Pinnacle sports betting... is the site...
Your top play is SJSU but Sportsbook has the line at +27.5 in which I bought a half to 28....thought you might want to know
Your top play is SJSU but Sportsbook has the line at +27.5 in which I bought a half to 28....thought you might want to know
Your top play is SJSU but Sportsbook has the line at +27.5 in which I bought a half to 28....thought you might want to know
If you woulda seen last weeks I easily had over 50 plays lol...so 26 doesn't sound to bad...
1) Play with money you have your first days of the week ( or willing to spend )
2) If you win them you can bet more into Saturdays games, take what the schedule gives you. For instance block your potential wagers off and always leave yourself with an out.
3) Don't put all your eggs into one basket. take 5 of your best plays for the block and bet on that. even if you manage to lose 3 well your still not down. But when you go 5-0 that's going to fuel your next bets.
4) Use parlays and teasers together
If you woulda seen last weeks I easily had over 50 plays lol...so 26 doesn't sound to bad...
1) Play with money you have your first days of the week ( or willing to spend )
2) If you win them you can bet more into Saturdays games, take what the schedule gives you. For instance block your potential wagers off and always leave yourself with an out.
3) Don't put all your eggs into one basket. take 5 of your best plays for the block and bet on that. even if you manage to lose 3 well your still not down. But when you go 5-0 that's going to fuel your next bets.
4) Use parlays and teasers together
Also the reason I post is to get feedback if someone presents something then I lay off the game or if something happens...But if someone has insight to any of the games I welcome it, I don't like just posting , plays without any reason so if you want to know something or have input ... feel free to discuss, that the reason I try to use forums to give myself another perspective.
Also the reason I post is to get feedback if someone presents something then I lay off the game or if something happens...But if someone has insight to any of the games I welcome it, I don't like just posting , plays without any reason so if you want to know something or have input ... feel free to discuss, that the reason I try to use forums to give myself another perspective.
thoughts on mich/nd...ly nd only wins 13-6 at home after michigan turns it over 6 times, 4 ints by denard. Devin Gardner didnt play qb in this game and Rees was only 8-11 for 105 yds, very sloppy game.
2011 mich won 35-31 at home in first game ever at night at big house, in that game denard threw 3 ints...rees was 27/39 315 yds 3 tds and 2 ints BUT he was throwing to Michael Floyd for 140 yds and Tyler Eifert both gone to NFL and this year they do not have nfl talent at wr or te...
the common denominator is the games were close because Denard threw ints...expect a much cleaner game from Gardner, a guy who is actually a good qb.
I like the fact that Michigan has scrapped the spread offense and gone back to their traditional style of the pro set. The only problem with this in terms of Saturday's matchup is that Michigan is thin in the backfield, losing Drake Johnson to an ACL tear. Derrik Green, Freshman, is now 2nd on the depth chart which is significant considering the experience of the ND defensive front. I think Gardner is a much purer pocket passer than what we've seen over the last few years but he still threw 2 INT's against one of the worst defenses in the country last week. Yes, he is mobile but now that Michigan is in a pro set, he'll have to get most of his yds on his own.I'
ll continue this post with further thoughts in a bit...
thoughts on mich/nd...ly nd only wins 13-6 at home after michigan turns it over 6 times, 4 ints by denard. Devin Gardner didnt play qb in this game and Rees was only 8-11 for 105 yds, very sloppy game.
2011 mich won 35-31 at home in first game ever at night at big house, in that game denard threw 3 ints...rees was 27/39 315 yds 3 tds and 2 ints BUT he was throwing to Michael Floyd for 140 yds and Tyler Eifert both gone to NFL and this year they do not have nfl talent at wr or te...
the common denominator is the games were close because Denard threw ints...expect a much cleaner game from Gardner, a guy who is actually a good qb.
I like the fact that Michigan has scrapped the spread offense and gone back to their traditional style of the pro set. The only problem with this in terms of Saturday's matchup is that Michigan is thin in the backfield, losing Drake Johnson to an ACL tear. Derrik Green, Freshman, is now 2nd on the depth chart which is significant considering the experience of the ND defensive front. I think Gardner is a much purer pocket passer than what we've seen over the last few years but he still threw 2 INT's against one of the worst defenses in the country last week. Yes, he is mobile but now that Michigan is in a pro set, he'll have to get most of his yds on his own.I'
ll continue this post with further thoughts in a bit...
