Posted:
#26
You do realize they beat Georgia, not exactly "weak".
The loss to South Cacalac should actually scare Ohio St backers, as Clemson generally shut down the run game of Shaw and Davis. Granted OSU's run combo is a little more dangerous. The loss came via turnovers, which OSU's defense doesn't have the talent to replicate. Same story for the meltdown at FSU, picks and fumble returns for TDs.
Also have to think that Brent Venables will be able to devise a good gameplan for Urban's offense. He did a solid job slowing down a far far far better Urban team in the national title game for the 2008 season while at Okla.
The public is all over OSU and the line just hovers at 2.5 / 3, like Clemson to cover and win.
Where have you gone Siterbun? America turns its lonely eyes to you.
Quote Originally Posted by lordzud:
Ohio St in a shootout. Look at Clemson's schedule, who did they beat? They won a bunch of games against weak opponents and the two tough opponents they lost to. I was impressed by Sparty beating Stanford, if Ohio St lost to Sparty at Michigan that doesn't look as bad now that Michigan St has proved itself to be a top tier team.
Ohio St in a shootout. Look at Clemson's schedule, who did they beat? They won a bunch of games against weak opponents and the two tough opponents they lost to. I was impressed by Sparty beating Stanford, if Ohio St lost to Sparty at Michigan that doesn't look as bad now that Michigan St has proved itself to be a top tier team.
0
OOPS I'm dating myself. Good historic look. 
Hot Forum Topics
