GL Dtothe, I like it.
Buff +4 and the Over 55.5 (big Play)
Buff team score Ov 26 as well . BOL guys
GL Phan. If I was going to take the total I would go over. When the weather gets this cold sometimes the little things don't click. Slight tendancy to fumble or drop a pass worries me.
Yeah, how convenient...
And I dont care if you bet them or not...you posted two losers for one game. Maybe if Fresno wins you can use the same excuse.
What a complete liar and moron! "Oh, uh, wait, it lost so, let's see, I ,uh cancelled by bet. Yeah, that's it"
And he says "I might bet a hefty sum" Well if it is a guarentee if you bet less than $50,000 you are a fool.
The ole Lock word. Kmaster you are a tool!
I Totally agree, i think Bg's D is averaging 200 yds on the ground, which is pathetic, even for a college team. Buff is in a groove right now. Here's an interesting thought, this trick was taught to me by a capper when i worked in Vegas, its not full proof, but nothing is right??, here it is: for example: bg vs. buff
first add up points scored for each team over the last 8 to 10 games, come up with an avg. in this case bg is avg. 26pts a game, buff is avg. 30 a game, over the last 10. that total is 56 is the line is under, go under is its over go over. Pending proper consideration for weather condidtions, injuries, and home field advantage. Its that simple. And isnt it ironic that the difference in pts scored is 4, in favor of buff... gl to all
Can this formula be use for other sports as well?
Yeah, how convenient...
And I dont care if you bet them or not...you posted two losers for one game. Maybe if Fresno wins you can use the same excuse
Check out this guys playbook.....he does the same thing then criticizes others for doing the same lol!
agent0 says:
hey fpronk - i like your write up's and analysis of games - just a question about last night. I'm trying to follow what your actual "plays" are, and am doing so here in the playbook. Unless I was dreaming, I could have swore you had Lakers/under posted here, but now I dont see it
Fpronk says:
I was going to make a play for the Lakers UNDER but changed my mind before tip off. I don't like wagering NBA games because there are too many variables towards the end of the game that can take the spread or total one way or the other.
Yeah, how convenient...
And I dont care if you bet them or not...you posted two losers for one game. Maybe if Fresno wins you can use the same excuse
Check out this guys playbook.....he does the same thing then criticizes others for doing the same lol!
agent0 says:
hey fpronk - i like your write up's and analysis of games - just a question about last night. I'm trying to follow what your actual "plays" are, and am doing so here in the playbook. Unless I was dreaming, I could have swore you had Lakers/under posted here, but now I dont see it
Fpronk says:
I was going to make a play for the Lakers UNDER but changed my mind before tip off. I don't like wagering NBA games because there are too many variables towards the end of the game that can take the spread or total one way or the other.
Yeah, I never made the post anywhere on my page or anywhere else AHOLE. I was talking about the game in a thread and said I was leaning on the game..YOU ARE A TARD...MOVE ON TOUT!
The difference is you made a blatant play in a thread and lost...a lean is not a pick douche bag...
Fpronk says:
READ THE WHOLE SENTECE...I was going to make a play for the Lakers UNDER but changed my mind before tip off. I don't like wagering NBA games because there are too many variables towards the end of the game that can take the spread or total one way or the other.
Fpronk says:
READ THE WHOLE SENTECE...I was going to make a play for the Lakers UNDER but changed my mind before tip off. I don't like wagering NBA games because there are too many variables towards the end of the game that can take the spread or total one way or the other.
and let it go.
Established in 1995,
Hey Kid, as a long time gambler I don't discuss my wagers with my closest friends what makes you think I will tell you. 
Hot Forum Topics
