keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
0
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
Steve Fezzik is facing of with Lance Blankenship in the final for leroys money talks contest it started with 14 contestants doing 7 picks against the spread each week winner gets 80k.
0
Steve Fezzik is facing of with Lance Blankenship in the final for leroys money talks contest it started with 14 contestants doing 7 picks against the spread each week winner gets 80k.
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
Exactly ! I reade an article by Walters or the other guy listed here. Googled them both yesterday. The main point one guy use was a Line that some book puts out on Sunday or early monfay. He would get + 1 on a team that by tuesday would be -3.
He wrote, that is where he wins his money.
Another example was the "new QB Romo was going to start. line came out on Sunday. He grabbed it and the line swung 5 points. It is about getting a line early and doing your research.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
Exactly ! I reade an article by Walters or the other guy listed here. Googled them both yesterday. The main point one guy use was a Line that some book puts out on Sunday or early monfay. He would get + 1 on a team that by tuesday would be -3.
He wrote, that is where he wins his money.
Another example was the "new QB Romo was going to start. line came out on Sunday. He grabbed it and the line swung 5 points. It is about getting a line early and doing your research.
Although Fezzik has picked Wyoming in his contest, he hasn't personally pounded it across town. They have to pick games happening this weekend, so although he felt better about it than some NFL games, it isn't a play he personally bet.
However you can bet on Fezzik to beat Blankenship on bookmaker at -150. Keep in mind Blankenship is fading Billy Walters in 2 of his plays (Billy bet Broncos -13, and Steelers -1) so he is already fighting upstream!
0
Although Fezzik has picked Wyoming in his contest, he hasn't personally pounded it across town. They have to pick games happening this weekend, so although he felt better about it than some NFL games, it isn't a play he personally bet.
However you can bet on Fezzik to beat Blankenship on bookmaker at -150. Keep in mind Blankenship is fading Billy Walters in 2 of his plays (Billy bet Broncos -13, and Steelers -1) so he is already fighting upstream!
It would appear that Sports Handicapping Contest have made public information that might have been more restricted in past years. It almost looks like a PR tool that Casinos and Books in Vegas use to promote public interest in their Gambling Houses. There Sports Radio programs on that are supported by Books in Vegas and have been for years. It is a multi billion dollar bussiness and if the US government would support it properly it would create a huge tax base to help ballance our budget. Read and compare CJ's info be responsible and enjoy the holliday's... G L All
0
It would appear that Sports Handicapping Contest have made public information that might have been more restricted in past years. It almost looks like a PR tool that Casinos and Books in Vegas use to promote public interest in their Gambling Houses. There Sports Radio programs on that are supported by Books in Vegas and have been for years. It is a multi billion dollar bussiness and if the US government would support it properly it would create a huge tax base to help ballance our budget. Read and compare CJ's info be responsible and enjoy the holliday's... G L All
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
Good Info.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them
interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack
you want to buy some swamp land in fla. dizney is interested, but im giving you first shot. happy new year
Hey jimmbo, don't you mean that you live in a swamp in Florida? And that unemployment is interested, but you'll give welfare the first shot. Keep my name outta ur mouth little bitch.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmbo:
you want to buy some swamp land in fla. dizney is interested, but im giving you first shot. happy new year
Hey jimmbo, don't you mean that you live in a swamp in Florida? And that unemployment is interested, but you'll give welfare the first shot. Keep my name outta ur mouth little bitch.
It would appear that Sports Handicapping Contest have made public information that might have been more restricted in past years. It almost looks like a PR tool that Casinos and Books in Vegas use to promote public interest in their Gambling Houses. There Sports Radio programs on that are supported by Books in Vegas and have been for years. It is a multi billion dollar bussiness and if the US government would support it properly it would create a huge tax base to help ballance our budget. Read and compare CJ's info be responsible and enjoy the holliday's... G L All
Why do you want sports gambling taxed? That is the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiamondNick:
It would appear that Sports Handicapping Contest have made public information that might have been more restricted in past years. It almost looks like a PR tool that Casinos and Books in Vegas use to promote public interest in their Gambling Houses. There Sports Radio programs on that are supported by Books in Vegas and have been for years. It is a multi billion dollar bussiness and if the US government would support it properly it would create a huge tax base to help ballance our budget. Read and compare CJ's info be responsible and enjoy the holliday's... G L All
Why do you want sports gambling taxed? That is the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
Better put, this guy is one of the best and well known players in Vegas. Sports betting is his profession for years. Ride his plays and you will win in the LONG RUN.
Well, if he's betting Texas as LARGE as you say, then the long run will be the only hope you have, because Texas will get trounced. Any seasoned college football bettor knows NOT to bet against SEC teams in bowl games. That's been a formula for disaster as long as I can remember, and will be again this year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Better put, this guy is one of the best and well known players in Vegas. Sports betting is his profession for years. Ride his plays and you will win in the LONG RUN.
