All Forums | College Football

Vegas's sharpest bettors bowl bets.....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 117274
Posts: 481
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 195
Posted: #326
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1511
Posted: #327
Hello everyone lots of controversy here.

I have  handicapped the Nebraska-Arizona Game

The line is 39.5 for the total

My number is 39.05 for this game

I can say with reasonable certainty that this does not appear to be a game that professionals would be playing the "over"

I only concentrate on totals, and I do not believe this is a game to wager on

I have no play, unless the line moves more than 4 points.

If anything I would be the under.

Best of luck and Best wishes to all

Totally.....Shirley
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 241
Posted: #328
I am here.  Unfortunately boys I am not able to sit at a keyboard all day and bicker back and forth on covers.com

If you don't like my information, don't play it.  Fade it for all I care.  I am locked into these plays based on the inside information I receive.  I don't come on here and fight with anyone, I just pass info along to people that are interested.  If you are not, fine by me.  If I was never let in on the information I am giving here, I would still be losing money gambling.  But since my superiors at work let me in, I am passing the info along.  I never knew doing a good deed was a crime.

Bottom line, if you aren't interested just move on.  It is your loss, not mine.  I've never known someone that was considered terrible based on 1 loss and 1 push.  Odd how so many people jump to conclusions.

  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 241
Posted: #329
Quote Originally Posted by Dowen:

This place amazes me...someone said two pages ago about all the "great cappers" on this site on the right side...wtf...most all were on A&M.  OVER was the right play!  Missed fg...pat? 

I was in the mix with heyrube (page two or so) we put in a ton of winning plays for walters.  Most money I could ever imagine winning!  For those that don't know who he is should not be gambling much less bashing his shit.  I think cjack is ligit and most people that are here bahing him have no clue about winning and losing!  Over was the right side.  Get off his nuts unless you really like them.



Couldn't have said it better myself......
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #330

ok, listen the fuck up!

 

any and all of you who are bashing on CJack because the over didn't hit on this game... you are fucking idiots!  watch the game!  IF Fezzik did indeed bet big on the over as CJack, then Fezzik had the right bet... he capped the game dead on, and i say this because i watched the game... and anyone else who watched the game should know... this game should have FLOWN over the total...

so the fact that this was a very bad beat loss, means that, if anything, this would support the possibility that he really did give good info...

i'm not saying i believe this is all true... what i am saying is that game played out like an over, and i don't find it AT ALL hard to believe that some seriously heavy hitters were on the over... and lost their asses on it...

 

so if you lost too... tough fucking luck!  don't blame CJack...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1413
Posted: #331
We need a win Cjack whats the next play?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 241
Posted: #332
Quote Originally Posted by GSP10:

We need a win Cjack whats the next play?

Nebraska/Zona over the lowest total you can find.

In Vegas the Hard Rock and Golden Nugget are both sitting at 40, 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5007
Posted: #333

27 minutes of scoreless play

a blocked PAT

a failed 2 point conversion

3 dropped pick 6 interception attempts

All this and 64 was a  FU&*(^ push..............come on people, OVER was the play here PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

Cjack..........never mind the idiots. Keep doin your thing

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #334

good call Alien... totally agree... this was a big time moose on the Over... especially if you bet it at the number he told people to bet it at, which was 64 or 64.5... i took a push at 64...

 

just cracks me up that people are too stupid to realize which is the right side of a bet, and instead start piling on against a pick that missed a cover by 1 or 2 points at most, with the last 2 TDs having a missed XP because UGA had to sub in a kicker (???), and then A&M inexplicably went for 2... all after a 27 minute scoreless start...

gimme a break you!  i had this game bet before he posted, and saw it as hopeful confirmation... didn't get the win, but the bet was correct...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1511
Posted: #335
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:

27 minutes of scoreless play

a blocked PAT

a failed 2 point conversion

3 dropped pick 6 interception attempts

All this and 64 was a  FU&*(^ push..............come on people, OVER was the play here PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

Cjack..........never mind the idiots. Keep doin your thing



Alien, your logic is sound, and I had the "over as a minimum wager, but it certainly is depressing when both teams take a quarter and a half to shake off the rust.

If this game is played 100 times, I believe it would go over 67,  60% of the time or so.

It was indeed the "correct side" and cjack was right here.

I don't have anything for the Arizona game, so I am somewhat perplexed at this wise guy "over " wager.

However, I hope it wins. It's much more fun to watch a high scoring game, than a boring 21-10 one (at least for me it is).

