All Forums | College Football

Week 11 Money

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 39714
Posts: 335
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 7453
Posted: #126
You know, that TN line looks a little shady, they must think TN is going to treat this like thier Super Bowl.  I would have at least thought 7 as high as 9.  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by chad77:


I love this play! That’s my thoughts exactly! OU needs a woodshed Win to prove their worth over ND or Mich.. I personally already have em over ND, but political figures disagree 
rivalry so keep it standard, not L , just normal , crazy stuff can happen in rivalry but this Poke team isn’t up to normal Poke standard , I see OU getting lap  dances by the 4th qtr

that defense is a few weeks away from vast improvement, won’t ever be great as fast as O plays but trust me, those playoff teams don’t want OU in, if Lincoln wasn’t a rookie coach last year we have a different story all around, he panicked that 2nd half but it was obvious OU had the speed & scheme to go with the other big boys, OU would be a dangerous playoff team to everyone, ask Nick if he wants to face OU or ND, he may not answer but you know who he prefers facing 

.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by Trumpinator2020:

I'll give you one Thursday Wahoo. 

Have a good day.  
take your time Mr Pres, big day for you, you can release your winner tomorrow if you prefer 

a wave is coming, I wonder what color it’ll be, all eyes watching today, it’s a very important day for our nation 



gulp 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #129
Quote Originally Posted by Trumpinator2020:

You know, that TN line looks a little shady, they must think TN is going to treat this like thier Super Bowl.  I would have at least thought 7 as high as 9.  

I had 6.5 for my own numbers but thought it would be bet to 7 by Sunday night 

definitely lower than I expected 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 26658
Posted: #130
good luck on the oklahoma play looking at over i personally wont step in front of them

my 43 percent handicapping says too take purdue minnestoa over 58 large 

lotsa of tough games this week i think so far 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 388
Posted: #131
WahooS,

Thanks a lot for the help. Yeah, I'm pounding the Sooners. I think Okie State is horrible.

Last question from me for the week if you have a free minute....How about Iowa State? Baylor off their big win of the year (for them anyway) and now travelling to a really tough place to play. I see a woodshed game here.

Thoughts? 

Thanks so much!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 512
Posted: #132
This thread is awesome.  Totally agree fanboys should stick to fanboy sites.  This is about gambling, ahahahahah!  Sounds like people are getting paid in here all that matters.  Good luck guys I just bet OU (-18) but whatever only my beer money not my wine money.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1820
Posted: #133

Wahoo or anyone know more about Utah's back-up QB?  I like Utah to return to good Defense after they wilted in the desert last Week and shut down Oregon this week.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2016
Posts: 20
Posted: #134

Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

Quote Originally Posted by JS12:

WahooS,Any thoughts on Oklahoma minus the points vs. Okie State?It's a lot of points, but I am thinking Vegas knows what they are doing setting the line that high.Do they take them to the woodshed here?I am thinking yes.Thanks for the advice, appreciate it.
post 67, I set the table, now go eat OU wipes themrivalry factor will keep it a standard sized bet thoughLarge Money rules1. No hated rivals2. No fading of night home dog 3. No bad spots many more rules for me to go large but you get the point keep it friendly with Sooners but approved if you want to bet them, I’m just waiting on line, wanting under 17, will buy half if needed

"No fading of night home dog?" That works with my lean towards BC +17.5 against my beloved Clemson (no favoritism here).   

But, and sorry if I sound dumb, what do you mean by "bad spots?"

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 3461
Posted: #135

You donate money to Universities...

that’s pretty nice of you ...

I donate to the homeless,and cancer research.. 

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #136
Quote Originally Posted by shakey12381:

good luck on the oklahoma play looking at over i personally wont step in front of them

my 43 percent handicapping says too take purdue minnestoa over 58 large 

lotsa of tough games this week i think so far 

I think you’ll get that by a bit, OU tt ov probably good

& 43 percent just barely away from paying juice, which is always my intent 

#winhalflosehalfactsmart


.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by bigdude:

You donate money to Universities...

that’s pretty nice of you ...

I donate to the homeless,and cancer research.. 

 

 
good for you, I donate to many things, I’m a huge animal lover so I’m one of those freaks as well 



.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 26658
Posted: #138
there were times early in my gambling career i wish i could just hit 50 percent 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 3461
Posted: #139

Your the Best 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #140
Quote Originally Posted by JS12:

WahooS,

Thanks a lot for the help. Yeah, I'm pounding the Sooners. I think Okie State is horrible.

Last question from me for the week if you have a free minute....How about Iowa State? Baylor off their big win of the year (for them anyway) and now travelling to a really tough place to play. I see a woodshed game here.

Thoughts? 

Thanks so much!

