the new analytics say to go for 2... coaches have now adopted this method from the old ball coach steve spurrier.. vanzack had a thread about this a while back... tough break man..
the new analytics say to go for 2... coaches have now adopted this method from the old ball coach steve spurrier.. vanzack had a thread about this a while back... tough break man..
I had ML 2nd HALF so aside the fact of knowing I basically couldn't lose, I don't agree with your statement or anybody's write up on college coaches developing or adapting a new method at this time in the game. This made ABSOLUTELY no sense in regards to many things. #1 being you're on the road. You're not at home. You're down by 14 not 15. #2 you know you need to score again to even have a shot so taking the chance on that 2 PT was FOOLISH. Although it worked out, there is no (0%) logic to going for 2 at that time in the game on the road in that position. I've been doing this for 20+ years and no newbie to bad beats, but this is very SUSPICIOUS
I had ML 2nd HALF so aside the fact of knowing I basically couldn't lose, I don't agree with your statement or anybody's write up on college coaches developing or adapting a new method at this time in the game. This made ABSOLUTELY no sense in regards to many things. #1 being you're on the road. You're not at home. You're down by 14 not 15. #2 you know you need to score again to even have a shot so taking the chance on that 2 PT was FOOLISH. Although it worked out, there is no (0%) logic to going for 2 at that time in the game on the road in that position. I've been doing this for 20+ years and no newbie to bad beats, but this is very SUSPICIOUS
I agree with this. Coach clearly helped any SMU backers including big donors to cover. The previous go for two attempts made sense...one was when they were down by 16. Down by 14 knowing you’ll have to onside kick and still go for two makes absolutely no sense....
I agree with this. Coach clearly helped any SMU backers including big donors to cover. The previous go for two attempts made sense...one was when they were down by 16. Down by 14 knowing you’ll have to onside kick and still go for two makes absolutely no sense....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.