All Forums | College Football

Week 7 Money - Hoo Train Steaming

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 46627
Posts: 417
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #201
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

What our straight play list? 
go get odds on Triple H

All lines changed on my straight list by now because I’m a tac 

Out of my element but still going to FedEx the forum some winners

I’ll work on “new list” with these current bad lines 


43% in full effect 
.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #202
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

UDMLP “fast break football combo”

UCLA
TULSA
HEELS
HUSKERS


I’m cringing Train, you’re taking me out of my element here but I’m literally going to bet these with you (obv very small)

See what these odds are 

You having fun or what!?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #203
Hoos/Hoosiers/Hogs pay 26-1


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #204
Tulsa/UCLA/Neb/UNC pays 81-1
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 5689
Posted: #205
You should toss Oregon on that UDML .... quack attack is back jack... 


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #206
Neb/UCLA/Virg/UNC/Colorado/Arkansas 833-1


Round robins of 4 & 5 teamers of course
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #207
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:


You having fun or what!?
 I cant choose it, you do it, I just can’t 

I will bet it though 


Btw- Bentley back for Scaro

No prob, Ags -2     Baaaaaaaang 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #208
See if you like Ags & NOT because I like them

Only if you also like them we can add as straight 

Team agreement, has to be that way for our thread this week 

Only IF you like them 
.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #209
I concur on A&M -2


Only team to put a fight vs Bama. Coach and QB advantage....


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #210


I’ve already bet them on my own so the forum knows I like them, keep that in mind 

they don’t have to be on our list 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #211
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

I concur on A&M -2


Only team to put a fight vs Bama. Coach and QB advantage....


way better defense as well 

done done & done 

Bang 
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #212
Official Hoo Train Bets updated

1. Utah St - 24 (safety net hook)
2. Utah St - 17.5 / App St - 2.5 (2 team teaser)
3. Texas A&M - 2





.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #213
The triple H can be our official udmlp.....but im playing all 4 i have posted in here 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #214
Liking San Jose St +15 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Liking San Jose St +15 
that game didn’t catch my eye but it’s being moved up to very early start time for Spartans meaning no fans 

You like it because travel or trading scores or what?  I’m listening 


.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #216
Train

there’s about 7 threads posted asking about Nebraska/Nw line 

You were already convinced Nebraska would win

I’m not scared 
.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #217
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

that game didn’t catch my eye but it’s being moved up to very early start time for Spartans meaning no fans 

You like it because travel or trading scores or what?  I’m listening 


San Jose St can throw the ball (25th in nation), and can play decent run defense (58th)....theyve already played Wazzu, Oregon and Hawaii so theyve seen decent cometition and have been at home since Sept 15th.....Army has looked stellar pounding Buffalo and nearly beating OU.....but the by week usually slows momentum, and thisnis their 3rd road game in a month....This will be the best defense theyve seen since week 1 when Duke held them to 14 points.

I think SJST can get some stops, and am pretty sure they will be able to move the ball.....SJST ML in a parlay is callin my name.....
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #218
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

San Jose St can throw the ball (25th in nation), and can play decent run defense (58th)....theyve already played Wazzu, Oregon and Hawaii so theyve seen decent cometition and have been at home since Sept 15th.....Army has looked stellar pounding Buffalo and nearly beating OU.....but the by week usually slows momentum, and thisnis their 3rd road game in a month....This will be the best defense theyve seen since week 1 when Duke held them to 14 points.

I think SJST can get some stops, and am pretty sure they will be able to move the ball.....SJST ML in a parlay is callin my name.....

Hmm, ok, you know I don’t tail others but this is a combo thread so I like your attitude here 

Army is nasty this year , I watched them vs Buffalo but this is a complete role reversal as we are getting points 

Was never on my radar except that odd start time, Spartans radio announcer & cheer squad will be only spectators there 

Let me dig further 
.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2017
Posts: 22
Posted: #219

Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

that game didn’t catch my eye but it’s being moved up to very early start time for Spartans meaning no fans You like it because travel or trading scores or what?  I’m listening 
San Jose St can throw the ball (25th in nation), and can play decent run defense (58th)....theyve already played Wazzu, Oregon and Hawaii so theyve seen decent cometition and have been at home since Sept 15th.....Army has looked stellar pounding Buffalo and nearly beating OU.....but the by week usually slows momentum, and thisnis their 3rd road game in a month....This will be the best defense theyve seen since week 1 when Duke held them to 14 points.I think SJST can get some stops, and am pretty sure they will be able to move the ball.....SJST ML in a parlay is callin my name.....

