Another profitable day yesterday hitting all the biggest. so far only 1 day of none profitable wagering in mlb if i remember it correctly. Good thing small ball is here. ok…… first play banger coming….. note: 9 straight winners ats at one point yesterday, 6 nba 2 mlbs and 1 ncaab. first play bangers in mlb in the last 5 days 5 0. Ok………
until….. phx suns phuck it up and i stopped wagering. Good decision.
Quote Originally Posted by Logic123:
Rodon today?
we’l see about that… lets wait for the confirmation in awhile… Bol
0
Quote Originally Posted by Miracling2:
Another profitable day yesterday hitting all the biggest. so far only 1 day of none profitable wagering in mlb if i remember it correctly. Good thing small ball is here. ok…… first play banger coming….. note: 9 straight winners ats at one point yesterday, 6 nba 2 mlbs and 1 ncaab. first play bangers in mlb in the last 5 days 5 0. Ok………
until….. phx suns phuck it up and i stopped wagering. Good decision.
Quote Originally Posted by Logic123:
Rodon today?
we’l see about that… lets wait for the confirmation in awhile… Bol
So far we got a spoiled brat for overs game that would be the yankees game… hitting 7/8 overs in their last 8. And a whooping 8/8 in f5 overs, depends on your line in their 2nd game vs arizona where it went 4 for a push or 3.5 for a win.
Today we got rodon vs mize, so far the lowest game runs for yankees was when rodon started, 4 2 and 3 4, those the only TWO UNDERS so far in yankees game this season.
on the other hand we got the tigers pitcher today, mize, who went amazing in his first start, didnt give up any run, 1 hit only, in 5 innings pitched last april 1, almost lights out performance so i checked if they are fooling us because of the date, what the heck it was a fact.
see the math?
I think we need now an extensive formula and get the right equation to get an estimate on how runs will do in f5 and full game.
Do you think It will be an easy task ? now that we know what’s infront of us with regards to the pitching category?
but the level of difficulty will double as it will inlvolved TWO places, f5 and full game.
do you think f5 or full game is more logical to bet?
Hmmmnnnnnn……. Is it time for a goy and don’t waste the opportunity? Now that the public still banging the overs after yankees went 7/8 and 8/8 in fg f5 respectively.
let’s see the numbers…
Shall we follow the trend of yankees game OVERS?
or
be more specific and calculated in pitching category that says UNDER ?
How about the lined up and rotation offensively do i need to dissect it and drop it here?
then i say il be a spoiler of a good movie if i do that.
Ok………….
1
@Logic123
So far we got a spoiled brat for overs game that would be the yankees game… hitting 7/8 overs in their last 8. And a whooping 8/8 in f5 overs, depends on your line in their 2nd game vs arizona where it went 4 for a push or 3.5 for a win.
Today we got rodon vs mize, so far the lowest game runs for yankees was when rodon started, 4 2 and 3 4, those the only TWO UNDERS so far in yankees game this season.
on the other hand we got the tigers pitcher today, mize, who went amazing in his first start, didnt give up any run, 1 hit only, in 5 innings pitched last april 1, almost lights out performance so i checked if they are fooling us because of the date, what the heck it was a fact.
see the math?
I think we need now an extensive formula and get the right equation to get an estimate on how runs will do in f5 and full game.
Do you think It will be an easy task ? now that we know what’s infront of us with regards to the pitching category?
but the level of difficulty will double as it will inlvolved TWO places, f5 and full game.
do you think f5 or full game is more logical to bet?
Hmmmnnnnnn……. Is it time for a goy and don’t waste the opportunity? Now that the public still banging the overs after yankees went 7/8 and 8/8 in fg f5 respectively.
let’s see the numbers…
Shall we follow the trend of yankees game OVERS?
or
be more specific and calculated in pitching category that says UNDER ?
How about the lined up and rotation offensively do i need to dissect it and drop it here?
then i say il be a spoiler of a good movie if i do that.
With regards choosing sides, very evidently yankees will be in a high in that category in scoring if you read my post above. As a matter of fact they are 1st in runs so far this season. Against the tigers 9th. That would be 8.4 runs avrg yankees vs tigers 5 runs.
but dont that stats fool one, tigers winning in defense, runs allowed 4.3 vs yankees giving up 5 and include the hits allowed where tigers winning.
So……. Im not sure if il touch and risk any on choosing side but im temtpted…
for me yankees has no business giving -150 to the tigers and having tigers plus 1.5 at -131 at tigers home. That -131 is bettable if that is a word, i mean an alright juice for me as this is baseball.
you see those stats offensively and defensively will not point to yankees if we just inculde the stats of yankees road against tigers home. Those numbers will be different and will give Tigers the slight advantage but aint that important as the sample size will be too low, 3 road games so far and 3 home games so far. So….. got to use all and just use those road home as an awareness. Totals yes thats a good addition.
I aint taking yankees giving points thats for sure.
but hey weighing things, pre game bets, my bet should be on the totals…
ok all set
where is playa 1 ?
Are you ready?
