It's gotten to the point where it's no longer challenging or even funny to respond to pieces of shi*.
"There is no evidence."
What would you like as evidence? Brain scans? Doctor's notes? After the fight would you like Ronda to say "I lost because I was a broken woman psychologically.'
Even if you had all this, you would say it's lip service, fraudulent documentation and/or testing.
NOTHING would convince you.
And now you saying (post-fight which is shameful because you don't put your neck on the line) it's a coaching issue.
How the hell do you know if her coaching and strategy wasn't the best it has ever been but the first right that rocked her threw off her entire gameplan? You know what it is to take a punch with that much force?
NOTHING is certifiable. That is why we have ANGLES. And the angles, be them substantive or not, bear themselves out when you WIN or LOSE.
And not just one win, but a consistent winner of which I am for YEARS, you dumba** because I explain my angles and people can CHOOSE to buy into them.
So go rummage through Rousey's hotel room for doctor's notes because you won't find any.
And get back to me when you have a winning angle (or pick or write-up) before the fight or game of ANY KIND.
To the other guys above as usual. Thanks my 'sheeple'. Yes you are a 'sheep' for following a +135 ML winner and write-up.
It's gotten to the point where it's no longer challenging or even funny to respond to pieces of shi*.
"There is no evidence."
What would you like as evidence? Brain scans? Doctor's notes? After the fight would you like Ronda to say "I lost because I was a broken woman psychologically.'
Even if you had all this, you would say it's lip service, fraudulent documentation and/or testing.
NOTHING would convince you.
And now you saying (post-fight which is shameful because you don't put your neck on the line) it's a coaching issue.
How the hell do you know if her coaching and strategy wasn't the best it has ever been but the first right that rocked her threw off her entire gameplan? You know what it is to take a punch with that much force?
NOTHING is certifiable. That is why we have ANGLES. And the angles, be them substantive or not, bear themselves out when you WIN or LOSE.
And not just one win, but a consistent winner of which I am for YEARS, you dumba** because I explain my angles and people can CHOOSE to buy into them.
So go rummage through Rousey's hotel room for doctor's notes because you won't find any.
And get back to me when you have a winning angle (or pick or write-up) before the fight or game of ANY KIND.
To the other guys above as usual. Thanks my 'sheeple'. Yes you are a 'sheep' for following a +135 ML winner and write-up.
Couldn't throw a meaningful punch.
Couldn't block a punch.
The ref had to end it mercifully in 48 seconds, not due to submission but due to the fact that Rousey looked like a woman off the street.
And this was, as her 3 million dollar paycheck certifies (because you wouldn't be paying someone of her caliber THAT much money for one fight if she wasn't great) she was the greatest female fighter ever in the Octagon.
And the greatest female fighter, who had her fight end on a mercy stop even before it got going, lost because of a 'coaching and strategy' issue and there is NO evidence her performance had anything to do with her psyche. Ok.
I wonder how Papa would coach her? Curl up in a ball in the corner for 5 minutes through round 1?
Folks, just hear what the trolls are saying and then make your own assessments. It's all here. Papa? Not a troll. Good argumentation. Didn't work out. Jdr Hugh and the rest of his lackeys? Pure unadulterated trolls who stalk me for.....god knows what???
Couldn't throw a meaningful punch.
Couldn't block a punch.
The ref had to end it mercifully in 48 seconds, not due to submission but due to the fact that Rousey looked like a woman off the street.
And this was, as her 3 million dollar paycheck certifies (because you wouldn't be paying someone of her caliber THAT much money for one fight if she wasn't great) she was the greatest female fighter ever in the Octagon.
And the greatest female fighter, who had her fight end on a mercy stop even before it got going, lost because of a 'coaching and strategy' issue and there is NO evidence her performance had anything to do with her psyche. Ok.
I wonder how Papa would coach her? Curl up in a ball in the corner for 5 minutes through round 1?
Folks, just hear what the trolls are saying and then make your own assessments. It's all here. Papa? Not a troll. Good argumentation. Didn't work out. Jdr Hugh and the rest of his lackeys? Pure unadulterated trolls who stalk me for.....god knows what???
Papa, if that result isn't psychological, I don't know what is. There is no believing or not. I guess life is all belief isn't it? Billions believe in Allah. Billion believe in Christ. Some believe in science. Who is right? Who is wrong? We can take the 'believe' stance.
But that was a beaten fighter right from the first bell. That was an amateur out there. She lost it. Her already ragged psyche is exactly WHY her head wasn't moving. She moved it more than sufficiently in her rise to the top when she had all the fame and glory.
It was a mercy stoppage. At one point she is against the octagon covering up (and this is a mere 30 seconds into the fight).
You see that in streetfights where the bully knows he can kill the nerd. You just want out. Just make it stop. I've sure many here have been in such situations in their life. It happens. Nothing to be ashamed of.
Let's talk about moving and jabbing and take-downs and technical aspects of the fight in a real fight that goes beyond 50 seconds. This wasn't even a challenge. Of course we can say "If Ronda did this or that she wins" and Nunes of course will throw a bone at some point. You can say that in every fight and every game. The Browns say this every game and it has left them at 1-14. "If we ran the ball well we would have won." They have no RB's. Therefore, let's not talk about running the ball effectively. Ronda had nothing right from the first punch. Her attempts at takedowns happen at my local MMA gyms.
