1st Standard Wager for week 2 HAWAII -5 330/300 This line is short !!! Beavers might get their points but are easily 2 scores worse than ARIZONA ( Who Hawaii just Beat ..) Point Spread Ratings have Hawaii by 12.9 +!!Score Chart has -11-17-7-16-20
Very Surprised at this line...I though it would be Hawaii -3 at best...This line will close at 3/3.5...OSU is much improved...they will move the ball on Hawaii...Over looks like a lock at anything 70 and under.
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
1st Standard Wager for week 2 HAWAII -5 330/300 This line is short !!! Beavers might get their points but are easily 2 scores worse than ARIZONA ( Who Hawaii just Beat ..) Point Spread Ratings have Hawaii by 12.9 +!!Score Chart has -11-17-7-16-20
Very Surprised at this line...I though it would be Hawaii -3 at best...This line will close at 3/3.5...OSU is much improved...they will move the ball on Hawaii...Over looks like a lock at anything 70 and under.
Very Surprised at this line...I though it would be Hawaii -3 at best...This line will close at 3/3.5...OSU is much improved...they will move the ball on Hawaii...Over looks like a lock at anything 70 and under.
Beavers should be improved , but they could easily lose here by Double digits+ ....
Total should be 71.5
+
Love Hawaii minus less than a TD
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
Very Surprised at this line...I though it would be Hawaii -3 at best...This line will close at 3/3.5...OSU is much improved...they will move the ball on Hawaii...Over looks like a lock at anything 70 and under.
Beavers should be improved , but they could easily lose here by Double digits+ ....
DUP, curious on your thoughts of the U -6. You originally put it at -7.5 so not a huge difference but getting under 7. Miami looked bad but thought that might impact the line and the public's opinion and skew it a little lower, they also get 2 weeks to prepare. UNC is coming off a big rivalry win and due for a let down???
Thanks for all the insight.
0
DUP, curious on your thoughts of the U -6. You originally put it at -7.5 so not a huge difference but getting under 7. Miami looked bad but thought that might impact the line and the public's opinion and skew it a little lower, they also get 2 weeks to prepare. UNC is coming off a big rivalry win and due for a let down???
DUP, curious on your thoughts of the U -6. You originally put it at -7.5 so not a huge difference but getting under 7. Miami looked bad but thought that might impact the line and the public's opinion and skew it a little lower, they also get 2 weeks to prepare. UNC is coming off a big rivalry win and due for a let down???
Thanks for all the insight.
Shhhhh
I was hoping the Canes would drop even further ....
This is another prime example of overreaction !!!
Not a suggested wager (Yet) but I'll jump on for $110/100. -6 ...Half a Until $100
Miami should dominate both lines of scrimmage ...
O line got owned and should be tired of the bad talk...
Would have made this line -10.5 + before the season ..
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Silk24:
DUP, curious on your thoughts of the U -6. You originally put it at -7.5 so not a huge difference but getting under 7. Miami looked bad but thought that might impact the line and the public's opinion and skew it a little lower, they also get 2 weeks to prepare. UNC is coming off a big rivalry win and due for a let down???
Thanks for all the insight.
Shhhhh
I was hoping the Canes would drop even further ....
This is another prime example of overreaction !!!
Not a suggested wager (Yet) but I'll jump on for $110/100. -6 ...Half a Until $100
Miami should dominate both lines of scrimmage ...
O line got owned and should be tired of the bad talk...
Would have made this line -10.5 + before the season ..
Agreed... I watched entire SMU game and was on SMU. Arky St lost top WR to concussion protocol early but still torched Mustangs in the passing game with a guy making his 2nd career start I believe, so Mason Fine should have a field day
Love hearing this much respect
Mean Green team total over 38 or less might be a MORTGAGE WAGER
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Agreed... I watched entire SMU game and was on SMU. Arky St lost top WR to concussion protocol early but still torched Mustangs in the passing game with a guy making his 2nd career start I believe, so Mason Fine should have a field day
Love hearing this much respect
Mean Green team total over 38 or less might be a MORTGAGE WAGER
South Campus has a early posted total of 59.5 !!!!
I'm limited to $500 there ....Do you like the UNDER at this number ????
Might be too much variance in the outcome
Pass for now ....
