All Forums | College Football

TUESDAYS SHARPS$$$$$$$

...

Participants:

Search

Posts: 1287

poolman11

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2011

Posts: 16326

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:00 PM ET #501

primetime

i agree no way these off the radar games should see anything this early really???? wtf

0

Betohio

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2012

Posts: 22

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:04 PM ET #502

Pool I was looking at the Miami Red hawks not buckeyes.

Take a hour go to best buy and get a new power cord . I will give your my charge card!

0

cchsvikes1

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2008

Posts: 390

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:11 PM ET #503

Im not good at decoding! Pool-- are you liking the home teams i assume?

0

philly387

Banned

Joined: Dec, 2011

Posts: 2076

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:11 PM ET #504

ALL FRIEND REQUESTS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED

0

tedFRAUD

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2012

Posts: 193

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:13 PM ET #505

Wyoming is undefeated. However, they are MISSING Luke Martinez for first time this year with a broken finger. He is tied for team lead in scoring average.

0

JBAtl

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2013

Posts: 1

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:18 PM ET #506

Some may know this already but Wyoming top guard is out with broken hand. Ruled out late yesterday from an off campus incident.

0

Johnnyclutch22

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2012

Posts: 211

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:19 PM ET #507

man this thread was confusing yesterday.....o well lets win $$$ today poolio and la we trust in!!!!

0

poolman11

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2011

Posts: 16326

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:21 PM ET #508

un real everybody knows i havent got a clue to any stats or trends

i wager reading lines 100%

0

LAGameofInches

Captain

Joined: Jun, 2012

Posts: 5188

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:21 PM ET #509

guys a LOT of mismatches all over CBB and NBA. you all mention the Wichita State game and when the line increases like this its to sway people OFF of Wichita State, which is the correct side.

The high lines on teams like Ohio State and Kentucky have too little value for someone like me. I would like to see Ohio State crush another team before laying that type of chalk. I think when you have a mismatch and the spread is close to 20 points, you have a good chance to cover the spread. The substitutes come in late and even though OSU will certainly have a big lead, it will probably boil down to how effectively the bench can score. On the other hand, OSU has had quite a few mismatches so the bench has gotten some time and I think anything LESS than 20 points would be a play in my book.

The team that i think has the best chance of covering an inflated line is Butler. I think that Penn will be hard pressed to score more than 45 points meaning Butler needs to get around the 60 point mark to cover. Their defense is suffocating so its not like Penn will be able to score either half. I would definitely ride Butler in the first half of this game.

Finally, I just can't see UAB not demolishing Georgia Southern tonight. It's a no brainer as UAB avgs about 80 points at home and Georgia Southern about 55 on the road. I would play that discrepancy just on principle.

In the NBA, poor Brooklyn takes its struggles to OKC. You have one team that can't score versus another that can't stop scoring. Yes I know its the NBA but this is a serious mismatch if you look at the positions and style of play. Westbrook vs. Wiliams is interesting but aside from that OKC has MAJOR advantages across the board, including the SECOND UNIT

.

Also, the SA Spurs are in Milwaukee where they perennially dont' do well. I think that is the reason for a shorter line. They will win and cover this game imo. They are far better than Milwaukee and will be able to score enough that the Bucks are out of reach.

Lastly, UTAH returns home to play the TWolves with a short line. While this game is pretty even in nature, this is a spot where I think that the Jazz are motivated to get a W and the short line should not be a concern. I don't see a blowout here but I do see the Jazz continuing their home dominance over the TWolves.

As for the Sugar Bowl, I really like the OVER in the game. I think that the running attack of Florida will be too much for Louisville though I do believe that Louisville will compete and put up points themselves. I would personally like to see Louisville cover and there is nothing that shows they cannot. Special teams are also sound on both teams though the Florida kicker is not real good so that may lead to more 4th down conversions for Florida which in the end could mean more 7 points versus 3 points.

POOL, your thoughts?

0

guys a LOT of mismatches all over CBB and NBA. you all mention the Wichita State game and when the line increases like this its to sway people OFF of Wichita State, which is the correct side.

The high lines on teams like Ohio State and Kentucky have too little value for someone like me. I would like to see Ohio State crush another team before laying that type of chalk. I think when you have a mismatch and the spread is close to 20 points, you have a good chance to cover the spread. The substitutes come in late and even though OSU will certainly have a big lead, it will probably boil down to how effectively the bench can score. On the other hand, OSU has had quite a few mismatches so the bench has gotten some time and I think anything LESS than 20 points would be a play in my book.

The team that i think has the best chance of covering an inflated line is Butler. I think that Penn will be hard pressed to score more than 45 points meaning Butler needs to get around the 60 point mark to cover. Their defense is suffocating so its not like Penn will be able to score either half. I would definitely ride Butler in the first half of this game.