Baylor is a work in progress from outside looking in, I stopped my involvement with them so haven’t seen near as much of their games nor do I talk to anyone about current team, from Bay to Tom Herm

Iowa St not a blow you out kind of team but I’d consider them or nothing here just because you know going in Baylor won’t win unless tragedy struck the Qb or something , Iowa St prob best in teaser to single digits simply because counting on them to cover over 14.5 could be risky 

I think they win by 17ish if I were guessing, just prefer teaser if you use them 

I’m sure that reads like a scrambled hot mess, welcome to my brain 

.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:


Baylor is a work in progress from outside looking in, I stopped my involvement with them so haven’t seen near as much of their games nor do I talk to anyone about current team, from Bay to Tom Herm

Iowa St not a blow you out kind of team but I’d consider them or nothing here just because you know going in Baylor won’t win unless tragedy struck the Qb or something , Iowa St prob best in teaser to single digits simply because counting on them to cover over 14.5 could be risky 

I think they win by 17ish if I were guessing, just prefer teaser if you use them 

I’m sure that reads like a scrambled hot mess, welcome to my brain 

just prefer to use in a teaser

Left out word tease , old mind does that 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #142
Quote Originally Posted by mjack:

This thread is awesome.  Totally agree fanboys should stick to fanboy sites.  This is about gambling, ahahahahah!  Sounds like people are getting paid in here all that matters.  Good luck guys I just bet OU (-18) but whatever only my beer money not my wine money.  

Yes, keep it at beer money, never wise to pound a rivalry 

if you look from value aspect though, OU was favored by 23-24 over Baylor & won by 33 off top of my head 

should be similar outcome as okie st maybe slightly better than Baylor if any 


.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 153
Posted: #143
[Quote: Originally Posted by BeeRich]

What is the relevance of 43?  Pardon me for not knowing......I see Train pointed it out last week on a different post.  Just curious......

its wahoos supposed winning percentage
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #144
Quote Originally Posted by Ehartmo:

sorry if I sound dumb, what do you mean by "bad spots?"

no question is dumb, we are here to learn & win money

an example of a “bad spot” would be

Purdue beating Ohio St by 30 as a 13 point underdog in a huge night game with all the attention on them, only to be congratulated all week on campus, hit the road & play a pissed off mich st team (& lose)

It’s hard for college aged kids to get up emotionally every week when you involve classes, travel, etc etc

another example of a “bad spot” would be

Memphis blowing a huge lead over an undefeated UCF team that was basically their super bowl only to then go on the road to face a pissed off mizzou team that had 3 losses in a row & was in desperate need of a win, mizzou won by a metric ton & paid me 


.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by RedRockets:

Wahoo or anyone know more about Utah's back-up QB?  I like Utah to return to good Defense after they wilted in the desert last Week and shut down Oregon this week.

I’m thinking under & I almost never bet unders, Utes d should bounce back & their offense looked bad without Qb, I’d expect him to play better at home & the Ducks aren’t very good but I’m keep picturing this 24-20 type game 

I lean under 56.5 for now but definitely could drop that lean as I learn more about the Utah plan this week

If I bet it I’ll post it but for now I don’t know enough info to justify betting an under knowing my skin will crawl as I’m score checking hoping for punts 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25476
Posted: #146
Quote Originally Posted by shakey12381:

there were times early in my gambling career i wish i could just hit 50 percent 
no chance, you were born a winner Shake 
.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by shakey12381:

there were times early in my gambling career i wish i could just hit 50 percent 

I call those times "Saturdays." 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 567
Posted: #148
Hey WahooS,

Here's a question....

Last week you were all over Clemson / L'Ville predicting that Clemson would layeth the smacketh down and cover the 40 point spread.

This week, we see Michigan favored by essentially the same 40 points against Rutgers.  Way different styles and that's reflected in a much lower O/U.

The game is similar in that both Clemson & Michigan want to make a statement to the committee that they are a stud team.  Clemson made that statement, presumably Michigan would want to do similar.

Is the question...is making a "statement to the committee" the key to the #4/#5 Michigan's season?  Will Michigan play outside of their comfort zone to put a whoopin on to make that statement?


I dont know if Im saying all this right...I like Michigan to absolutely stomp a bad Rutgers team & they have the D to pitch a shut out, but I could just as easily see them winning 31-0 as 63-0....thus the question, do they need to "make a statement"?

Thanks WahooS!

-HS

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 2892
Posted: #149
Wahoo, I tailed doubleup on Fresno State. As I always do on his large plays. Noticed you have not played it so I would like your thoughts on the game. Thanks Buddy.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 2092
Posted: #150
I think it got lost in the shuffle..... Notre Dame, nighttime, probably cold for the Florida boys. FSU a mess... ND should roll?
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.