All Forums | College Football

Texas vs TT - Refs are corrupt! lol

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1798
Posts: 27
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #1
Not much else to say after that last overturn of the grounding call vs TT.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #2
This game, as in pretty much all CFB games, is scripted.  I called an INT there, now here comes a FG by TT for OT...then Texas wins by 7 to make it a push for Vegas. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 8381
Posted: #3
Texas = Public bloodbath 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3141
Posted: #4
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by KingRGIII:

Texas = Public bloodbath 

Yep, I took it early at -7, once the line went up to 8, I knew I was screwed. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 1308
Posted: #6
Texas blows plain and simple. Giving up that game in this manner is an abomination
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by bjsteel34:

This game, as in pretty much all CFB games, is scripted.  I called an INT there, now here comes a FG by TT for OT...then Texas wins by 7 to make it a push for Vegas. 

Oh well, so much for OT, the Texas DB conveniently falls down to allow a TD.  Now no way Texas covers or pushes, Vegas/Books wins big on this game, go figure.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2015
Posts: 1659
Posted: #8
I gotta stay away from these games. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 1186
Posted: #9
How in the F do you turn the ball over with 2 minutes left and you are in FG range.  

M-F'ing 5k parlay blown because Texas can't hold a 10 point lead at home.  

F me
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 1308
Posted: #10
Game was not fixed  texas just has no offense. Pissed that when they reviewed a play right when Texas ran a play and got in the end zone and then they settled for a FG. Those 4pts made a huge differerence. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 45781
Posted: #11
It was not an intentional grounding...If the ball gets close to the line of scrimmage they give it to the QB as an incomplete pass.  It was right at the marker....It needs to be way obvious.....TT Defense won the game.  Never thought I would say that....
Mayweather bet 450000 on
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:

It was not an intentional grounding...If the ball gets close to the line of scrimmage they give it to the QB as an incomplete pass.  It was right at the marker....It needs to be way obvious.....TT Defense won the game.  Never thought I would say that....

You are either freakin' high or bet TT, that was a full yard behind the line of scrimmage...and since when does it have to be "close" to the line of scrimmage?  The TT QB was turning backward and just tossed it out of bounds, that was the definition of grounding!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #13
TT needed a win to become bowl eligible, should have seen this shiat coming...completely bogus, and for those that don't think these games are fixed need to get there head out of there arse!    
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 45781
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by bjsteel34:


You are either freakin' high or bet TT, that was a full yard behind the line of scrimmage...and since when does it have to be "close" to the line of scrimmage?  The TT QB was turning backward and just tossed it out of bounds, that was the definition of grounding!

...."It was a full yard behind the line of scrimmage"......
Mayweather bet 450000 on
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:


...."It was a full yard behind the line of scrimmage"......

Did you watch the game or see the play?  The announcers and the in-booth replay official agreed it was intentional grounding, not really even close. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 44
Posted: #16
The ball hit something out of bounds and was close to the line.  Texas fuked up by not running on 3rd and 2 driving in Tech territory with them having 1 TO left

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Shvartz3232:

The ball hit something out of bounds and was close to the line.  Texas fuked up by not running on 3rd and 2 driving in Tech territory with them having 1 TO left


Well, they called it intentional grounding (and if you saw the play, it was intentional grounding), and this is not reviewable...then what happened?  The call came down from above saying to overturn it?  Come on, man! 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 5028
Posted: #18
kingsburys a legend dont hate 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 1754
Posted: #19

Funny how only losers cry fix, never hear winners say that.

If you had Texas, I'm gonna give you some cold hard truth: you need help. I had TTU today up on my blog, went 4-1 on the day only losers being UCF, and I swept the board on Turkey Day too. If you want to have a look its all free at phillybrownsports dot wordpress dot com, tomorrow's card looks good I'll have picks up for NCAAF soon.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 44
Posted: #20
Official on the field told the ref the ball got back to the line.  Nothing was done from above 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Shvartz3232:

Official on the field told the ref the ball got back to the line.  Nothing was done from above 

The officials discussed on the field prior to the intentional grounding call, it wasn't called initially.  So why didn't the official say it then?  Why wait until after the ref made the call?  And no way the ball got back to the line, not close.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by PhillyBrown:

Funny how only losers cry fix, never hear winners say that.

If you had Texas, I'm gonna give you some cold hard truth: you need help. I had TTU today up on my blog, went 4-1 on the day only losers being UCF, and I swept the board on Turkey Day too. If you want to have a look its all free at phillybrownsports dot wordpress dot com, tomorrow's card looks good I'll have picks up for NCAAF soon.


"Funny how only losers cry fix, never hear winners say that."

Yeah ,right, after this comment, F-U!  Take your website and shove it clown. Not the best way to promote you site! 


 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 5028
Posted: #23
bjsteel youre crying of refs bs is assanine. tech didnt even score on that drive. whats your point? did u see the targeting call not called on texas in the red zone when tech got the td?so i dont get what youre trying to point out
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 1268
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by EuroPro:

bjsteel youre crying of refs bs is assanine. tech didnt even score on that drive. whats your point? did u see the targeting call not called on texas in the red zone when tech got the td?so i dont get what youre trying to point out

Not sure what you are talking about, but it went from TT 2nd and 17 to 2nd and 10 after the reversal...TT went on to convert, and they did convert and eventually score if memory serves.  But either way, it was a bogus call.  Do get my point yet?
 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 5028
Posted: #25
[Quote: Originally Posted by bjsteel34]

Not sure what you are talking about, but it went from TT 2nd and 17 to 2nd and 10 after the reversal...TT went on to convert, and they did convert and eventually score if memory serves.  But either way, it was a bogus call.  Do get my point yet?
[/Quote

thats shot it was a 7 yard penalty lol then a 50 yard bomb. his pas for int grounding hit the stick, it made the line of scrimmage
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.