Finally, I just can't see UAB not demolishing Georgia Southern tonight. It's a no brainer as UAB avgs about 80 points at home and Georgia Southern about 55 on the road. I would play that discrepancy just on principle.

In the NBA, poor Brooklyn takes its struggles to OKC. You have one team that can't score versus another that can't stop scoring. Yes I know its the NBA but this is a serious mismatch if you look at the positions and style of play. Westbrook vs. Wiliams is interesting but aside from that OKC has MAJOR advantages across the board, including the SECOND UNIT

.

Also, the SA Spurs are in Milwaukee where they perennially dont' do well. I think that is the reason for a shorter line. They will win and cover this game imo. They are far better than Milwaukee and will be able to score enough that the Bucks are out of reach.

Lastly, UTAH returns home to play the TWolves with a short line. While this game is pretty even in nature, this is a spot where I think that the Jazz are motivated to get a W and the short line should not be a concern. I don't see a blowout here but I do see the Jazz continuing their home dominance over the TWolves.

As for the Sugar Bowl, I really like the OVER in the game. I think that the running attack of Florida will be too much for Louisville though I do believe that Louisville will compete and put up points themselves. I would personally like to see Louisville cover and there is nothing that shows they cannot. Special teams are also sound on both teams though the Florida kicker is not real good so that may lead to more 4th down conversions for Florida which in the end could mean more 7 points versus 3 points.

POOL, your thoughts?

4headies

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 905

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:22 PM ET #510

Quote Originally Posted by tedFRAUD:

I got it at -5.5, now up to -7.5

looking for validation from the dream team

DT rarely likes the roadies. Come on poolio, set em straight.

0

poolman11

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2011

Posts: 16326

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:25 PM ET #511

my lap top it a toshiba and i cant buy a replacement cord ive tried so my buddy found one it worked great but now its wiggly and dont always charge i wiggle it then dont touch it and it blinks on off but its holding now

0

EB14_VB

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 143

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:32 PM ET #512

Pool or LA, what do you make of the Creighton/Ill St. line? Saw it at 2.5 to start the day, my book now has it at a pk.... Public hammering creighton.

Same thing happening in Tulsa/Buffalo except even more of the public is on tulsa than creighton.

BOL & Happy New Year to everyone that helps make this the best thread on covers.

0

poolman11

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2011

Posts: 16326

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:38 PM ET #513

LA

brother i have to stay away from the nba and wager 100%entirely from your suggestions (which have been incredible ) to say the least . i saw the uab descrepancy as you mentioned i agree the total looks juicey on the bowl game seems your nba is spot on other then as we all certainly understand anything can happen i agree with high chalk favs i typically stay away purely as you implied they bring in the bench and coast great to have you chime in brother i love your word chime its a catchy new saying thanks brother much appreciated im sure im speaking for all of us

0

scottgar

Banned

Joined: Nov, 2012

Posts: 64

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:38 PM ET #514

What model Toshiba poolma, I may have an old power adaptor I can GIVE you.

Also, if you'd accept my PM I'd like to talk laptops with you

0

philly387

Banned

Joined: Dec, 2011

Posts: 2076

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:42 PM ET #515

ohio st charts slightly disagree

witchta st charts slightly disagree (Road team??)

florida st charts slightly disagree (Road team??)

syracuse charts very slightly agree

evansville charts disagree

0

capskip

Legend

Joined: Oct, 2009

Posts: 33526

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:45 PM ET #516

Best of Luck today...

0

philly387

Banned

Joined: Dec, 2011

Posts: 2076

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:45 PM ET #517

Quote Originally Posted by tedFRAUD:

philly/pool,

what do the charts and shore say about:

Wichita St

Northern Iowa

Arizona St

Witchta St charts slightly disagree

Northern Iowa charts agree

Arizona St charts show nothing

0

tedFRAUD

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2012

Posts: 193

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:49 PM ET #518

thanks philly

0

2LEGIT2QUITU

MVP

Joined: Jan, 2010

Posts: 17400

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:49 PM ET #519

BOL POOL

0

Wadecounty77

Prospect

Joined: Feb, 2011

Posts: 53

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:51 PM ET #520

Poolman, I've only been on Covers for a few years and don't post much, but I've followed your plays and research and respect your opinion and all of the work you put into your picks. Thanks for sharing and keep up the great work! Happy New Year and best of luck to everyone! Hope it's a great year for all!

0

poolman11

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2011

Posts: 16326

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:52 PM ET #521

i checked the nba after la

the lines are sharp and from what i see i cant give a side and have to trust you

0

trbolger

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2012

Posts: 31

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:54 PM ET #522

Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches:

POOL good to see you back. Yesterday was a fantastic day. Had a line discrepancy in the Wisconsin game and it turned out right on. The halftime line was listed at 3 but the game line at 4. Thus the game line should have been 6. In the end they pushed the half and lost the game by 6 not covering. But I really thought Wisconsin had the win and was the right side as they had Stanford where they wanted them. All they had to do was drive the field but unfortunately the qb threw a wretched INT. Unfortunately that's the game that people wager on.