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
Washington State +17 -120
Toledo +17
Penn State -23.5
New Hampshire +4
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
Washington State +17 -120
Toledo +17
Penn State -23.5
New Hampshire +4
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
I think Wazoo will backdoor this cover. Lean USC 1st H. Never know what you're gonna get from either head coach. He's a friggin bad azz pirate. And on the other hand, Kiffin is just lame. I'm sure he will try have both of these QBs try to spray the ball all over the place, even tho he doesn't have the personnel for it. I think they get upset by San Jose St.
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
I think Wazoo will backdoor this cover. Lean USC 1st H. Never know what you're gonna get from either head coach. He's a friggin bad azz pirate. And on the other hand, Kiffin is just lame. I'm sure he will try have both of these QBs try to spray the ball all over the place, even tho he doesn't have the personnel for it. I think they get upset by San Jose St.
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
I think Wazoo will backdoor this cover. Lean USC 1st H. Never know what you're gonna get from either head coach. He's a friggin bad azz pirate. And on the other hand, Kiffin is just lame. I'm sure he will try have both of these QBs try to spray the ball all over the place, even tho he doesn't have the personnel for it. I think they get upset by San Jose St.
Thanks for the post QL...first day off work I've had in awhile so I was able to study and put in a few plays.I'm looking at 4-5 more games bu tI'm trying to catch a better number. I was leaning with North Texas but if the number hits 4, I'm hitting Ohio. Tettleton will put up points against North Texas and Bridgewater is too much against a lot of teams. Indiana's offense should garbage on Navy so I'm contemplating the over or laying the chalk. Notre Dame will probably be a play, waiting to see where the line settles. Hawaii is a bad team butt catching nearly 28 points to another bad team is tempting. And, I'm not sure Tennessee is 2 td's better than Western Kentucky. So, as it stands, I'm still looking at.....
Ohio
Indiana
Notre Dame
Hawaii
Western Kentucky
Ive dropped South Carolina and Utah state from my leans
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
I think Wazoo will backdoor this cover. Lean USC 1st H. Never know what you're gonna get from either head coach. He's a friggin bad azz pirate. And on the other hand, Kiffin is just lame. I'm sure he will try have both of these QBs try to spray the ball all over the place, even tho he doesn't have the personnel for it. I think they get upset by San Jose St.
Thanks for the post QL...first day off work I've had in awhile so I was able to study and put in a few plays.I'm looking at 4-5 more games bu tI'm trying to catch a better number. I was leaning with North Texas but if the number hits 4, I'm hitting Ohio. Tettleton will put up points against North Texas and Bridgewater is too much against a lot of teams. Indiana's offense should garbage on Navy so I'm contemplating the over or laying the chalk. Notre Dame will probably be a play, waiting to see where the line settles. Hawaii is a bad team butt catching nearly 28 points to another bad team is tempting. And, I'm not sure Tennessee is 2 td's better than Western Kentucky. So, as it stands, I'm still looking at.....
Ohio
Indiana
Notre Dame
Hawaii
Western Kentucky
Ive dropped South Carolina and Utah state from my leans
amd - the line on Minn is now -15.5. Think I will tail you on this one as I have not looked at the game at all. Do you knwo if anything has happend to move the line??
amd - the line on Minn is now -15.5. Think I will tail you on this one as I have not looked at the game at all. Do you knwo if anything has happend to move the line??
amd - the line on Minn is now -15.5. Think I will tail you on this one as I have not looked at the game at all. Do you knwo if anything has happend to move the line??
amd - the line on Minn is now -15.5. Think I will tail you on this one as I have not looked at the game at all. Do you knwo if anything has happend to move the line??
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
Washington State +17 -120
Toledo +17
Penn State -23.5
New Hampshire +4
Ohio -5
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
Minnesota -17
San Jose St +28 -120
Washington State +17 -120
Toledo +17
Penn State -23.5
New Hampshire +4
Ohio -5
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
San Jose St +28 -120
Minnesota -17
Washington State +17 -120
Toledo +17
Penn State -23.5
New Hampshire +4
Ohio -5
Notre Dame +4.5
Pitt
San Jose St/Stanford under 53
San Jose St +28 -120
Minnesota -17
Washington State +17 -120
Toledo +17
Penn State -23.5
New Hampshire +4
Ohio -5
Notre Dame +4.5
Pitt
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.