All Forums | College Football

*** Week 11 NCAA Football ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 32007
Posts: 197
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #101
page fix
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 38328
Posted: #102
GL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 34702
Posted: #103
I'm a Buckeyes fan, but I'd be absolutely shocked if they cover this weekend.  
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #104
Adding:

Notre Dame  +2.5

Syracuse  +3.5

Notre Dame / Arizona st   Over 59.5
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #105
So far:

Michigan st  -3

TCU  -4.5

Baylor  +6

Notre Dame  +2.5

Syracuse  +3.5

Notre Dame / Arizona st   Over 59.5




Tough card men...............
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 12207
Posted: #106
BOL Boom
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54530
Posted: #107
Sparty/Bucks total at 58 seems a bit high doesnt it? Both teams facing the best defense either has seen.....I really thought i would see 48.5-51.......
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 14
Posted: #108
Train both teams are over machines
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6817
Posted: #109
    
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5105
Posted: #110
 GL Boom
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #111
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:






 33/34 on XP  97%......................11/13 on FG  84.6 % FG


Don't let facts confuse you troll..... You fail again




Oh I forgot, this is Boom land, TRUE, COMPLETE Facts don't count...only just enough of the facts to make your argument correct.

Let's just pretend the kicker (Blewitt...bad name for a kicker) is a freshmen and there's only one year of stats that we should consider, right?  But why stop there when you could make your argument SO MUCH STRONGER.  Let's say anything before OT of their game this past weekend is irrelevant.  Then he'd be 1/1 on FGs and 1/1 on XPs, kicking 100%.  How could I argue those numbers?

I suggest you quit after your next winning pick and only count that one in your record...then you'd be a 100% winning handicapper.  Sort of like not counting your 2H chaser bets a couple years back huh?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #112
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Sparty/Bucks total at 58 seems a bit high doesnt it? Both teams facing the best defense either has seen.....I really thought i would see 48.5-51.......


was my fist thoughts as well...

I seen it at 60.

I do lean under and may play under before it's over with
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 568
Posted: #113
Good luck this week Boom 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #114
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

So far:

Michigan st  -3

TCU  -4.5

Baylor  +6

Notre Dame  +2.5

Syracuse  +3.5

Notre Dame / Arizona st   Over 59.5




Tough card men...............

I like all picks so far except Mich St. 

I think OSU can get the win here, but we will see.

Good luck this week
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #115
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

So far:

Michigan st  -3

TCU  -4.5

Baylor  +6

Notre Dame  +2.5

Syracuse  +3.5

Notre Dame / Arizona st   Over 59.5




Tough card men...............

I like all picks so far except Mich St. 

I think OSU can get the win here, but we will see.

Good luck this week
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1049
Posted: #116
BOL BOOM. mich st should win by 7+. statement game for them playoff committees 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #117

Quote Originally Posted by naesiy:



Oh I forgot, this is Boom land, TRUE, COMPLETE Facts don't count...only just enough of the facts to make your argument correct.

Let's just pretend the kicker (Blewitt...bad name for a kicker) is a freshmen and there's only one year of stats that we should consider, right?  But why stop there when you could make your argument SO MUCH STRONGER.  Let's say anything before OT of their game this past weekend is irrelevant.  Then he'd be 1/1 on FGs and 1/1 on XPs, kicking 100%.  How could I argue those numbers?

I suggest you quit after your next winning pick and only count that one in your record...then you'd be a 100% winning handicapper.  Sort of like not counting your 2H chaser bets a couple years back huh?

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #118
Good luck this week, boom.        
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 133
Posted: #119

Good luck bro.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 3117
Posted: #120
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Sparty/Bucks total at 58 seems a bit high doesnt it? Both teams facing the best defense either has seen.....I really thought i would see 48.5-51.......

No sir.  Both offenses have the edge in this one.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 2685
Posted: #121
'Cuse is such a bold, solid pick.  Then again, so was Pitt last weekend.  Cutcliffe finds ways to not only win these games, but cover by the skin of teeth.

How Chris Blew-it missed that 26-yard chip shot to JUST PUSH at Heinz Field still goes down in infamy as one of my worst beats.  Better yet, why Chryst called a quarterback draw to the right hash where Chris is traditionally terrible from as the last play before the potential GW FG is further over my head. 

Just don't know if I can get back in the ring against these Blue Devils. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #122

Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:



I should be as shamed?

You are a Old Miss fan....am I wrong?

Of course you feel that way.

Let's cry about the " unfortunate " things that have went against Old Miss....

Look...everyone in the country has " miss fortunate things that happen to them all the time... Look, Clemson has had the same things....and I understand. Believe me, I understand.

But let's stop just dismissing the facts... Old Miss LOST.

I have nothing against Old Miss....But if any poll has them in the top 15, it's ridiculous and SEC bias if they do.

No team in the country could lose back to back games and remain in the top 15....unless of course we are talking about Alabama...and that's a whole set of rules.

Ah there it is.  Was waiting for the anti Bama remarks.  Didn't know they lost back to back though.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 5415
Posted: #123
I don't get why some folks have to prove to other folks who is right and who is wrong.We are grown men with the same universal goal....Win money doing what we love.Blowoutgun,take it down a few notches bro.U aren't a good CFB capper u are a great one so let's don't get into all this argueing.I'm guilty of it too....Anyhow,If there is anyone I would consult on tonight's game 0its Boom..My book has it down to Clemson -21 & 43.5..1st half Clem-12.5& 21.5...Team Totals Clemson 32 & Wake 11....I went 9-1 Mon,but have taking beatings Tues and Wed losing Mon night's winnings.My soccer( who has been around 55 to 58% last year) guy who texts me plays went 0-3 on his totals and I played Manchester City -285 which I usually never play anything on ML over 200 unless its MMA.My only win last night was NoIlinois.I just can't get a good read on this Browns- Bengals.I want to play this Clemson game tonight.It really is a waste of time to argue about conferences and which team would beat this team when they aren't scheduled.Boom,really wanted to get your opinion on this Clemson game.I feel like I'm finding a groove with these team totals.When u play totals for both teams one team can screw the whole play out.Bro,I play NFL,NBA,MMA,NCAAB,NCAAW,CFL,WNBA( might be the easiest sport out there),MLB...I also play poker on line ,but that's usually during Summer.I'm sick as a fat dog so I'm at home.U are prob at work and won't get this until later,but I want your opinion on tonight...Respectfully request.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54530
Posted: #124
Tell me about your boys tonite boom......
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 15753
Posted: #125
BOL Bud
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.