Sooooo, you are talking to the "kid" (yeah, 40 something years old now) that in about 6th grade had a cork board with a map of the US with every NAIA, Div. II school in the nation located on the map in case dad's team were to play a team from Dickinson, ND, Greenville, IL, or Westminster PA in the playoffs. Some of those NAIA schools are now currently playing at NCAA D2/D3 level.
.............
Oh boy, high school teams in your area would blow the doors off of Post, but both teams are bad by "good" D2 standards even if one is favored by 28 points. ....... just taking this opportunity to get on my soap box that the D2 playoff format by geography is flawed in terms of who the best teams are and it's unfair to teams in my area.
2023 playoff bracket example:
Kutztown wins their region and makes the National semi-finals. I believe that Kutztown is from the same region that Post and Assumption would represent if they made the playoffs. Kutztown lost in that semifinal round to Colorado School of Mines 35-7. Colorado School of Mines advances to the National Championship game and then they lose 38-7 to a team (Harding) from easily the best region. The box score for that National Championship game was that Harding only needed to attempt 2 passes all game. They ran for 504 yards on 57 carries! Harding's two games prior to that just to come out of their very strong region were a 35-34 win over Central Missouri in the round of 16, and a 7-6 win over Grand Valley State in the quarterfinals. ..... Two top 5 power rated teams in GVSU and Ferris State had to play each other in the very first round of the playoff bracket. It's a bad setup. It would be like putting all MAC teams in one region and all SEC teams in another region, and each region automatically gets a team in the final 4 (sound familiar ACC??.....how many years until that changes, 1 or 2?) Anyway, I digress and then digress again.
No play on Post vs. Assumption (yet)
0
@bookieassassin
Sooooo, you are talking to the "kid" (yeah, 40 something years old now) that in about 6th grade had a cork board with a map of the US with every NAIA, Div. II school in the nation located on the map in case dad's team were to play a team from Dickinson, ND, Greenville, IL, or Westminster PA in the playoffs. Some of those NAIA schools are now currently playing at NCAA D2/D3 level.
.............
Oh boy, high school teams in your area would blow the doors off of Post, but both teams are bad by "good" D2 standards even if one is favored by 28 points. ....... just taking this opportunity to get on my soap box that the D2 playoff format by geography is flawed in terms of who the best teams are and it's unfair to teams in my area.
2023 playoff bracket example:
Kutztown wins their region and makes the National semi-finals. I believe that Kutztown is from the same region that Post and Assumption would represent if they made the playoffs. Kutztown lost in that semifinal round to Colorado School of Mines 35-7. Colorado School of Mines advances to the National Championship game and then they lose 38-7 to a team (Harding) from easily the best region. The box score for that National Championship game was that Harding only needed to attempt 2 passes all game. They ran for 504 yards on 57 carries! Harding's two games prior to that just to come out of their very strong region were a 35-34 win over Central Missouri in the round of 16, and a 7-6 win over Grand Valley State in the quarterfinals. ..... Two top 5 power rated teams in GVSU and Ferris State had to play each other in the very first round of the playoff bracket. It's a bad setup. It would be like putting all MAC teams in one region and all SEC teams in another region, and each region automatically gets a team in the final 4 (sound familiar ACC??.....how many years until that changes, 1 or 2?) Anyway, I digress and then digress again.
Sorry, kinda misstated that at the end there about the ACC. I just meant the top 4 seeding, not the full bracket. I still think the top 4 seeding gets revised in a year or two.
Although 1st round home games at a Big Ten or SEC school will be fun while it lasts.
0
Sorry, kinda misstated that at the end there about the ACC. I just meant the top 4 seeding, not the full bracket. I still think the top 4 seeding gets revised in a year or two.
Although 1st round home games at a Big Ten or SEC school will be fun while it lasts.
and hooooly smokes if spots matter at all then Rutgers should walk off w this one 28-zip .. MASSIVE home game for Schiano and woah buddy short week friday night sure thing raucaus sellout, wash gettin the long easterly travel, a late first real roadie, a couple fairly tough games heading into this one a Natty rematch on deck and a Rutgers team and fan base that hasn't been this pumped since that big Louisville game .. idk what Rutgers roster situation is but if Schiano is worth a salt grain he'd have the 2nd squad blowin the friggin doors off these guys with a table setup like this one .. we'llllll seeeeee ..
Good luck this week buddy!
1
Good luck TD ..