 

You both are awesome on this thread but I'd caution any money on SJST... Army is no joke this year.

They play some decent pass defense (Oklahoma and Liberty)

If you look at that Buffalo game, they spotted Buffalo and easy score. I think a fifty yarder, then got intercepted, the Army D stiffened up, then Army routed them. They play with poise and they have won me some cash. (Oklahoma and Buffalo)

San Jose is no Duke. BOL!

 

 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #220
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:


Hmm, ok, you know I don’t tail others but this is a combo thread so I like your attitude here 

Army is nasty this year , I watched them vs Buffalo but this is a complete role reversal as we are getting points 

Was never on my radar except that odd start time, Spartans radio announcer & cheer squad will be only spectators there 

Let me dig further 
I also think Bama needs to be in our thoughts. Mizzou on b2b roadies....they will crumble under the spotlight in Tuscaloosa. Lock is decent, but when the run game aint workin and the Bama D line starts hounding him bad things will happen. The Mizzou defense is swiss cheese. Tua and crew will lay waste.....
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #221
Quote Originally Posted by sexyllama:

San Jose St can throw the ball (25th in nation), and can play decent run defense (58th)....theyve already played Wazzu, Oregon and Hawaii so theyve seen decent cometition and have been at home since Sept 15th.....Army has looked stellar pounding Buffalo and nearly beating OU.....but the by week usually slows momentum, and thisnis their 3rd road game in a month....This will be the best defense theyve seen since week 1 when Duke held them to 14 points.I think SJST can get some stops, and am pretty sure they will be able to move the ball.....SJST ML in a parlay is callin my name.....

 

You both are awesome on this thread but I'd caution any money on SJST... Army is no joke this year.

They play some decent pass defense (Oklahoma and Liberty)

If you look at that Buffalo game, they spotted Buffalo and easy score. I think a fifty yarder, then got intercepted, the Army D stiffened up, then Army routed them. They play with poise and they have won me some cash. (Oklahoma and Buffalo)

San Jose is no Duke. BOL!

 

 

 

Great post brother! Good points for sure. Always good to hear others thoughts. I concur Army has been solid. This is a different role for them....they are now expected to win and win pretty big......we shall see.

GL brother
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #222
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

Train

there’s about 7 threads posted asking about Nebraska/Nw line 

You were already convinced Nebraska would win

I’m not scared 
When Joe Public thinks a play looks to easy thats red flag for that team....

Kinda interested in Wisconsin +7.5 as well
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #223
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

I also think Bama needs to be in our thoughts. Mizzou on b2b roadies....they will crumble under the spotlight in Tuscaloosa. Lock is decent, but when the run game aint workin and the Bama D line starts hounding him bad things will happen. The Mizzou defense is swiss cheese. Tua and crew will lay waste.....

Yeah, Tua a bit dingy in the knee so I’m thinking Bama plays more run game clock control to help defense & not mess with Lock

I don’t love this one myself after chatting with someone , Tua prob doesn’t play much here is the feeling I was getting 

I think game under is on my radar now 

food for thought 
.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54701
Posted: #224
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:


Yeah, Tua a bit dingy in the knee so I’m thinking Bama plays more run game clock control to help defense & not mess with Lock

I don’t love this one myself after chatting with someone , Tua prob doesn’t play much here is the feeling I was getting 

I think game under is on my radar now 

food for thought 
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25585
Posted: #225
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:


Nick loves his new offense but in his heart of hearts he’s a defense first guy & last week worries him me thinks 

He may go back to his roots vs that high octane mizz squad & run at them with more clock control 

Could be wrong but that’s my feeling, total is high, if they contain mizz a little it should go under as long as Tua isn’t throwing 75 yard bombs all game 


.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.