Can't see campus books dropping the total
I don't know anything about Penn St but knowing what I know about UB I'd bet the under until I see 2 games go over the total. I think they run the ball good enough to chew clock ,but not good enough to score a lot or fast. Just need the defense to slow down Penn St here and there...
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
I was spot on with the line guess of 27
South Campus has a early posted total of 59.5 !!!!
I'm limited to $500 there ....Do you like the UNDER at this number ????
Might be too much variance in the outcome
Pass for now ....
Can't see campus books dropping the total
I don't know anything about Penn St but knowing what I know about UB I'd bet the under until I see 2 games go over the total. I think they run the ball good enough to chew clock ,but not good enough to score a lot or fast. Just need the defense to slow down Penn St here and there...
As a Michigan fan, +24 would be nice, but the 23 is tempting in its own I feel. Sloppy tackling on Saturday, combined with Army’s offensive style, could leave to some lengthy drives. Wether these drives result in TD’s, it’ll limit UM possessions to cover such a high number. That’s the better in me, the fan in me is just hoping the UM defense was just rusting, a bit too jacked, or something else.
[/Quote]
0
Michigan 18.5 ARMY
Were rhe Cadets sandbagging ????
+23 off by 4.5 ...Hoping to get 24+
As a Michigan fan, +24 would be nice, but the 23 is tempting in its own I feel. Sloppy tackling on Saturday, combined with Army’s offensive style, could leave to some lengthy drives. Wether these drives result in TD’s, it’ll limit UM possessions to cover such a high number. That’s the better in me, the fan in me is just hoping the UM defense was just rusting, a bit too jacked, or something else.
Army and the 23 looks tempting. Michigan’s tackling Saturday wasn’t the greatest, combine that with army’s offensive style of play, I see some long drives that will limit UM possessions. Wether those drives result in TD’s or not is another thing, but at the very least, runs the clock and makes it difficult to cover that number. As a Michigan fan I hope I’m wrong.
1
Army and the 23 looks tempting. Michigan’s tackling Saturday wasn’t the greatest, combine that with army’s offensive style of play, I see some long drives that will limit UM possessions. Wether those drives result in TD’s or not is another thing, but at the very least, runs the clock and makes it difficult to cover that number. As a Michigan fan I hope I’m wrong.
I don't know anything about Penn St but knowing what I know about UB I'd bet the under until I see 2 games go over the total. I think they run the ball good enough to chew clock ,but not good enough to score a lot or fast. Just need the defense to slow down Penn St here and there...
57isnt bad , but I wanted 60+ ...
Passing for now ....
a
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I don't know anything about Penn St but knowing what I know about UB I'd bet the under until I see 2 games go over the total. I think they run the ball good enough to chew clock ,but not good enough to score a lot or fast. Just need the defense to slow down Penn St here and there...
Army and the 23 looks tempting. Michigan’s tackling Saturday wasn’t the greatest, combine that with army’s offensive style of play, I see some long drives that will limit UM possessions. Wether those drives result in TD’s or not is another thing, but at the very least, runs the clock and makes it difficult to cover that number. As a Michigan fan I hope I’m wrong.
Could see it being tighter than the spread , But your boys should win by 10- !!! No result would shock me though ....When that Army offense is clicking it burns up the clock as you mentioned limiting possessions ....
Was hoping for 24+ , but the point spread ratings show value with the CADETS ( +17.3 )
ILL jump on now for a 0.25 units
Army +23
$55/50
If it reaches 24 I'll probably put a little more down
Best of LUCK BROTHER
SWEEP YOUR BOARD
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Moonstormsnow:
Army and the 23 looks tempting. Michigan’s tackling Saturday wasn’t the greatest, combine that with army’s offensive style of play, I see some long drives that will limit UM possessions. Wether those drives result in TD’s or not is another thing, but at the very least, runs the clock and makes it difficult to cover that number. As a Michigan fan I hope I’m wrong.
Could see it being tighter than the spread , But your boys should win by 10- !!! No result would shock me though ....When that Army offense is clicking it burns up the clock as you mentioned limiting possessions ....
Was hoping for 24+ , but the point spread ratings show value with the CADETS ( +17.3 )
ILL jump on now for a 0.25 units
Army +23
$55/50
If it reaches 24 I'll probably put a little more down
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.