Well, if he's betting Texas as LARGE as you say, then the long run will be the only hope you have, because Texas will get trounced. Any seasoned college football bettor knows NOT to bet against SEC teams in bowl games. That's been a formula for disaster as long as I can remember, and will be again this year.
Why do you want sports gambling taxed? That is the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
because it would be legal....what dumbazz would be stupid enough to declare winnings anyway?........majority LOSE....the few that are smart enough to WIN....are also smart enough to hide it.....
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
Why do you want sports gambling taxed? That is the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
because it would be legal....what dumbazz would be stupid enough to declare winnings anyway?........majority LOSE....the few that are smart enough to WIN....are also smart enough to hide it.....
I'm a Spartan fan and while the team has lots of talent and lost many of its games in the final seconds, I see them getting blown out (especially after 7 or so players suspended).
0
I'm a Spartan fan and while the team has lots of talent and lost many of its games in the final seconds, I see them getting blown out (especially after 7 or so players suspended).
Fezzik Wyoming +11 Mid Tenn St-Southern Miss OVER 57 Steelers -2 Panthers +10 Browns-Chiefs OVER 37 Titans -3 (2nd best bet) Redskins +3 (Best Bet)
Lance Blankenship Central Florida +2.5 Cowboys +7 Saints-Cowboys OVER 53.5 Packers +2 49ers +8 49ers-Eagles UNDER 42 (2nd best bet) Raiders +14 (Best Bet)
Fezzik did amazing too bad i faded him on steelers but i bet on both of their best bets and so far so good. If your not on the redskins definetly add them to some teases and get on them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bastar:
Fezzik Wyoming +11 Mid Tenn St-Southern Miss OVER 57 Steelers -2 Panthers +10 Browns-Chiefs OVER 37 Titans -3 (2nd best bet) Redskins +3 (Best Bet)
Lance Blankenship Central Florida +2.5 Cowboys +7 Saints-Cowboys OVER 53.5 Packers +2 49ers +8 49ers-Eagles UNDER 42 (2nd best bet) Raiders +14 (Best Bet)
Fezzik did amazing too bad i faded him on steelers but i bet on both of their best bets and so far so good. If your not on the redskins definetly add them to some teases and get on them.
Well, if he's betting Texas as LARGE as you say, then the long run will be the only hope you have, because Texas will get trounced. Any seasoned college football bettor knows NOT to bet against SEC teams in bowl games. That's been a formula for disaster as long as I can remember, and will be again this year.
True, SEC teams are very good in bowl games, but remember.....this is TEXAS and they've been of a different breed when it's bowl time. They win their bowl games. Teams like OhioSt and OU haven't been very strong in bowl games, while teams like USC, Texas, LSU, and Florida have been killer. So while the SEC usually does well in bowl games, especially BCS bowl games and championships......don't count out TEXAS. They are good about showing up in big games, and they've got what it takes to give Alabama all they want.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:
Well, if he's betting Texas as LARGE as you say, then the long run will be the only hope you have, because Texas will get trounced. Any seasoned college football bettor knows NOT to bet against SEC teams in bowl games. That's been a formula for disaster as long as I can remember, and will be again this year.
True, SEC teams are very good in bowl games, but remember.....this is TEXAS and they've been of a different breed when it's bowl time. They win their bowl games. Teams like OhioSt and OU haven't been very strong in bowl games, while teams like USC, Texas, LSU, and Florida have been killer. So while the SEC usually does well in bowl games, especially BCS bowl games and championships......don't count out TEXAS. They are good about showing up in big games, and they've got what it takes to give Alabama all they want.
I respect your opinion SoonaBooma, and your opinion pretty much mirrors conventional thinking, but this game will go very much like the Florida game. I will post a full writeup on this game in the next couple of days, but I will say that Texas is an ideal matchup for Bama's smash mouth approach. The problem for Texas is that they can't mimick Bama's power in practice, so even though they know what's coming, just like Florida, they won't be able to stop it. Ingram and Richardson will bounce off of Texas defenders like pinballs all night long.
The bottom line is that Bama will do what they want to do offensively, and Texas's one-dimensional offense will really not have much of a chance against Bama's defense. I wouldn't be completely shocked to see a shutout. They better not even think about running their top rusher with any frequency, or he won't finish the game.
0
I respect your opinion SoonaBooma, and your opinion pretty much mirrors conventional thinking, but this game will go very much like the Florida game. I will post a full writeup on this game in the next couple of days, but I will say that Texas is an ideal matchup for Bama's smash mouth approach. The problem for Texas is that they can't mimick Bama's power in practice, so even though they know what's coming, just like Florida, they won't be able to stop it. Ingram and Richardson will bounce off of Texas defenders like pinballs all night long.
The bottom line is that Bama will do what they want to do offensively, and Texas's one-dimensional offense will really not have much of a chance against Bama's defense. I wouldn't be completely shocked to see a shutout. They better not even think about running their top rusher with any frequency, or he won't finish the game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.