This was a beaten woman from the bell. And that was the angle and that is what I bet on. And if I didn't bet on that, and bet on Ronda's skillset overall, then I have to side with Ronda, which I wouldn't do after betting on innumerable games be it NFL NBA NCAA on psychological situational angles. And they don't ALL come through. But many do. And that is all that matters. Win the many and make up for the rest.
Papa, if that result isn't psychological, I don't know what is. There is no believing or not. I guess life is all belief isn't it? Billions believe in Allah. Billion believe in Christ. Some believe in science. Who is right? Who is wrong? We can take the 'believe' stance.
But that was a beaten fighter right from the first bell. That was an amateur out there. She lost it. Her already ragged psyche is exactly WHY her head wasn't moving. She moved it more than sufficiently in her rise to the top when she had all the fame and glory.
It was a mercy stoppage. At one point she is against the octagon covering up (and this is a mere 30 seconds into the fight).
You see that in streetfights where the bully knows he can kill the nerd. You just want out. Just make it stop. I've sure many here have been in such situations in their life. It happens. Nothing to be ashamed of.
Let's talk about moving and jabbing and take-downs and technical aspects of the fight in a real fight that goes beyond 50 seconds. This wasn't even a challenge. Of course we can say "If Ronda did this or that she wins" and Nunes of course will throw a bone at some point. You can say that in every fight and every game. The Browns say this every game and it has left them at 1-14. "If we ran the ball well we would have won." They have no RB's. Therefore, let's not talk about running the ball effectively. Ronda had nothing right from the first punch. Her attempts at takedowns happen at my local MMA gyms.
This was a beaten woman from the bell. And that was the angle and that is what I bet on. And if I didn't bet on that, and bet on Ronda's skillset overall, then I have to side with Ronda, which I wouldn't do after betting on innumerable games be it NFL NBA NCAA on psychological situational angles. And they don't ALL come through. But many do. And that is all that matters. Win the many and make up for the rest.
Papa, if that result isn't psychological, I don't know what is. There is no believing or not. I guess life is all belief isn't it? Billions believe in Allah. Billion believe in Christ. Some believe in science. Who is right? Who is wrong? We can take the 'believe' stance.
But that was a beaten fighter right from the first bell. That was an amateur out there. She lost it. Her already ragged psyche is exactly WHY her head wasn't moving. She moved it more than sufficiently in her rise to the top when she had all the fame and glory.
It was a mercy stoppage. At one point she is against the octagon covering up (and this is a mere 30 seconds into the fight).
You see that in streetfights where the bully knows he can kill the nerd. You just want out. Just make it stop. I've sure many here have been in such situations in their life. It happens. Nothing to be ashamed of.
Let's talk about moving and jabbing and take-downs and technical aspects of the fight in a real fight that goes beyond 50 seconds. This wasn't even a challenge. Of course we can say "If Ronda did this or that she wins" and Nunes of course will throw a bone at some point. You can say that in every fight and every game. The Browns say this every game and it has left them at 1-14. "If we ran the ball well we would have won." They have no RB's. Therefore, let's not talk about running the ball effectively. Ronda had nothing right from the first punch. Her attempts at takedowns happen at my local MMA gyms.
This was a beaten woman from the bell. And that was the angle and that is what I bet on. And if I didn't bet on that, and bet on Ronda's skillset overall, then I have to side with Ronda, which I wouldn't do after betting on innumerable games be it NFL NBA NCAA on psychological situational angles. And they don't ALL come through. But many do. And that is all that matters. Win the many and make up for the rest.
Papa, if that result isn't psychological, I don't know what is. There is no believing or not. I guess life is all belief isn't it? Billions believe in Allah. Billion believe in Christ. Some believe in science. Who is right? Who is wrong? We can take the 'believe' stance.
But that was a beaten fighter right from the first bell. That was an amateur out there. She lost it. Her already ragged psyche is exactly WHY her head wasn't moving. She moved it more than sufficiently in her rise to the top when she had all the fame and glory.
It was a mercy stoppage. At one point she is against the octagon covering up (and this is a mere 30 seconds into the fight).
You see that in streetfights where the bully knows he can kill the nerd. You just want out. Just make it stop. I've sure many here have been in such situations in their life. It happens. Nothing to be ashamed of.
Let's talk about moving and jabbing and take-downs and technical aspects of the fight in a real fight that goes beyond 50 seconds. This wasn't even a challenge. Of course we can say "If Ronda did this or that she wins" and Nunes of course will throw a bone at some point. You can say that in every fight and every game. The Browns say this every game and it has left them at 1-14. "If we ran the ball well we would have won." They have no RB's. Therefore, let's not talk about running the ball effectively. Ronda had nothing right from the first punch. Her attempts at takedowns happen at my local MMA gyms.
This was a beaten woman from the bell. And that was the angle and that is what I bet on. And if I didn't bet on that, and bet on Ronda's skillset overall, then I have to side with Ronda, which I wouldn't do after betting on innumerable games be it NFL NBA NCAA on psychological situational angles. And they don't ALL come through. But many do. And that is all that matters. Win the many and make up for the rest.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.