Had no angle on the late game but its hard when you're not here because I don't feel comfortable when people just follow me even though I was right on most things yesterday. I came in here to give insights and help everyone but its better when you all digest the information and decide which plays warrant your following to wager on. Just being honest and I hope you appreciate that. Luckily there were quite a few winning propositions yesterday so everyone did well.

LA, Pool, Philly, Kentucky, BYP, and Tied-up,

I have a curious "line discrepancy" that occurred with the Wisky/Stanford game and I'd like your theory as to why this occurred, if you have a second to offer your thoughts, please.

I use a local and it's done online. The line all day was 7, all the way up to game time. Everywhere else I looked it was between 3 and 4. I liked Wisky to win or at least cover the +4 for my own reasons and those mentioned by LA, But that crazy discrepancy scared me off a "max-bet." I didn't want to add to the chaos on this thread yesterday and win or loose I've planned to pose this situation to you boys today. BTW THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH THE GEORGIA TECH GAME and I thought it was a fluke - there it was about a 3.5 point discrepancy in favor of GT. I'd love your thoughts and wouldn't mind sharing if I see something like this happen again in the future before kickoff or tip. Thanks in advance.

Best of luck and regards,

T

0

Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches:

POOL good to see you back. Yesterday was a fantastic day. Had a line discrepancy in the Wisconsin game and it turned out right on. The halftime line was listed at 3 but the game line at 4. Thus the game line should have been 6. In the end they pushed the half and lost the game by 6 not covering. But I really thought Wisconsin had the win and was the right side as they had Stanford where they wanted them. All they had to do was drive the field but unfortunately the qb threw a wretched INT. Unfortunately that's the game that people wager on.

Had no angle on the late game but its hard when you're not here because I don't feel comfortable when people just follow me even though I was right on most things yesterday. I came in here to give insights and help everyone but its better when you all digest the information and decide which plays warrant your following to wager on. Just being honest and I hope you appreciate that. Luckily there were quite a few winning propositions yesterday so everyone did well.

LA, Pool, Philly, Kentucky, BYP, and Tied-up,

I have a curious "line discrepancy" that occurred with the Wisky/Stanford game and I'd like your theory as to why this occurred, if you have a second to offer your thoughts, please.

I use a local and it's done online. The line all day was 7, all the way up to game time. Everywhere else I looked it was between 3 and 4. I liked Wisky to win or at least cover the +4 for my own reasons and those mentioned by LA, But that crazy discrepancy scared me off a "max-bet." I didn't want to add to the chaos on this thread yesterday and win or loose I've planned to pose this situation to you boys today. BTW THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH THE GEORGIA TECH GAME and I thought it was a fluke - there it was about a 3.5 point discrepancy in favor of GT. I'd love your thoughts and wouldn't mind sharing if I see something like this happen again in the future before kickoff or tip. Thanks in advance.

Best of luck and regards,

T

Q_Logic897

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 43

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:54 PM ET #523

Hope someone has some suggestions

for a good parlay today w/ all the input coming in..

suggestions appreciated

0

poolman11

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2011

Posts: 16326

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 2:55 PM ET #524

gar

aka the greatest doorman ever

i promise brother i will accept friend request buddy i just havent got around there yet but i definitly will sorry for delay

0

philly387

Banned

Joined: Dec, 2011

Posts: 2076

Posted: Jan. 2, 2013 - 3:03 PM ET #525

Quote Originally Posted by trbolger:

LA, Pool, Philly, Kentucky, BYP, and Tied-up,

I have a curious "line discrepancy" that occurred with the Wisky/Stanford game and I'd like your theory as to why this occurred, if you have a second to offer your thoughts, please.

I use a local and it's done online. The line all day was 7, all the way up to game time. Everywhere else I looked it was between 3 and 4. I liked Wisky to win or at least cover the +4 for my own reasons and those mentioned by LA, But that crazy discrepancy scared me off a "max-bet." I didn't want to add to the chaos on this thread yesterday and win or loose I've planned to pose this situation to you boys today. BTW THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH THE GEORGIA TECH GAME and I thought it was a fluke - there it was about a 3.5 point discrepancy in favor of GT. I'd love your thoughts and wouldn't mind sharing if I see something like this happen again in the future before kickoff or tip. Thanks in advance.

Best of luck and regards,

T

Sorry I have no clue about line movements unless someone is hurt. You have to let poolman or LA respond to that I think.

0

All Forums | College Football

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

TUESDAYS SHARPS$$$$$$$

Hot Forum Topics