ok first bomb dropped, satellite confirms target hit
Charleston Southern, Colorado St....after getting a W vs crappy Ark at hm so bad team w/ no interest, Tenn. That is +10 turnovers, they have 10 fumble recoveries on the year. It was raining, riding the high, and looking ahead to this week. Miss St is certainly over rated some, he is not a great passer but his WRs dropped some balls. And best part is how are you gonna tell 18-20 year old kids who are 3-1 and off back to back blowout wins that they aren't good? They are probably looking ahead to upsetting LSU next week.
FLA has no offense, they have not been able to run the ball for at least 7 years and Franks is horrible. And the D stats are padded by those chumps they played, eye test says the defense has slipped....maybe 40 to 50th? Some bourbon math I did the other day had MSU winning by 16-24 pts.
Charleston Southern, Colorado St....after getting a W vs crappy Ark at hm so bad team w/ no interest, Tenn. That is +10 turnovers, they have 10 fumble recoveries on the year. It was raining, riding the high, and looking ahead to this week. Miss St is certainly over rated some, he is not a great passer but his WRs dropped some balls. And best part is how are you gonna tell 18-20 year old kids who are 3-1 and off back to back blowout wins that they aren't good? They are probably looking ahead to upsetting LSU next week.
FLA has no offense, they have not been able to run the ball for at least 7 years and Franks is horrible. And the D stats are padded by those chumps they played, eye test says the defense has slipped....maybe 40 to 50th? Some bourbon math I did the other day had MSU winning by 16-24 pts.
Charleston Southern, Colorado St....after getting a W vs crappy Ark at hm so bad team w/ no interest, Tenn. That is +10 turnovers, they have 10 fumble recoveries on the year. It was raining, riding the high, and looking ahead to this week. Miss St is certainly over rated some, he is not a great passer but his WRs dropped some balls. And best part is how are you gonna tell 18-20 year old kids who are 3-1 and off back to back blowout wins that they aren't good? They are probably looking ahead to upsetting LSU next week.
FLA has no offense, they have not been able to run the ball for at least 7 years and Franks is horrible. And the D stats are padded by those chumps they played, eye test says the defense has slipped....maybe 40 to 50th? Some bourbon math I did the other day had MSU winning by 16-24 pts.
Charleston Southern, Colorado St....after getting a W vs crappy Ark at hm so bad team w/ no interest, Tenn. That is +10 turnovers, they have 10 fumble recoveries on the year. It was raining, riding the high, and looking ahead to this week. Miss St is certainly over rated some, he is not a great passer but his WRs dropped some balls. And best part is how are you gonna tell 18-20 year old kids who are 3-1 and off back to back blowout wins that they aren't good? They are probably looking ahead to upsetting LSU next week.
FLA has no offense, they have not been able to run the ball for at least 7 years and Franks is horrible. And the D stats are padded by those chumps they played, eye test says the defense has slipped....maybe 40 to 50th? Some bourbon math I did the other day had MSU winning by 16-24 pts.
FLA churns out a lot of alumni and with the vape pens no one remembers past 1.2 weeks. Bookies gonna eventually catch up with Buffalo but they are probably wondering WTF? They hung Buffalo up as a road favorite....road favorite vs a Power 5 team...yes in name only Power 5 but not everyone betting has an IQ of 90+ like myself...haha. And what did they do, smacked them by 29 pts. Last yr not really the same scenario, Army has to be a little sore and tired, travel from Okie to NY and they ran like 109 plays last week. Might win by 7 though?
FLA churns out a lot of alumni and with the vape pens no one remembers past 1.2 weeks. Bookies gonna eventually catch up with Buffalo but they are probably wondering WTF? They hung Buffalo up as a road favorite....road favorite vs a Power 5 team...yes in name only Power 5 but not everyone betting has an IQ of 90+ like myself...haha. And what did they do, smacked them by 29 pts. Last yr not really the same scenario, Army has to be a little sore and tired, travel from Okie to NY and they ran like 109 plays last week. Might win by 7 though?
with the B1G ranked teams going 5-0 ats and 2-1 in non-con games after a dismal previous week for the whole conference,
which dog do you think has the best opportunity to back this week against B1G teams? a perfect score ats is very unlikely
again. with wisc idle that leaves 4 teams to chose from and OSU and PSU collide, leaving the two teams
from Michigan to chose from to not back. Personally, i'll take the big number against MSU and go with C. mich.
Your thoughts?
with the B1G ranked teams going 5-0 ats and 2-1 in non-con games after a dismal previous week for the whole conference,
which dog do you think has the best opportunity to back this week against B1G teams? a perfect score ats is very unlikely
again. with wisc idle that leaves 4 teams to chose from and OSU and PSU collide, leaving the two teams
from Michigan to chose from to not back. Personally, i'll take the big number against MSU and go with C. mich.
Your thoughts?
Vape pen talking...
North Texas would beat 7 teams in the Big 10, that's half the conference.
Stanford w/ Bryce Love as a senior can't run the ball. They have played a bit tougher schedule than most, but still telling.
Vape pen talking...
North Texas would beat 7 teams in the Big 10, that's half the conference.
Stanford w/ Bryce Love as a senior can't run the ball. They have played a bit tougher schedule than most, but still telling.
thanks for backing up my choice. like following your insights
thanks for backing up my choice. like following your insights
just picked up on you lately. do you post on any other forums? ncaaf, ncaab, nba, nhl? like to follow your opinions
just picked up on you lately. do you post on any other forums? ncaaf, ncaab, nba, nhl? like to follow your opinions
Bama Under 67. As someone else said, wait until its 28-0 in the 1st and load up more on Bama under 80 live (or if there's any hiccup in the beginning, take over high 50s for a nice middle). The way I see it, Tua only plays maybe 1 or 2 series in the 2nd half and Mac Jones probably plays/runs out most of the 4th. Saban doesn't like to drub these teams like Urban does, the 2nd half in these games is always FAST. An over bet would be banking on ULL to score more than 10, and I just don't see that happening.
Bama Under 67. As someone else said, wait until its 28-0 in the 1st and load up more on Bama under 80 live (or if there's any hiccup in the beginning, take over high 50s for a nice middle). The way I see it, Tua only plays maybe 1 or 2 series in the 2nd half and Mac Jones probably plays/runs out most of the 4th. Saban doesn't like to drub these teams like Urban does, the 2nd half in these games is always FAST. An over bet would be banking on ULL to score more than 10, and I just don't see that happening.
Wahoos. First time I've actually read one of your threads... good stuff.
How about this ucla/Colorado game.... nothing but a sad soap opera in west wood right now...Getting out of Pasadena to play this week should help them a bit mentally but not in Colorado...... this is already a poor tackling team that comitts a bunch of stupid penalties... that will only get worse in Colorado as they'll be gasping for air... ucla is a very weak minded team. What's your opinion?
Wahoos. First time I've actually read one of your threads... good stuff.
How about this ucla/Colorado game.... nothing but a sad soap opera in west wood right now...Getting out of Pasadena to play this week should help them a bit mentally but not in Colorado...... this is already a poor tackling team that comitts a bunch of stupid penalties... that will only get worse in Colorado as they'll be gasping for air... ucla is a very weak minded team. What's your opinion?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.