All Forums | College Football

SATURDAYS SHARPS$$$$$$$

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 98694
Posts: 680
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 4861
Posted: #226
Where is that guy who called me a Rodeo Clown for suggesting a new thread due to superstition?

Would everyone not agree that this thread's creation has yielded far more profitable results?  Let's keep it up guys (and girls).
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 503
Posted: #227
Quote Originally Posted by poolman11:

NICE UAB

 

SO MUCH FOR RAS TOUT SERVICE THAT MOVES LINES TYPICAL TOUT SERVICE SOLD THIER CLIENTS DOWN THE RIVER



Look I'll be the first to agree that tout services are fraud, but they do have a good track record. I don't think you can base things on one game buddy.  I mean you were raving about AF and buying points, but obviously that didn't work out to well for ya.  Point is no one is an expert even if they claim to be.  Fact is everyone has good and bad runs, if there was someone out there that could consistently hit 65% or better the books would shut down and go out of biz.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 63
Posted: #228
LA - don't JINX it....lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 34
Posted: #229
Hey LA whats your take on NO vs Charlotte game tonight? Spread opened up at 2, a lot of people on Charlotte and went up to 3? Im liking NO here, any insight? 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 84
Posted: #230
Thank you Sir Poolio.  UAB OAK   
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 903
Posted: #231
Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches:

Where is that guy who called me a Rodeo Clown for suggesting a new thread due to superstition?

Would everyone not agree that this thread's creation has yielded far more profitable results?  Let's keep it up guys (and girls).

I am right here. Sorry for the rude comment, just not one for superstitions. Thank you for your due diligence. I hope you don't hold any animosity towards my juvenile comments. Let's be adults and move on. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2702
Posted: #232
this is where we hold hands and sing, "Kumbaya" 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #233

REALLY BROTHER RAVING OVER AIR FORCE  IF I THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING TO RAVE ABOUT ID A BET MORE THEN A WHOPPING 2,U ON IT   MONEY TALKS B,S WALKS  SEE WHERE MY MONEYS @ BEFORE YOU COME IN HERE WITH THAT  BUDDY  

UAB 8,U  1,U   OAK 4,U ,1,U  ID SAY THEM WERE WHERE MY MONIES AT   GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR SERVICE BUDDY ID RATHER NOT GET INTO A PISSING MATCH   BUT IVE NEVER RAVED ABOUT AIR FORCE REALLY 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 42
Posted: #234
Quote Originally Posted by jsguofo:



Look I'll be the first to agree that tout services are fraud, but they do have a good track record. I don't think you can base things on one game buddy.  I mean you were raving about AF and buying points, but obviously that didn't work out to well for ya.  Point is no one is an expert even if they claim to be.  Fact is everyone has good and bad runs, if there was someone out there that could consistently hit 65% or better the books would shut down and go out of biz.


RAS and some others can move lines up to 4 points.  If you aren't a subscriber you actually fare better waiting for the move and fading.  I made a killing in NCAA's 2 years ago on the RAS fade.  Not knocking him, just saying Vegas sets odds sharp and if they move 4 points you may have an advantage with the fade....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #235

UT ARLINGTON +2

 

130/100

5,U

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 4861
Posted: #236
Quote Originally Posted by Vapor1136:

Hey LA whats your take on NO vs Charlotte game tonight? Spread opened up at 2, a lot of people on Charlotte and went up to 3? Im liking NO here, any insight? 

Yeah, SERIOUSLY UGLY GAME.  I warn people most of the time to stay away from these types of affairs in the NBA, CBB is a bit different.  There are so many variables in the NBA and the bench players are all capable of scoring so when two ugly teams square off its sort of hard to predict.  

That being said, NO played an OT win last night and looked pretty good.  I have to say, that since they have gotten their main team playing they are starting to gel a bit.  The Bobcats on the other hand are at home and you have to ask yourself at what point will they win again.  Defensively they are not horrible at home but are miserable on the road.  

But I think that NO is the right side here as they just have more talent.  Both teams are young but Vasquez has been incredible at the point and Anderson is still playing at a high level.  Charlotte not only loses, they don't cover when they lose and NO has fared quite well vs. the Bobcats in the past.

