This is the type of stuff that…

Makes people question the integrity of the NFL. 

Why go for 2 there to go up 12 when you can just go up 11 like 99% of coaches USED TO DO. So many fishy and weird decisions by coaches and referees in the past decade or so.. ironically starting at about the same time that sports betting became mainstream.

Worked for my I have Cleveland +3.5 so I’m complaining. Just wondering. Did they really need to make it 12 so the Steelers can’t score a TD, go for 2, and then kick a FG to tie the game? Or so that’s a heck of a lot of forward thinking.  

This is the college football forum?  Seriously, how are ya’ll this tanked?

@P33PGame

 Wrong forum, but i mean they are a 2-8 team in a wacky snow game trying to win and keep jobs and reduce chance of a tie, not really fishy at all

In the 4th Quarter, you ABSOLUTELY go for 2 there (I as also shocked that a coach actually did it).

Being up by 12 instead of 10/11 is a monumental advantage, whatever the final outcome.

The cost if you DON'T convert the 2-pt conversion is negligible, 10 & 11 are virtually the same.

And by the way....it's not like Cleveland was -10.5...so whats so fishy about going for two ?......winning by 11 or 12 doesn't affect the spread

@carloscipper

  It does if you have Cleveland over 17.5 TT.  Which by the way I did have.  LFG!!!

@P33PGame

 i mean the team's 2-6.  Even if they lost, everyone wouldve said that was smart bc they're getting a good draft position.  Dont think the game really came down to we must do everything right bc we need it.