WAKE FOREST +4 (1000 UNITS)
This team is on a mission and have been overlooked all season. Their offense is powerful and should score easily on this overrated Clemson defense. This will be toooo easy
WAKE FOREST +4 (1000 UNITS)
This team is on a mission and have been overlooked all season. Their offense is powerful and should score easily on this overrated Clemson defense. This will be toooo easy
WAKE FOREST +4 (1000 UNITS)
This team is on a mission and have been overlooked all season. Their offense is powerful and should score easily on this overrated Clemson defense. This will be toooo easy
Yeah pretty easy here. Lol only the 10th ranked team getting 4 and a half vs non ranked. Cannot believe any seasoned bettor would take Wake here
Yeah pretty easy here. Lol only the 10th ranked team getting 4 and a half vs non ranked. Cannot believe any seasoned bettor would take Wake here
They're not even tryin to bait ppl in with a FG spread. They said naw take 4.5 here lol. One of the craziest spreads of the year. Yes, Clemson sucks. Yes, Clemson will prolly cover
They're not even tryin to bait ppl in with a FG spread. They said naw take 4.5 here lol. One of the craziest spreads of the year. Yes, Clemson sucks. Yes, Clemson will prolly cover
@OSU12345
1. He ALWAYS bets the other side of what he post. It's his style. It means he is on Clemson
2. If he were on Wake, WTF does it matter to you? Would it be YOUR money? Start a thread saying you are on Clemson for $10k since in your mind no one who is "seasoned" would take Wake.
Bounce back Yela.
@OSU12345
1. He ALWAYS bets the other side of what he post. It's his style. It means he is on Clemson
2. If he were on Wake, WTF does it matter to you? Would it be YOUR money? Start a thread saying you are on Clemson for $10k since in your mind no one who is "seasoned" would take Wake.
Bounce back Yela.
@carl42
Just out curiosity did he state this style at one time or you his neighbor or something lol? I think alot us have zero clue of his "opposite" posting style.
@carl42
Just out curiosity did he state this style at one time or you his neighbor or something lol? I think alot us have zero clue of his "opposite" posting style.
@OSU12345
Why would no seasoned bettor take WF here? Because of some worn out old saying about taking the points when a non ranked team is favored over a ranked team? If you can't see a reason that a "seasoned bettor" could reasonably back either side in a game, then you arent looking at the game objectively
@OSU12345
Why would no seasoned bettor take WF here? Because of some worn out old saying about taking the points when a non ranked team is favored over a ranked team? If you can't see a reason that a "seasoned bettor" could reasonably back either side in a game, then you arent looking at the game objectively
I think they set line where it is because of history over last 10 and Wakes bubble was burst vs NC. I can see Clemson up 10-11 late and WF loses by 3-4. But who knows. I get the unranked vs ranked angle but this is fb those ranking mean nothing.
I think they set line where it is because of history over last 10 and Wakes bubble was burst vs NC. I can see Clemson up 10-11 late and WF loses by 3-4. But who knows. I get the unranked vs ranked angle but this is fb those ranking mean nothing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.