Like i said, personally i would stay away as both teams have been used to losing and this game will probably stay UNDER the total and be ugly.  Gun to my head, i would take NO.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #237

TEXAS SAN ANTONIO +4

130/100

 

5,U

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #238

SOUTH ALABAMA -2

 

130/100

 

10,U

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #239
Love UT arlington pick Pool!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1962
Posted: #240
help me out poolio whos ut playing?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 34
Posted: #241
Thanks LA I appreciate it, ASU looking good right now
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 903
Posted: #242
Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches:


Yeah, SERIOUSLY UGLY GAME.  I warn people most of the time to stay away from these types of affairs in the NBA, CBB is a bit different.  There are so many variables in the NBA and the bench players are all capable of scoring so when two ugly teams square off its sort of hard to predict.  

That being said, NO played an OT win last night and looked pretty good.  I have to say, that since they have gotten their main team playing they are starting to gel a bit.  The Bobcats on the other hand are at home and you have to ask yourself at what point will they win again.  Defensively they are not horrible at home but are miserable on the road.  

But I think that NO is the right side here as they just have more talent.  Both teams are young but Vasquez has been incredible at the point and Anderson is still playing at a high level.  Charlotte not only loses, they don't cover when they lose and NO has fared quite well vs. the Bobcats in the past.

Like i said, personally i would stay away as both teams have been used to losing and this game will probably stay UNDER the total and be ugly.  Gun to my head, i would take NO.

The Whorenots lost to Toronto last night in OT.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2702
Posted: #243
[Quote: Originally Posted by poolman11]

SOUTH ALABAMA -2

 

130/100

 

10,U

10 UNITS,,,,YOUZEEEE   let's go Jaguars!!!!  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 325
Posted: #244
sorry if its obvious to everyone else, new to this thread . . . but is South Alabama -2 for 1H? thanks
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 1501
Posted: #245
IM SO MAD RIGHT NOW MY BOOK HAD A TYPO ON MY UAB BET SOME THEY VOIDED MY BET AND GAVE ME BACK MY MONEY THEY HAD NOTHWESTERN INSTEAD OF NORTHEASTERN NO INSTEAD OF JUST FIXING THE PROBLEM THEY JUST VOIDED MY BET
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2702
Posted: #246
it's -3.5 for the whole game at my book, miller 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 340
Posted: #247
Miller, FG
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 503
Posted: #248
Quote Originally Posted by poolman11:

REALLY BROTHER RAVING OVER AIR FORCE  IF I THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING TO RAVE ABOUT ID A BET MORE THEN A WHOPPING 2,U ON IT   MONEY TALKS B,S WALKS  SEE WHERE MY MONEYS @ BEFORE YOU COME IN HERE WITH THAT  BUDDY  

UAB 8,U  1,U   OAK 4,U ,1,U  ID SAY THEM WERE WHERE MY MONIES AT   GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR SERVICE BUDDY ID RATHER NOT GET INTO A PISSING MATCH   BUT IVE NEVER RAVED ABOUT AIR FORCE REALLY 



Fair enough and for the record I don't use any such service.  Someone asked who RAS was and I simply answered the question.  Not ragging on your plays, just saying when you can get a line on a football game at -2 for -110 there is no point really doing a ML at -130 and paying all that extra juice.  2 is not a critical number in football.  Any bookie will tell you the same thing.  Anyway, no need for a pissing match you are right.  It's all about winning, we all want to win and wish each other well. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 199
Posted: #249
LA -  U see any value in BELMONT and Butler on the road with low lines.  I see both easily taking care of business.? Both teams outmatch the oppenents. Thoughts?.    Congrats with new callsign, and I went with over and put in a tease.  Any other overall thoughts on anything is always a plus. THANKS again.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2013
Posted: #250
Quote Originally Posted by alcien:

IM SO MAD RIGHT NOW MY BOOK HAD A TYPO ON MY UAB BET SOME THEY VOIDED MY BET AND GAVE ME BACK MY MONEY THEY HAD NOTHWESTERN INSTEAD OF NORTHEASTERN NO INSTEAD OF JUST FIXING THE PROBLEM THEY JUST VOIDED MY BET


Wow... That is some BULLSH*T!!! I'd be so pissed..
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.