us is a full on joke. They have zero defense and an offense that is more 1 dimensional than a 1600's painting on the wall of a museum. Wisconsin will rip them apart.

BOL to you man, and again . . . .  Sorry for the uncalled for rant. Just having one of those days.

Thank you.  Good luck on your plays - I saw your games and I wanted to hate them b/c of your comments but I liked your card.

  


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 31214
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:





I did hit 4 of my last 6 HUGE plays   and my college GOY on Boise St 2 weeks ago





 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 675
Posted: #75
You lost Temple, my boys at OU won that game. I had insider info that Boo was starting for sure 100%. My friend is a wide receiver down there, we were at Courtside Pizza when Boo got into the fight.

You lost money on juice on the MNF game going 1-1.

You lost huge on the 2nd half Colts play in week 9.

You lost Buffalo -3 last Friday losing money to juice w/ Boise St. covering putting you 1-1.

Last Saturday you went 4-3-1.

All of these added up make you 6-6-1.

I'm just saying, I don't see 4 huge wins here. You don't post how many units per game or anything. Just HUGE! HUGE! HUGE! I just see you losing huge amounts of juice. It takes over 60% to win, and I haven't found that in all of your posts.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.