All Forums | College Football

*Week 15 Card*

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19819
Posts: 173
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #51
Depends on what you tease in my opinion. I try to stay away from teasing totals but I like to tease a few 6 points lines together occasionally to make them pks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 342
Posted: #52
[Quote: Originally Posted by Whodeysb09]

Scores seem a little crazy, I think ECU can actually stop Tulsa quite a few times.  I think they hold them under 40 personally.  Just depends on what they do to keep them in the game.

Army beats Navy




what Army beats Navy what makes you think that?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #53
I didnt post that havoc. I think Navy wins
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 131
Posted: #54
liking the pics bibendi!  taking you up on alabama 1k and OU for 2k.  jus going bigger on OU cuz its home team and they been making me money all season long!  OU's offense wont stop scoring til the last seconds of the game.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1440
Posted: #55
Any further thoughts on Rutgers/Louisville, Bibendi?  I am leaning on Rutgers and see they are on your card.   I do think R will win it but not sure about them covering against a team desperate for a win. 


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by danstyk:

Any further thoughts on Rutgers/Louisville, Bibendi?  I am leaning on Rutgers and see they are on your card.   I do think R will win it but not sure about them covering against a team desperate for a win. 


I'd say the whole Louisville is desperate for a win card is overplayed. I think Rutgers is pretty desperate for a win too. If you arent desperate for a win why would you play football? Desperation doesnt cover games, talent does. Rutgers by 21

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 187
Posted: #57
Hey Bib... Thinking of dropping 1k on ULL but just not sure on their 3 consecutive losses... Bowl eligibility is just around the corner... Isnt ULL famous for screwing up when it matters the most? Any thoughts...? 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #58
I'm opening a thread for the game tonight street
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 3555
Posted: #59
Bibendi23 - Could use a little insight on a play i want to make - Let me know if i can get a hold of you via message/aim or whatever.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #60
I just sent a friendship request Cameron
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 3555
Posted: #61
Got it - How can i send personal message through?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #62
I wrote on your playbook, check it out
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22
Posted: #63
I realize this is not the forum to post this in, but it is one of the few that I read. 
 
Anyways, I am thinking Frank Mir +305 over Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira would not be a bad move for a small money play.
 
Usually play UFC fights and do pretty well.  Not for sure on this one but at +305 it makes sense.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by diesel01:

I realize this is not the forum to post this in, but it is one of the few that I read. 
 
Anyways, I am thinking Frank Mir +305 over Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira would not be a bad move for a small money play.
 
Usually play UFC fights and do pretty well.  Not for sure on this one but at +305 it makes sense.

Hey man, I've never even see a UFC fight in my life so I have nothing to offer on this subject

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 6
Posted: #65
I LOVE OKLAHOMA THIS WEEKEND. ITS A SOLID BET.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1718
Posted: #66
Bib ..you are a patient man and need to be commended for it...Good work....I respect your opinions...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 317
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by zippys:

liking the pics bibendi!  taking you up on alabama 1k and OU for 2k.  jus going bigger on OU cuz its home team and they been making me money all season long!  OU's offense wont stop scoring til the last seconds of the game.

mizz plays OK on a neutral field...if it matters

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 513
Posted: #68

MTSU is coming off a 52-13 rout of North Texas, its third straight win. The Raiders were led by RB Phillip Tanner. The junior scored six touchdowns, five rushing and one on a kickoff return. He finished with a career-high 159 yards on 14 carries and set the conference record for single-game points and TDs.

 

Tanner was named player of the week on offense and special teams - the first time that's ever happened.

 

The Cajuns dropped their third straight game, 48-3 to Troy. ULL was called for a season-high 15 penalties for 104 yards. That's the most penalties against a Sun Belt team this season. ULL allowed 391 yards rushing to Troy, which had 13 plays of at least 10 yards.

 

During its three-game slide, ULL has allowed an average of 41.7 points and 463.3 yards. Late-season slumps are nothing new for the Cajuns, who lost five of their final six in 2004 and in '06 and '07 fell in four of their final six games.

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 3960
Posted: #69
 ULL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 3147
Posted: #70
Let's talk, bud.

Rutgers tonight.  The whole forum, and some, are all over this team tonight.  Why?  Because Rutgers has won the last 4 games by over 20 ppg.  Louisville has done the opposite, losing by 16 ppg on the road and feels like they are heading the opposite direction.  Is this not the same opportunity we saw last night...

A team with four huge wins up against a team with some poor recent losses, getting way too many points?  Same reason MTSU only got 5...(or so).

I know that sometimes the majority of the forum CAN BE right...but I don't take "consensus" as a solid move.

I actually do like the OVER in this game more so than ATS.  We'll see...we'll see.

Thoughts?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4
Posted: #71
What you guys think about CAL cover by -36 over WASH and Navy by -11 over Army?  Your though.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 362
Posted: #72
Qulicious you had some really good thoughts there bud......too bad they were completely WRONG.  Next time if u want to talk up your lean just start a thread for it.  Don't try to convince the rest of us to go against someone who has made us money ALL YEAR!!!!
 
Just a thought.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 298
Posted: #73
Bibendi,i been following your thoughts most of the season,I have another capper that i been following right along with you.between the two of you i think which-ever way i go with picks for that weekend is about 75% with that said you keep writing and i will keep reading thanx again for thoughts this season.NOS you two!  Bibendi do you think the Oak/MIZZ game will go Over? Also like Rutgers today do you think there game will go Over? thanx again BOL this weekend.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 26206
Posted: #74
BOL this week bib! 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 10
Posted: #75
BOL
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.