With you on Minny, Wash St ..
and hooooly smokes if spots matter at all then Rutgers should walk off w this one 28-zip .. MASSIVE home game for Schiano and woah buddy short week friday night sure thing raucaus sellout, wash gettin the long easterly travel, a late first real roadie, a couple fairly tough games heading into this one a Natty rematch on deck and a Rutgers team and fan base that hasn't been this pumped since that big Louisville game .. idk what Rutgers roster situation is but if Schiano is worth a salt grain he'd have the 2nd squad blowin the friggin doors off these guys with a table setup like this one .. we'llllll seeeeee ..
I wish it was a typo. .... I took the 3am opener at FD or whatever time it was. I actually added a little at U45.5 this afternoon but haven't had a chance to post. Then I just cashed that out for a full return and added U46.5 -110 instead (BOL). Washington is an Under team to me the way they're playing so far this season. Hope it's a rock fight type game, but I am feeling a little sheepish about taking such a bad number. Hopefully the plays both win or both lose and I'm good with that. Good luck this week!
1
@JoseAlonso787
I wish it was a typo. .... I took the 3am opener at FD or whatever time it was. I actually added a little at U45.5 this afternoon but haven't had a chance to post. Then I just cashed that out for a full return and added U46.5 -110 instead (BOL). Washington is an Under team to me the way they're playing so far this season. Hope it's a rock fight type game, but I am feeling a little sheepish about taking such a bad number. Hopefully the plays both win or both lose and I'm good with that. Good luck this week!
Awesome yeah that game POPPED off the page when I was looking at the schedule pre-ssn like woaaaahhh nellie that feels like a legit loss for UW and at least in the SP+ math world this was lookin to be a pretty likely win .. unfortunately there's been quite a bit of line move from pre-ssn expectations but in fairness I think its pretty well deserved .. Rutgers totally dismantled VT at home and but for some questionable coaching calls .. like the friggin 50+ yard Field goal their guy has no shot to make .. Rutgers shoulda walked off w that one real easy .. but yeah this isin't as hyped of an opponent as the Ville game but crowd won't care .. blackout Friday night place will be rockin like it was almost 2 decades ago ..
1
@Brooklyncapper
Awesome yeah that game POPPED off the page when I was looking at the schedule pre-ssn like woaaaahhh nellie that feels like a legit loss for UW and at least in the SP+ math world this was lookin to be a pretty likely win .. unfortunately there's been quite a bit of line move from pre-ssn expectations but in fairness I think its pretty well deserved .. Rutgers totally dismantled VT at home and but for some questionable coaching calls .. like the friggin 50+ yard Field goal their guy has no shot to make .. Rutgers shoulda walked off w that one real easy .. but yeah this isin't as hyped of an opponent as the Ville game but crowd won't care .. blackout Friday night place will be rockin like it was almost 2 decades ago ..
Here's one more for you boys.....one not good team, and one terrible team. I'll take the struggling Rice Owls to get right here against lowly Charlotte.
Week 5:
Washington / Rutgers Under 42.5 -110 (1u) & Under 46.5 -110 (0.3u) -- (1.3u combined)
Utah -9.5 -112 (1u)
Air Force / Wyoming Under 36.5 -105 & -110 (combined 1u)
Added: Rice -6.5 -110 (1u)
Washington State +7.5 -105 (0.75u)
Northern Illinois +11.5 -110 (0.75u)
Kentucky +18.5 -105 (0.75u)
Minnesota +12.5 -110 (0.5u)
UNLV -3 -110 (0.5u)
East Carolina -3 -110 (0.5u)
Eastern Michigan -13.5 -115 (0.5u)
Georgia ML -120 (0.3u)
1
Here's one more for you boys.....one not good team, and one terrible team. I'll take the struggling Rice Owls to get right here against lowly Charlotte.
Week 5:
Washington / Rutgers Under 42.5 -110 (1u) & Under 46.5 -110 (0.3u) -- (1.3u combined)
Utah -9.5 -112 (1u)
Air Force / Wyoming Under 36.5 -105 & -110 (combined 1u)
Well I’m not thinking this should be my largest play, but so far it is. Kinda like last week if I’m not careful; I went 16-12 on posted plays but lost on $ because the larger plays didn’t do as well. Anyway, still Under here to me especially if 46.5 is your first action on this total. Good luck this week.
0
@JudgeBaylor
Well I’m not thinking this should be my largest play, but so far it is. Kinda like last week if I’m not careful; I went 16-12 on posted plays but lost on $ because the larger plays didn’t do as well. Anyway, still Under here to me especially if 46.5 is your first action on this total. Good luck this week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.