1
With regards choosing sides, very evidently yankees will be in a high in that category in scoring if you read my post above. As a matter of fact they are 1st in runs so far this season. Against the tigers 9th. That would be 8.4 runs avrg yankees vs tigers 5 runs.
but dont that stats fool one, tigers winning in defense, runs allowed 4.3 vs yankees giving up 5 and include the hits allowed where tigers winning.
So……. Im not sure if il touch and risk any on choosing side but im temtpted…
for me yankees has no business giving -150 to the tigers and having tigers plus 1.5 at -131 at tigers home. That -131 is bettable if that is a word, i mean an alright juice for me as this is baseball.
you see those stats offensively and defensively will not point to yankees if we just inculde the stats of yankees road against tigers home. Those numbers will be different and will give Tigers the slight advantage but aint that important as the sample size will be too low, 3 road games so far and 3 home games so far. So….. got to use all and just use those road home as an awareness. Totals yes thats a good addition.
I aint taking yankees giving points thats for sure.
but hey weighing things, pre game bets, my bet should be on the totals…
Now in regards to being malicious, or those conspiracy theorist in sports wagering, we can use that too to cap if you got knowledge on what had happened yesterday in mlb, the “movement”
what happened anyway?
whoa most of the games was a feast for the “over chasers”
yes sir some example imagine thats yankees pits overs is losing only to win the overs in the end, same with stl bos scoring 3 runs in f5 and went on to finish with 9 runs. Whoa a feast.
I saw 11/15 games where chaser wins if they chase overs and played all those 15 games , 11 4.
Back to being malicious, how can we use that today? Well as for me being deep and serious for a quick heist early
( first play banger )
it help me to choose banging big between f5 or full game
it’s a new week fellas if you think yesterday conditioning of the mind will happen very early today, i say…… NO.
that’s the answer.
what do i mean….. oh boy i mean “f5 under and full game under can happen or the f5 over but full game under in this first game. But not over and over.
see my point?
Dang you helped me into. Thank you for sharing something oooops i mean for one question that i answered with a bunch.
anyway last time i checked i got question marks along the way did i get atleast one? I think nope. Anyway whatever aint that important you should check your manners but not too important who knows you might been busy understandable. Nothing against that i just want to share i aint gullibale with thay but thats irrelevant for the play so….. lol
ok…… now we clear…….
bang the low
1
Now in regards to being malicious, or those conspiracy theorist in sports wagering, we can use that too to cap if you got knowledge on what had happened yesterday in mlb, the “movement”
what happened anyway?
whoa most of the games was a feast for the “over chasers”
yes sir some example imagine thats yankees pits overs is losing only to win the overs in the end, same with stl bos scoring 3 runs in f5 and went on to finish with 9 runs. Whoa a feast.
I saw 11/15 games where chaser wins if they chase overs and played all those 15 games , 11 4.
Back to being malicious, how can we use that today? Well as for me being deep and serious for a quick heist early
( first play banger )
it help me to choose banging big between f5 or full game
it’s a new week fellas if you think yesterday conditioning of the mind will happen very early today, i say…… NO.
that’s the answer.
what do i mean….. oh boy i mean “f5 under and full game under can happen or the f5 over but full game under in this first game. But not over and over.
see my point?
Dang you helped me into. Thank you for sharing something oooops i mean for one question that i answered with a bunch.
anyway last time i checked i got question marks along the way did i get atleast one? I think nope. Anyway whatever aint that important you should check your manners but not too important who knows you might been busy understandable. Nothing against that i just want to share i aint gullibale with thay but thats irrelevant for the play so….. lol
Bruce Dreckman 23-4 to over last year. I got torkelson and Judge each separate hit a double plus money. Giant outfield. Would take Greene but had bad hammy recently. I’m gonna pass on total. But hey maybe some snowflakes in the eyes.
My girl left me because gambling. Bet I can get her back.
0
@Miracling2
Bruce Dreckman 23-4 to over last year. I got torkelson and Judge each separate hit a double plus money. Giant outfield. Would take Greene but had bad hammy recently. I’m gonna pass on total. But hey maybe some snowflakes in the eyes.
@Miracling2 Bruce Dreckman 23-4 to over last year. I got torkelson and Judge hit a double plus money. Giant outfield. Would take Greene but had bad hammy recently.
game of unders this game.
im about to bet tigers plus 1.5 now.
-131
im just thinking how many units. Maybe 40%.
bol
@Fuse
Fuse
0
Quote Originally Posted by Thinkb4ubet:
@Miracling2 Bruce Dreckman 23-4 to over last year. I got torkelson and Judge hit a double plus money. Giant outfield. Would take Greene but had bad hammy recently.
“Scooby” and “Cookie” Scooby wants a Scooby snack.
we can get those snack… but we gunnin for the steaks and lobsters here maybe an engine for a yatch too if you are in the same bost as mine. Ooops just a metaphor i dont have a plan having a yatch lol.
lets gaw? Quick first inning outs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Thinkb4ubet:
“Scooby” and “Cookie” Scooby wants a Scooby snack.
we can get those snack… but we gunnin for the steaks and lobsters here maybe an engine for a yatch too if you are in the same bost as mine. Ooops just a metaphor i dont have a plan having a yatch lol.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.