Best of luck and Best Wishes,

Totally.....Shirley
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #336

i sort of agree with Shirley... not gonna be playing the total on the NU-Zona game... looks like an ugly ass crapfest to me... don't know what people would be seeing to suggest otherwise...

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 8002
Posted: #337
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

ok, listen the fuck up!

 

any and all of you who are bashing on CJack because the over didn't hit on this game... you are fucking idiots!  watch the game!  IF Fezzik did indeed bet big on the over as CJack, then Fezzik had the right bet... he capped the game dead on, and i say this because i watched the game... and anyone else who watched the game should know... this game should have FLOWN over the total...

so the fact that this was a very bad beat loss, means that, if anything, this would support the possibility that he really did give good info...

i'm not saying i believe this is all true... what i am saying is that game played out like an over, and i don't find it AT ALL hard to believe that some seriously heavy hitters were on the over... and lost their asses on it...

 

so if you lost too... tough fucking luck!  don't blame CJack...

Ice .. I agree with you 110 % . C-Jack has said all along these are not his plays and if you follow and lose its your own fault . Keep that peace bro !!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 9415
Posted: #338

Cjack - thanks for posting your plays. 

I personally don't care if they came from the Sharpest bettor in all of Vegas, or from a retarded janitor - everyone should still cap their own plays, before putting down their money.  A lot of folks don't realize this, and that is why bookmaking is so profitable.

I capped the UGA/TXAM over, and was on the wrong side of a solid play.  Crap happens....  We have all been there.

Tx Tech -7 is the only other play on your card, that I agree with, but that only means I would not put money on the others.  I wish you good luck, and ignore the rabble.  Most of these morons probably blindly tailed and are pissed, b/c they don't understand capping football.

Peace

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 3476
Posted: #339
Quote Originally Posted by Big12games:

ROOBER22

"whatever hate him all u want but cjack is legit ive made money all yr off the dude"

My response below:

You joined Covers last month, how could you have followed Cjack and made money "all year". It doesn't make sense

robbur22  View Space | Friends | Playbook

Prospect
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 67
Location: Virginia



You don't have to join anything or be any kind of member to read any threads.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3712
Posted: #340
push, loss, win, whatever...(I lost)...the Over was the "correct" side, but in the end all that matters is the result - dude never said these picks were guaranteed and you can play them or not..up to the individual...one play I will NOT be playing is the Nebraska Total...I cannot see this reaching 40 without several ST TD's or defensive TD's. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 102
Posted: #341

A push @ 64....How many of us were able to get 64.  Right after the original post the line moved above 64....NO KNOCK...just 0-2 for most of us not 1-1.  I'm an adult..I chose the over and I still think it was the right side.....just hoping to be profitable now with the others.....

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #342
does anybody think texas tech will struggle now that their coach is out
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 674
Posted: #343
Quote Originally Posted by dtown09:

does anybody think texas tech will struggle now that their coach is out
yea i do think they struggle. may sit this one out.Submit
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 674
Posted: #344
cjack just remember pal your damned if you do and damned if you don't. theres degenerates in here trying to pay there bills thats the people who are gonna bitch and complain. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2607
Posted: #345
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:

Dowen,

I like your style.....Are you still a runner for Walters?

Thanks

Alien

Don't wanna talk about in an open thread like this but the answer is no.  PM me if you want. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 241
Posted: #346
Quote Originally Posted by dtown09:

does anybody think texas tech will struggle now that their coach is out

We haven't seen any bet back from these guys who played Texas Tech yet.  I will keep posted if I see it.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2607
Posted: #347
Anyone come in big on the afternoon games today?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 241
Posted: #348
Quote Originally Posted by Dowen:

Anyone come in big on the afternoon games today?

Just got a text that one respected player is on Temple +5.  Nothing to fire on, and I won't be betting it until I get more than just 1 guy on it.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2067
Posted: #349

My fiance works for the bus company that took Temple to DC this week. She saw the Temple head coach eating fluffer nutters with the Temple mascot (an owl) before getting on the bus. She used to be  a runner in college at St.Joe's and dated the mascot for Temple back in the 80's, so she knows the mascot when she's sees it.

I usually dont post, but felt I should share this inside info with you guys. Take this info and do whatever you think is appropriate.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 360
Posted: #350
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

My fiance works for the bus company that took Temple to DC this week. She saw the Temple head coach eating fluffer nutters with the Temple mascot (an owl) before getting on the bus. She used to be  a runner in college at St.Joe's and dated the mascot for Temple back in the 80's, so she knows the mascot when she's sees it.

I usually dont post, but felt I should share this inside info with you guys. Take this info and do whatever you think is appropriate.


hahhaaa
im all in on temple !!
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.